Abstract
In theory, the use of past experience recorded through history should enable ministers and officials to improve both policies and methods. For Peter Nailor, a historian with a background of working in government, history offered British policymakers the ability ‘to devise something better than a one-dimensional response’ to complex multi-dimensional problems:
More often than not, the problem that faces government today has its roots in the past; it has grown out of circumstances that will have created problems for governments before. And insofar as there will have been some discussion in the past about which of several optional policies to follow, it will be sensible to find out what the options were, and why one rather than another was chosen. When you have done that — which comes close to what social scientists call ‘policy analysis’ — it does not mean that you have either discovered, or eschewed, a novel solution. All it means is, to use a rather old-fashioned term — that you ‘have done your homework’.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Marian Clay, ‘Putting the records straight’, FCO Historical Branch Occasional Papers, 1 (1987), 5
James E. Hoare, ‘Present-day records: the prospects for future historians’, FCO Historical Branch Occasional Papers, 1 (1987), 54.
Lord Alan Bullock, Has History a Future? (Aspen: Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, 1977), p. 4.
See also Lord Alan Bullock, Has the Past Ceased to be Relevant? (Aspen: Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, 1986), pp. 20–2.
Richard Lavers, ‘The role of research analysts in the FCO’, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Research and Analytical Papers (London: FCO, 2001), pp. 1–4.
Alan Booth, ‘Inflation expectations, and the political economy of Conservative Britain, 1951–1964’, The Historical Journal, 43 (2000), 833–4, 840, 844. Pemberton, though citing them as sources, fails to develop the way in which THMs were intended to offer one way of codifying ‘the lessons of negative policy feedback’: Pemberton, Policy Learning, pp. 76, 113–4, 120, 129, 132–4.
L.S. Pressnell, External Economic Policy since the War, vol. 1 (London: HMSO, 1986), pp. xii, 370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Peter J. Beck
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beck, P.J. (2006). Making British Policy, Using and Ignoring History. In: Using History, Making British Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501287_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501287_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52409-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50128-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)