Abstract
In October 1957 a lengthy Cabinet Office minute, entitled ‘The Historical Sense in Departments and so forth’, reflected the emerging debate within Whitehall about the role of history in government.1 Written by Burke Trend, the deputy secretary to the Cabinet (1956–59), this minute fed into ongoing exchanges between ministers and senior officials about future policy concerning a range of history-related issues:
-
public records, most notably the length of the closed period as well as access to and citation of closed documents by former ministers and officials when writing their memoirs;
-
the future of official histories, including the proposal to move on from the Second World War to the post-1945 period;
-
the case for departments to publish edited collections of documents along the lines of the Foreign Office’s Documents on British Foreign Policy (DBFP);
-
the fate of the Cabinet Office’s Historical Section, which held responsibility for official histories and related matters; and
-
history’s policymaking potential within the governmental machine in terms of using confidential internal histories to support a department’s everyday work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Burke Trend to Brook, 4 Oct. 1957, Trend to Brook, 21 Oct. 1957, CAB103/562; Richard Aldrich, ‘Policing the past: official history, secrecy and British intelligence since 1945’, English Historical Review, CXIX (2004), 935–9, 951.
S. Wilson to J. Nunn, 31 Jan. 1967, CAB103/621; Donald C. Watt, ‘Contemporary history: problems and perspectives’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, III (1965–69), 512; Hay, ‘British historians’, p. 39.
Jeffrey Grey, ‘Introduction’, in J. Grey (ed.), The Last Word?: Essays on Official History in the United States and British Commonwealth (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), p. ix.
Brook to Heads of Departments, 5 Dec. 1957, CAB103/562. On Brook, see Kevin Theakston, Leadership in Whitehall (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 95–126.
Hancock to Gowing, 14 Nov. 1986, Hancock to Richard A. Chapman, 29 May 1985, MG Corresp. Hancock; W.K. Hancock, Country and Calling (London: Faber and Faber, 1954), pp. 196–7. Henceforth Professor Sir Keith Hancock will be referred to as ‘Keith Hancock’ to avoid confusion with ‘David Hancock’.
Robin Higham, ‘Introduction’, in R. Higham (ed.), Official Histories: Essays and Bibliographies from around the World (Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University Library, 1970), pp. 1–4; Sir Keith Hancock, ‘British civil histories of the Second World War’, in Higham (ed.), Official Histories, pp. 518–25; Hay, ‘British historians’, pp. 39–55; Sir J.R.M. Butler, ‘The British military histories of the war of 1939–45’, in Higham (ed.), Official Histories, pp. 511–14.
On the First World War, see Andrew Green, Writing the Great War: Sir James Edmonds and the Official Histories, 1915–1948 (London: Frank Cass, 2003), pp. 5–20, 195–208.
W.K. Hancock and M.M. Gowing, British War Economy (London: HMSO, 1949), p. ix.
C.I. Savage, Inland Transport (London: HMSO, 1957), pp. xv–xvi.
Herbert Butterfield, History and Human Relations (London: Collins, 1951), p. 186.
Margaret Gowing, ‘Hancock: some reminiscences’, Historical Studies, 13 (1968), 303.
C(65) 114, 27 July 1965, CAB129/122, Pt. 1, fol. 195; Minute 7, ACPR Meeting, 13 July 1964, CAB21/5230; Watt, ‘Contemporary history’, 512; Llewellyn Woodward, ‘The study of contemporary history’, Journal of Contemporary History, 1 (1966), 3–5.
Minutes of Meeting, 14 Jan. 1964, CAB21/5230; W. McIndoe, 11 Jan. 1966, CAB103/598; Rohan Butler, 3 Feb. 1964, FO370/2771/LS17. Foreign Office (FO) records are located at TNA. On the historians’s campaign, see H.G. Nicholas to Cary, 12 Nov. 1963, CAB21/5230; Butler, 21 Nov. 1963, FO370/2725/LS17; Colin Holmes, ‘Government files and privileged access’, Social History, 6 (1981), 335; Watt, ‘Contemporary History’, 515–18.
Charles Webster and Noble Frankland, The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany, 1939–1945, vols 1–4 (London: HMSO, 1961).
Clifton Child, 5 Jan. 1965, FO370/2811/LS23; D.C. Watt, ‘Restrictions on research: the Fifty-Year Rule and British foreign policy’, International Affairs, 41 (1965), 89–95.
Trend to Nunn and Woods, 11 Feb. 1965, CAB21/5230; Harold Wilson, The Labour Government, 1964–1970: A Personal Record (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson & Michael Joseph, 1971), pp. 203–4.
Trend to Wilson, 11 Apr. 1968, PREM13/2144. Douglas-Home’s membership is interesting given his limited vision of official histories: ‘I do not quite see the point of the 30 years rule if Official Historians have access to all the material long before it is up’: quoted, D.R. Thorpe, Alec Douglas-Home (London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1996), p. 395.
Wilson, n.d. (Apr. 1968), PREM13/2144. Wilson specifically mentioned this topic in his memoirs: Wilson, The Labour Government, p. 204; Alec Cairncross (ed.), The Wilson Years: A Treasury Diary, 1964–1969 (London: The Historians’ Press, 1997), p. 316.
Quoted, Butler, 18 Oct. 1966, FO370/2906/LS13. See Peter J. Beck, ‘The conflict potential of the “dots on the map”’, The International History Review, 13 (1991), 124–33.
Sir John Hoskyns, ‘Conservatism is not enough’, Political Quarterly, 55 (1984), 12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Peter J. Beck
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beck, P.J. (2006). Using Official Histories and Public Records to Present Britain’s Past to a Global Audience. In: Using History, Making British Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501287_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501287_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52409-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50128-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)