The Inter-War Years, 1919–1939

  • Kim Coleman


It was natural that the war should be followed by a wave of anti-war feeling. The war had done what the writing of the economists had failed to do: it had demonstrated that modern warfare brought loss on a colossal scale to the victors as well as the vanquished. The establishment of the League of Nations, and its early activities, showed a general determination to find an alternative to war for the settlement of international disputes. Nevertheless, the calls for worldwide disarmament continued and eventually legislation was passed in an effort to limit chemical weapons.


Nerve Agent Sulphur Mustard Chemical Weapon Chemical Warfare Agent Hydrogen Cyanide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A.A. Fries., ‘Sixteen Reasons Why the Chemical Warfare Service must be a Separate Department of the Army’, Chemical Warfare (1920), Vol. 2(1), p. 4.Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    L.P. Brophy and G.J.B. Fisher, The Chemical Warfare Service: From Laboratory to Field, Washington DC: Office of the Chief of Military History (1959), pp. 2–27, 49–76.Google Scholar
  3. 23.
    M. Duffield, ‘Ethiopia: The Unconquered Lion of Africa’, Command Magazine (1990), Vol. 4, p. 78.Google Scholar
  4. 24.
    Quoted in H.H. Brett, ‘Chemicals and Aircraft’, Chemical Warfare Bulletin (1937), Vol. 23, pp. 151–152Google Scholar
  5. 25.
    Piers Brandon, The Dark Valley, Cambridge (1938), p. 74.Google Scholar
  6. 26.
    D.K. Clark, Effectiveness of Toxic Weapons in the Italian-Ethiopian War, Bethesda: Operations Research Office (1959), p. 20.Google Scholar
  7. 28.
    J.C. Fuller, ‘Chemicals in Ethiopia’, Chemical Warfare Bulletin (1936), Vol. 22(3), p. 85.Google Scholar
  8. 36.
    SIPRI, Vol. 1, p. 194; 5250th Technical Intelligence Company, The Use of Poison Gas by Imperial Japanese Army in China, 1937–1945; Tokyo: TIC (1946).Google Scholar
  9. 37.
    A.A. Stepanov, Chemical Weapons and Principles of Antichemical Defence, Moscow (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 52.
    Office of the Chief, Chemical Warfare Service, New Gas Detector Kit, Washington DC: CWS (12 September 1944), Information.Google Scholar
  11. 56.
    H. Jones, The War in the Air, Oxford, Vol. 5 (1935).Google Scholar
  12. 58.
    G.H. Quester, Deterrence Before Hiroshima, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  13. 59.
    F.J. Brown, Chemical Warfare: A Study in Restraints, Princeton (1968).Google Scholar
  14. 60.
    See, for example, H. Liepmann, Death from the Skies: A Study of Gas and Microbiological Warfare, London (1937)Google Scholar
  15. N. Angell, The Menace to our National Defence, London (1934).Google Scholar
  16. 61.
    P. Noel-Baker, Disarmament, London (1926).Google Scholar
  17. 63.
    A.A. Fries, ‘Chemical Warfare Past and Future’, Chemical Warfare, 5(1) (1920), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  18. 64.
    Anon., ‘Chemical Warfare Bombing Tests on Warships’, Chemical Warfare, 6(10) (1921), p. 6.Google Scholar
  19. 65.
    W. Irwin, The Next War: An Appeal to Common Sense, New York (1921).Google Scholar
  20. 68.
    H. Swyter, Proceedings of the Conference on Chemical and Biological Warfare (25 July 1969), American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Salk Institute, Brookline, MA (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Coleman 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Coleman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations