Advertisement

Abstract

Sentimental literature was characterised by an interest in feelings and emotional states. Much of this literature is devoted to stories of woe and moments of distress, and the quintessential sentimental moment is when one or more of the characters begin to weep. At these moments, it is often made clear that the reader is supposed to weep too, and sentimental authors put a great deal of effort into bringing this about. The strategies they used are here called sentimental rhetoric, or the rhetoric of sensibility, and it is the purpose of this book to show how that rhetoric worked in the debate over the slave trade. These are loose terms, however, and include a great number of rhetorical procedures that were familiar from antiquity, as well as some that seemed more in tune with the eighteenth century. Yet the theory of rhetoric, as well as its day-to-day practice by writers and orators, was being reappraised in the eighteenth century, to the extent that modern critics have come to recognise a group of approaches to rhetoric that can usefully be considered under the umbrella of the ‘new rhetorics’. I argue that the rhetoric of sensibility is located within this group, and this chapter examines in outline the scope and the philosophical underpinnings of this rhetoric, before concluding by identifying its main characteristics, and introducing terms for several of its proofs and tropes.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century False Sensibility Slave Trade Moral Sentiment Late Eighteenth Century 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Paul Langford, A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 461.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John Brewer, The Pleasures of the Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century (London: HarperCollins, 1997), p. 3 and (for a discussion of sensibility), pp. 113–22.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    For a clear discussion, see Gillian Skinner, Sensibility and Economics in the Novel, 1740–1800: The Price of a Tear (London: Macmillan, 1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    An argument made by Norbert Elias in The Civilizing Process, trans. Edmund Jephcott, 2 vols (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978). Elias’s argument covers the whole of Europe in the early modern and modern periods and thus tends to generalise about complex social and psychological developments in communities with very different histories.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Adam Smith’s contribution to ‘the invention of English literature’ is explored in the context of the Scottish Enlightenment by Robert Crawford in Devolving English Literature, 2nd edn (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Adam Smith, Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, ed. J.C. Bryce and A.S. Skinner (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 26.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    John Holmes, The Art of Rhetoric Made Easy; or, the Elements of Oratory Briefly Stated, and Fitted for the Practise of the Studious Youth of Great-Britain and Ireland (London: A. Parker, A. Bettesworth, and C. Hitch, 1739), ‘The Preface’.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Useful introductions to classical rhetoric can be found in: George Kennedy, A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
  9. Peter Dixon, Rhetoric (London: Methuen, 1971)Google Scholar
  10. Brian Vickers, In Defence of Rhetoric (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1988)Google Scholar
  11. and Thomas M. Conley, Rhetoric in the European Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Dixon, Rhetoric, and Robert Cockcroft and Susan M. Cockcroft, Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric (London: Macmillan, 1992), provide short but clear introductions to the rules of rhetoric for the modern reader.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Thomas Farnaby, Troposchematologia: Maximam Partem ex Indice Rhetorico, FARNABII Deprornpta, Additus Insuper Anglicanis Exemplis. In usem Scholce Regice Grammaticalis apud St. Edmundi Burgum (London: Ri. Royston, 1648).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    See Crawford, pp. 29–30, and Wilbur Samuel Howell, Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971), pp. 152–9.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    My discussion of the new rhetoric owes much to two works: Howell’s, Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric; and Michael G. Moran, ed., Eighteenth-Century British and American Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), ed. Roger Woolhouse (London: Penguin, 1997), p. 452.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brian Vickers, ‘The Royal Society and English Prose Style: A Reassessment’, Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth, Language Change in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century (Los Angeles, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1985), pp. 3–76, p. 3.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilbur Samuel Howell, >Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500–1700 (New York: Russell & Russell, 1961), p. 366. See pp. 364–83 for an extended discussion.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aristotle, On Rhetoric, trans. George A. Kennedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 40.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    David Hume, ‘Of Eloquence’, Essays, 2nd edn (1742), reprinted in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary (1777), ed. Eugene F. Miller (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985), pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Adam Potkay, The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994), pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1756), ed. Adam Phillips (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 41.Google Scholar
  23. 30.
    John Rae, Life of Adam Smith (London: Macmillan, 1895), p. 30.Google Scholar
  24. 31.
    For discussion, see Vivienne Brown, Adam Smith’s Discourse: Canonicity, Commerce and Conscience (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 14; H. Lewis Ulman, ‘Adam Smith’, in Moran, p. 213.Google Scholar
  25. 37.
    Hugh Blair, Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, 2 vols (London: W. Strahan & Thomas Cadell, 1783), I, p. 381.Google Scholar
  26. 46.
    Hannah More, Slavery, A Poem (London: T. Cadell, 1788), p. 54.Google Scholar
  27. 47.
    Hannah More, Sacred Dramas; Chiefly Intended for Young Persons: The Subjects Taken from the Bible. To Which is Added, Sensibility, a Poem, 2nd edn (London: T. Cadell, 1782).Google Scholar
  28. 48.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ‘Lecture on the Slave Trade’, Lectures 1795: On Politics and Religion, ed. Lewis Patton and Peter Mann (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971), pp. 231–51, p. 249.Google Scholar
  29. 50.
    The sentimental parable could be seen as an example of Laura Brown’s notion of the ‘cultural fable’ which ‘can be said to tell a story whose protagonist is an emanation of contemporary experience and whose action reflects an imagina-tive negotiation with that experience’. Laura Brown, Fables of Modernity: Literature and Culture in the English Eighteenth Century (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001), p. 3.Google Scholar
  30. 52.
    Henry Fielding, Joseph Andrews (1742), Ch. 12, ed. R.F. Brissenden (London: Penguin, 1977), pp. 67–73.Google Scholar
  31. 53.
    Laurence Sterne, ‘Philanthropy Recommended’, The Sermons of Mr. Yorick (1760), 2 vols (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1927), I, pp. 25–36, p. 28.Google Scholar
  32. 55.
    For a recent discussion of the relationship between slavery, colonisation, and ideas of the ‘domestic’ in both the national and personal senses, see Sharon Harrow, Adventures in Domesticity: Gender and Colonial Adulteration in Eighteenth-Century British Literature (New York: AMS Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  33. 57.
    Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), ed. Conor Cruise O’Brien (London: Penguin, 1969), pp. 168–70.Google Scholar
  34. 61.
    Eric Erämetsä, A Study of the Word ‘Sentimental’ and of Other Linguistic Charac teristics of the Eighteenth-Century Sentimentalism in England, Annales Academiae Scicn-tiarum Fennicae, Series 13, 74 (Helsinki: Helsingen Lüke Kinjapaino Oy, 1951).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Brycchan Carey 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brycchan Carey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations