‘This is not happening’: The Multi-layered Ontology of The X-Files

  • Klaudia Seibel

Abstract

The X-Files has been one of the most popular American TV series, ‘a cult programme of the nineties’ (Curti 1998: 79) which also gained international popularity. It ran over nine seasons (from 10 September 1993 to 19 May 2002) and spawned one feature film (so far), a spin-off (The Lone Gunmen), several novelizations, a comic book series, a computer game, and a variety of tie-in merchandise. It focuses on two FBI agents1 and their hunt for ‘The Truth’. It follows in the tradition of the weekly cop series, with each episode representing (more or less) one case file.2 The agents investigating the X-files also try to expose an international conspiracy whose members attempt to hide ‘The Truth’ from the public and to destroy any evidence the investigators might have gathered. This ‘mythology’ forms an overarching storyline originating in the investigation into the abduction of Fox Mulder’s sister Samantha in 1973, 19 years before the beginning of the series’ action in 1992. The ramifications of this ‘mytharc’ not only shape those episodes explicitly dealing with it, but also reach into many stand-alone ‘monster-of-the-week’ episodes, giving The X-Files its ‘elliptical yet serial narrative structure’ (McLean 1998: 6).3

Keywords

Hunt Tempo Lost Stake Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badley, L. (1996) ‘The Rebirth of the Clinic: The Body as Alien in The X-Files’. In D. Lavery, A. Hague and M. Cartwright (1996a), op. cit.: 148–67.Google Scholar
  2. Bellon, J. (1999) ‘The Strange Discourse of The X-Files: What It Is, What It Does, and What Is at Stake’. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 16.2: 136–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booker, M. K. (2002) Strange TV: Innovative Television Series from The Twilight Zone to The X-Files. Westport/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, C. L. (2000) ‘Erasure: Alienation, Paranoia, and the Loss of Memory in The X-Files’. Camera Obscura 45 (=15.3): 194–225.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. E. (2001) ‘Alien(ating) Ideology and the American Media: Apprehending the Alien Image in Television Through The X-Files’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 4.3: 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatman, S. (1978) Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Curti, L. (1998) Female Stories, Female Bodies: Narrative, Identity and Representation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Genette, G. (1988) [1972] Narrative Discourse Revisited. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gomel, E. (1995) ‘Mystery, Apocalypse and Utopia: The Case of the Ontological Detective Story’. Science-Fiction Studies 22: 343–56.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, L. (1996) ‘“Last Week We Had an Omen”: The Mythological X-Files’. In D. Lavery, A. Hague and M. Cartwright (1996a) op. cit.: 77–98.Google Scholar
  11. Kaye, M. (1996) ‘Is the Truth Out There? Boundaries, The X Files and the World Wide Web’. Deep South 2.3. (http://www.otago.ac.nz/DeepSouth/vol2no3/mirand.html [30 June 2004]).Google Scholar
  12. Kellner, D. (1999) ‘The X-Files and the Aesthetics and Politics of Postmodern Pop’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57.2: 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubek, E. (1996) ‘“You only Expose Your Father”: The Imaginary, Voyeurism, and the Symbolic Order in The X-Files’. In D. Lavery, A. Hague and M. Cartwright (1996a), op. cit.: 168–204.Google Scholar
  14. Lacey, N. (2000) Narrative and Genre: Key Concepts in Media Studies. Basingstoke/ London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Lavery, D., A. Hague and M. Cartwright (eds) (1996a) ‘Deny All Knowledge’: Reading The X-Files: The Television Series. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  16. ——(1996b) ‘Introduction: Generation X — The X-Files and the Cultural Moment’. In D. Lavery, A. Hague and M. Cartwright (1996a), op. cit.: 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. McLean, A. L. (1998) ‘Media Effects: Marshall McLuhan, Television Culture, and The X-Files’. Film Quarterly 51.4: 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reeves, J. L., M. C. Rodgers and M. Epstein (1996) ‘Rewriting Popularity: The Cult Files’. In D. Lavery, A. Hague and M. Cartwright (1996a), op. cit.: 22–35.Google Scholar
  19. Ryan, M.-L. (1991) Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ——(2001) Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Surkamp, C. (2002) ‘Narratologie und possible-worlds theory: Narrative Texte als alternative Welten’. In A. Nünning and V. Nünning (eds), Neue Ansätze in der Erzähltheorie. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 153–83.Google Scholar
  22. Todorov, T. (1988) [1966] ‘The Typology of Detective Fiction’. In D. Lodge (ed.), Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. London/New York: Longman, 158–65.Google Scholar
  23. Wilcox, R. and J. P. Williams (1996) ‘“What Do You Think?” The X-Files, Liminality, and Gender Pleasure’. In D. Lavery, A. Hague and M. Cartwright (1996a), op. cit.: 99–120.Google Scholar
  24. Wildermuth, M. (1999) ‘The Edge of Chaos: Structural Conspiracy and Epistemology in The X-Files’. Journal of Popular Film and Television 26.4: 146–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Klaudia Seibel 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaudia Seibel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations