Advertisement

The Middle East, Afghanistan, Bosnia and the Gulf

  • Kim Coleman

Abstract

While the United States was still involved in the Vietnam War, another war in the Middle East brought the subject of chemical warfare back to the forefront. From 1963 reports began to filter out of the use of poison gas in the Yemeni Civil War. It was alleged that the gas was being used by the Egyptians on behalf of their allies, the Yemeni Republicans. The charges came from the Yemeni Royalists, their supporters, the Saudi Arabians, from journalists and finally, most authoritatively, from the International Red Cross.

Keywords

Nerve Agent Sulphur Mustard Chemical Weapon Chemical Warfare Agent United Nations Security Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    M. Meselson, ‘The Yemen’, in Steven Rose (ed.), Chemical and Biological Warfare, London: Harrap (1968), p. 99.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    D.H. Schmidt, Yemen: The Unknown War, London (1968).Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    S.M. Hersh, Chemical and Biological Warfare: America’s Hidden Arsenal, New York: Bobbs-Merrill (1968), pp. 286–287.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    US Army Chemical Corps, Summary of Major Events and Problems, FY (1961), No. 62, 99, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    Karel Knip, Biologie in Ness Ziona, NRC Hanelsband (27 February 1999).Google Scholar
  6. 17.
    See, for example, SIPRI, The Problems of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Stockholm (1971), Vol. 1, pp. 75–78; Vol. 11, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
  7. 23.
    A.M. Haig Jr, Chemical Warfare in South East Asia and Afghanistan, Report to Congress, Washington DC: Department of State (1982), Special Report No. 98.Google Scholar
  8. 31.
    Quoted in P. Dunn, Chemical Aspects of The Gulf War: Investigations by the United Nations, Ascot Vale, Australia (1987).Google Scholar
  9. 32.
    R.M. Coik-Deegan et al., Winds of Death: Iraqs Use of Poison Gas Against Its Kurdish Population, Report of a Medical mission to Turkish Kurdistan by Physicians for Human Rights, Boston: Massachusetts (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    JNA, Speciajalne Rucne Bombe M-79, Belgrade (1988). Translated by Human Rights Watch (1999).Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    David Rohde, Endgame: The Betrayal and Fall of Srebrenica, Europe’s Worst Massacre Since World War IIB, New York (1997), pp. 266–273.Google Scholar
  12. 46.
    Jonathan B. Tucker, Non-Proliferation Review (Spring-Summer 1997), p. 114.Google Scholar
  13. 74.
    Hans Blix, Disarming Iraq, Pantheon Books (2004), Chapter 1, ‘Moments of Truth’.Google Scholar
  14. 75.
    CIA, Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs (October 2002). Full text available at www.cia.gov.Google Scholar
  15. 76.
    Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Introduction to Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Assessment of the British Government (September 2002), p. 3. Full text available at www.pm.gov.uk.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Coleman 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Coleman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations