The First World War

  • Kim Coleman


The most persistent assumption underlying the decisions taken by the great powers in July and August 1914 was the illusion that the ensuing war would be short. The thinking behind this was relatively simple: modern methods of transportation and communications created unprecedented opportunities for speed and mobility in attack. In fact, all the war plans of the great powers before 1914 hinged on railway timetables and the rapid deployment of men in the field. Indeed Kaiser Wilhelm II assured his troops they would be ‘home before the leaves fall’ and certainly troops of all nations believed ‘it will all be over by Christmas’. Young men went off adventurously, glad to change their lives, to travel. They were answering the call of duty and were sure they would soon be back home crowned with victory; in London, Berlin and Paris they left singing and exuberant. But, the dream became a nightmare. The belief in speed was crucial. The most famous stratagem, the German Schlieffen Plan called for a lightning attack on France — but this was not exceptional. France had Plan 17 which proposed a quick strike through Alsace; Russia’s Plan B called for Russia to seize the offensive and attack through Poland and Britain’s planning for the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) assumed it must land in France within days of war being declared for it to be effective.


Chemical Weapon Chemical Warfare Agent Hague Convention Protective Mask Western Front 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wilfred Owen, Dulce et Decorum Est (It is a wonderful and great honour to die for your country). Reproduced in full in, David Roberts, Minds at War, Saxon Books (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    For a detailed discussion of this shell type see, Anon., Army and Navy Journal (8 May 1915), p. 1141.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    Eric von Ludendorff, War Memories, Berlin (1919).Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    H. Schwarte, Die Technik Im Weltkrieg, Berlin: Mittler (1920), p. 74.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    Rudolf Hanslian, Der deutsche Gasangriff bei Ypern am 22 April 1915, Berlin: Verlag Gasschultz und Luftschutz (1934), pp. 10–12.Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    Elmer Cotton in Malcolm Brown, Tommy Goes to War, J.M. Dent & Sons (1978). p. 170.Google Scholar
  7. 23.
    Sir J.E. Edmonds, Military Operations: France and Belgium, London, Vol. iii (1927), pp. 163–164.Google Scholar
  8. 29.
    W.G. McPherson et al. [Official] History of the Great War: Medical Services, Vol. 2, ‘Diseases of the War’, London (1923).Google Scholar
  9. 31.
    C.H. Foulkes, Gas! The Story of the Special Brigade, London (1936).Google Scholar
  10. 41.
    C.B. Carter, Porton Down: 75 Years of Chemical and Biological Research, London: HMSO (1992), p. 10.Google Scholar
  11. 43.
    German Sixth Army War Diary, Extracts in Rudolf Hanslian, Der Chemische Krieg, Berlin: E.S. Mittler und Sohn (1927), pp. 86–98.Google Scholar
  12. 51.
    T. Watkins, J.C. Cackett and R.G. Hall, Chemicals, Pyrotechnics and the Fireworks Industry, Oxford: Permagon Press (1968), p. 9.Google Scholar
  13. 53.
    Ulrich Miller-Kiel, Die Chemischer Waffe im Weltkrieg und Jetzt, Berlin: Verlag Chemie (1932), p. 49.Google Scholar
  14. 59.
    Pierre Berton, Vimy, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart (1986), p. 115.Google Scholar
  15. 69.
    A.M. Prentiss, Chemicals in War: A Treatise on Chemical Warfare, New York: McGraw-Hill (1937), p. 58.Google Scholar
  16. 72.
    For more information on German casualty figures see, W.G. Macpherson etal. [Official] History of The Great War: Medical Services: Diseases of the War, London (1923), Vol. 2, especially Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  17. 75.
    J.D.S. Haldane, Callinicus: A Defence of Chemical Warfare, London (1925), p. 74; Haldane also describes in this book how ‘someone placed a drop of mustard gas on the chair of the Director of the British Chemical Warfare Department. He ate his meals off the mantelpiece for a month!’Google Scholar
  18. 79.
    American humorist Will Rogers cited in H.E. Galarraga, ‘The Evolution of the Protective Mask for Military Purposes: Inception to World War I’, Greenwich Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1) (2001), pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
  19. 83.
    Robert Graves, Goodbye to All That, New York: Doubleday (1957), p. 95.Google Scholar
  20. 84.
    Wilhelm Hasse-Lampe, Handbuch für das Grubenrettungswesen (International), Bande 1, Lübeck: Dräger (1924), p. 80.Google Scholar
  21. 85.
    For further details of the mine galleries dug under the front-line see, A. Barrie, War Underground, Staplehurst: Spellmount (1962, 2000).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Coleman 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Coleman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations