Skip to main content

Using Official Histories and Public Records to Present Britain’s Past to a Global Audience

  • Chapter
Using History, Making British Policy
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

In October 1957 a lengthy Cabinet Office minute, entitled ‘The Historical Sense in Departments and so forth’, reflected the emerging debate within Whitehall about the role of history in government.1 Written by Burke Trend, the deputy secretary to the Cabinet (1956–59), this minute fed into ongoing exchanges between ministers and senior officials about future policy concerning a range of history-related issues:

  • public records, most notably the length of the closed period as well as access to and citation of closed documents by former ministers and officials when writing their memoirs;

  • the future of official histories, including the proposal to move on from the Second World War to the post-1945 period;

  • the case for departments to publish edited collections of documents along the lines of the Foreign Office’s Documents on British Foreign Policy (DBFP);

  • the fate of the Cabinet Office’s Historical Section, which held responsibility for official histories and related matters; and

  • history’s policymaking potential within the governmental machine in terms of using confidential internal histories to support a department’s everyday work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Burke Trend to Brook, 4 Oct. 1957, Trend to Brook, 21 Oct. 1957, CAB103/562; Richard Aldrich, ‘Policing the past: official history, secrecy and British intelligence since 1945’, English Historical Review, CXIX (2004), 935–9, 951.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Wilson to J. Nunn, 31 Jan. 1967, CAB103/621; Donald C. Watt, ‘Contemporary history: problems and perspectives’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, III (1965–69), 512; Hay, ‘British historians’, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jeffrey Grey, ‘Introduction’, in J. Grey (ed.), The Last Word?: Essays on Official History in the United States and British Commonwealth (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brook to Heads of Departments, 5 Dec. 1957, CAB103/562. On Brook, see Kevin Theakston, Leadership in Whitehall (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 95–126.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hancock to Gowing, 14 Nov. 1986, Hancock to Richard A. Chapman, 29 May 1985, MG Corresp. Hancock; W.K. Hancock, Country and Calling (London: Faber and Faber, 1954), pp. 196–7. Henceforth Professor Sir Keith Hancock will be referred to as ‘Keith Hancock’ to avoid confusion with ‘David Hancock’.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robin Higham, ‘Introduction’, in R. Higham (ed.), Official Histories: Essays and Bibliographies from around the World (Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University Library, 1970), pp. 1–4; Sir Keith Hancock, ‘British civil histories of the Second World War’, in Higham (ed.), Official Histories, pp. 518–25; Hay, ‘British historians’, pp. 39–55; Sir J.R.M. Butler, ‘The British military histories of the war of 1939–45’, in Higham (ed.), Official Histories, pp. 511–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. On the First World War, see Andrew Green, Writing the Great War: Sir James Edmonds and the Official Histories, 1915–1948 (London: Frank Cass, 2003), pp. 5–20, 195–208.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. W.K. Hancock and M.M. Gowing, British War Economy (London: HMSO, 1949), p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.I. Savage, Inland Transport (London: HMSO, 1957), pp. xv–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herbert Butterfield, History and Human Relations (London: Collins, 1951), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Margaret Gowing, ‘Hancock: some reminiscences’, Historical Studies, 13 (1968), 303.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C(65) 114, 27 July 1965, CAB129/122, Pt. 1, fol. 195; Minute 7, ACPR Meeting, 13 July 1964, CAB21/5230; Watt, ‘Contemporary history’, 512; Llewellyn Woodward, ‘The study of contemporary history’, Journal of Contemporary History, 1 (1966), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minutes of Meeting, 14 Jan. 1964, CAB21/5230; W. McIndoe, 11 Jan. 1966, CAB103/598; Rohan Butler, 3 Feb. 1964, FO370/2771/LS17. Foreign Office (FO) records are located at TNA. On the historians’s campaign, see H.G. Nicholas to Cary, 12 Nov. 1963, CAB21/5230; Butler, 21 Nov. 1963, FO370/2725/LS17; Colin Holmes, ‘Government files and privileged access’, Social History, 6 (1981), 335; Watt, ‘Contemporary History’, 515–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charles Webster and Noble Frankland, The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany, 1939–1945, vols 1–4 (London: HMSO, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clifton Child, 5 Jan. 1965, FO370/2811/LS23; D.C. Watt, ‘Restrictions on research: the Fifty-Year Rule and British foreign policy’, International Affairs, 41 (1965), 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Trend to Nunn and Woods, 11 Feb. 1965, CAB21/5230; Harold Wilson, The Labour Government, 1964–1970: A Personal Record (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson & Michael Joseph, 1971), pp. 203–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trend to Wilson, 11 Apr. 1968, PREM13/2144. Douglas-Home’s membership is interesting given his limited vision of official histories: ‘I do not quite see the point of the 30 years rule if Official Historians have access to all the material long before it is up’: quoted, D.R. Thorpe, Alec Douglas-Home (London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1996), p. 395.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, n.d. (Apr. 1968), PREM13/2144. Wilson specifically mentioned this topic in his memoirs: Wilson, The Labour Government, p. 204; Alec Cairncross (ed.), The Wilson Years: A Treasury Diary, 1964–1969 (London: The Historians’ Press, 1997), p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quoted, Butler, 18 Oct. 1966, FO370/2906/LS13. See Peter J. Beck, ‘The conflict potential of the “dots on the map”’, The International History Review, 13 (1991), 124–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sir John Hoskyns, ‘Conservatism is not enough’, Political Quarterly, 55 (1984), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Peter J. Beck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beck, P.J. (2006). Using Official Histories and Public Records to Present Britain’s Past to a Global Audience. In: Using History, Making British Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501287_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501287_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52409-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50128-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics