Experiences of Empiricism

  • Matthew J. A. Green

Abstract

Blake’s annotations to The Works of Sir Joshua Reynolds present his most overt declarations against the epistemology that he associates with Locke, Newton and Bacon. The fact that he responds to the philosophy behind Reynolds’ aesthetics is doubly significant. Not only does it say something about his response to philosophical issues, which is primarily artistic, but it also indicates his sense that art, and the judgement that assigns it value cannot be disentangled from the philosophical, or indeed political, frameworks within which it is produced. Art must not only be pleasing to the eye, but it must be intellectually and politically sound, an attitude that requires us to pay particular attention to the philosophical debates and positionings embedded throughout the illuminated books, no less than in the annotations, catalogues and letters that have survived alongside them.

Keywords

Burning Corn Milling Posit Ghost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    James Hindmarsh, A New Dictionary of Correspondences, Representation, &c. or the Spiritual Significations of Words, Sentences, &c. As Used in the Sacred Scriptures ([London]: Robert Hindmarsh, 1794), p. 239.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Jean H. Hagstrum, ‘William Blake Rejects the Enlightenment’, in Critical Essays on William Blake, ed. Hazard Adams (Boston, MA: G.K. Hall, 1991), pp. 67–78 (p. 69).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Paul Ricoeur, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blarney (London: University of Chicago Press, 1992), pp. 125–7Google Scholar
  4. Ian Hacking, ‘Memory Sciences, Memory Politics’, Tense Past: Cultural Essays in Trauma and Memory (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 67–87 (pp. 80–1).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    The authorship of the English ‘translation’ of Aphorisms is itself a matter of debate as the translator, Blake’s friend Fuseli, took certain creative liberties with the text. Blake may well have been aware of Fuseli’s inventiveness, though, as one who ‘cannot concieve the Divinity of the […] Bible to consist either in who they were written by or at what time’ (Annotations to Watson, p. 22; E618), Blake is likely to have regarded this as of little consequence. In any case, Blake addresses Lavater by name throughout his annotations, and following his lead I too will refer to Lavater as the work’s author. For a detailed discussion of this matter, see Carol Louise Hall, Blake and Fuseli: A Study in the Transmission of Ideas (London and New York: Garland Publishing, 1985)Google Scholar
  6. R.J. Shroyer’s introduction to the Scholar’s facsimile of Blake’s copy of Aphorisms (Delmar, New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdman links these comments with Johnson’s imprisonment as part of his larger argument concerning Blake’s fears about persecution for publication (Blake: Prophet Against Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977; repr. London: Dover, 1991), pp. 301–2).Google Scholar
  8. While Erdman’s suggestion that the withdrawal of The French Revolution entailed the ‘withdrawal from any audience beyond a few uncritical or even uncomprehending friends’ has been challenged by subsequent scholars, the suggestion that he was deeply affected by the persecutions of the 1790s seems undeniable (Prophet, p. 153). For recent re-evaluations of Blake’s potential audience, see David Worrall, ‘Blake and 1790s Plebeian Radical Culture’, in Blake in the Nineties, ed. Steve Clark and David Worrall (London: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    The Politics of Friendship, trans. George Collins (London: Verso, 1997), p. 72.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    The Gift of Death, trans. David Wills (London: University of Chicago Press, 1995), p. 41.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Peter Otto, Constructive Vision and Visionary Deconstruction: Los, Eternity, and the Productions of Time in the Later Poetry of William Blake (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 4–19.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    These topics have been discussed at length by Morris Eaves, William Blake’s Theory of Art (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1982), pp. 152–3Google Scholar
  13. Robert N. Essick, William Blake and the Language of Adam (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 189–94Google Scholar
  14. Edward Larrissy, ‘Spectral Imposition and Visionary Imposition: Printing and Repetition in Blake’, in Blake in the Nineties, ed. Steve Clark and David Worrall (London: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 61–77 (pp. 63–4, 68–9)Google Scholar
  15. 12.
    Nicholas M. Williams, Ideology and Utopia in the Poetry of William Blake (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 5.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, trans. Peggy Kamuf, intro. Bernd Magnus and Stephen Cullenberg (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 136.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Much has already been written on Blake’s concept of the spectre, and the following studies provide detailed discussions of the topic: Steve Vine, Blake’s Poetry: Spectral Visions (London: Macmillan, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lorraine Clark, Blake, Kierkegaard, and the Spectre of Dialectic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson Hilton, Literal Imagination: Blake’s Vision of Words (Berkeley: California University Press, 1983), pp. 147–72. To my knowledge, little has been written to date comparing Blake’s spectre with that encountered in Specters of Marx, but see Colebrook below.Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Claire Colebrook provides an informative and useful discussion of Blake, Derrida and the (Derridean) spectre, which discusses the conjuration and counter-conjuration characteristic of enlightenment and post-enlightenment thought (‘The New Jerusalem and the New International’, Parallax, 7 (2001), pp. 17–28). Colebrook’s discussion differs in focus from the one presented here, though her readings converge with mine in a number of significant ways, as noted below.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    Walter Benjamin, ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, in Illuminations, ed. and intro. Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn, repr. (New York: Schocken Books, 1969), pp. 253–64 (p. 256).Google Scholar
  22. 18.
    G.E. Bentley Jr., Blake Books (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977), p. 692.Google Scholar
  23. 19.
    An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), §2.1.3–4.Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    Thomas R. Frosch, The Awakening of Albion: The Renovation of the Body in the Poetry of William Blake (London: Cornell University Press, 1974), pp. 26–7, 31.Google Scholar
  25. 21.
    Joseph Viscomi, ‘In the Caves of Heaven and Hell: Swedenborg and Printmaking in Blake’s Marriage’, in Blake in the Nineties, ed. Steve Clark and David Worrall (London: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 27–60 (p. 44).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 23.
    Benedict de Spinoza, Ethics, ed. and trans. Edwin Curley (London: Penguin, 1996), 3.P53.Dem. References to this text are to book number, proposition or definition number and either demonstration, corollary, scholium, or explanation.Google Scholar
  27. 24.
    Gilles Deleuze, Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, trans. Robert Hurley (San Francisco: City Light Books, 1988), p. 18.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    Mary Lynn Johnson, ‘Blake, Democritus, and the ‘“Fluxions of the Atom”: Some Contexts for Materialist Critiques’, in Historicizing Blake, ed. Steve Clark and David Worrall (London: Macmillan, 1994), pp. 105–24.Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    Morton D. Paley, Energy and the Imagination: A Study of the Development of Blake’s Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    See also: Peter A. Schock, ‘The Marriage of Heaven and Hell: Blake’s Myth of Satan and its Cultural Matrix’, ELH, 60 (1993), pp. 441–70 (pp. 443, 457–8)Google Scholar
  31. John Beer, ‘Influence and Independence in Blake’, in Interpreting Blake, ed. Michael Phillips (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp. 196–261 (p. 223).Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    Rodney M. Baine and Mary R. Baine, ‘Blake’s Inflammable Gas’, Blake Newsletter, 10 (1976), pp. 51–2 (p. 51)Google Scholar
  33. William Nicholson, An Introduction to Natural Philosophy, 2nd edn, 2 vols (London: J. Johnson, 1787), I, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
  34. 30.
    Joseph Priestley, Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit (London: J. Johnson, 1777), p. 49.Google Scholar
  35. 32.
    Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [1751] 1991), p. 309; see also Priestley, Corruptions, p. 54.Google Scholar
  36. 33.
    Glausser remarks that Blake ‘can embrace Paine’s politics more easily than his religion’ (p. 8). Similarly, Worrall notes that whereas Visions demonstrates Painite ideals of liberalism and anti-colonialism, texts such as Urizen, All Religions and No Natural Religion demonstrate a disillusionment with Paine (David Worrall, ‘Alternative Europes: Blake and London Print Subcultures’, Blake, Nation and Empire (Tate Gallery Conference, 8–9 December 2000)).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Matthew JA Green 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. A. Green

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations