Abstract
Like Hegel, Marx criticises political economy both for failing to relate its insights to a broader set of social concerns and for failing to recognise its nature as a historically grounded system of thought and practice. Also, like Hegel Marx sees these two failures as interlinked. Classical economic thought was unable adequately to conceptualise the relationship between economic developments and political and social factors because of the way in which it viewed relationships and categories specific to capitalism as having wider historical validity. Conversely, the inability of classical political economy to recognise that its insights were temporally bounded arose from its lack of attention to the context in which those insights were embedded.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arthur, C. (1979) ‘Dialectics and Labour’ in J. Mepham and D. Hillel-Ruben (1979) (eds.), Issues in Marxist Philosophy: Volume 1 Dialectics and Method. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
Banaji, J. (1979) ‘From the Commodity to Capital: Hegel’s Dialectic in Marx’s Capital’, in D. Elson (ed.), Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism. London: CSE Books.
Bhaskar, R. (1975) A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books.
Carver, T. (1998) The Postmodern Marx. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dobb, M. (1937) Political Economy and Capitalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Fine, B. (ed.) (1986) The Value Dimension: Marx versus Ricardo and Sraffa. London: Routledge.
Fine, B. and L. Harris (1979) Rereading Capital. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Kay, G. (1979) ‘Why Labour is the Starting Point of Capital’, in D. Elson (ed.), Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism. London: CSE Books.
Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse, translated by M. Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1976) Capital: Volume 1, translated by B. Fowkes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Meek, R. (1973) Studies in the Labour Theory of Value, 2nd edition. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Murray, P. (1993) ‘The Necessity of Money: How Hegel Helped Marx Surpass Ricardo’s Theory of Value’ in F. Moseley (ed.), Marx’s Method in Capital: A Re-examination. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
Rubin, I. (1978) ‘Abstract Labour and Value in Marx’s System,’ Capital and Class, no. 5.
Sayer, D. (1979) Marx’s Method: Ideology, Science and Critique in ‘Capital’. Hassochs: Harvester Press.
Smith, T. (1990) The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. New York: SUNY Press.
Steedman, I. (1977) Marx After Sraffa. London: New Left Books.
Sweezy, P. (1942) The Theory of Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Gary Browning and Andrew Kilmister
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Browning, G., Kilmister, A. (2006). Marx and Critical Political Economy. In: Critical and Post-Critical Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501522_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501522_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42765-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50152-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)