Skip to main content

Imprints, Self-Reinforcement and Active Reinforcement: The Case of Corporate Value Statements

  • Chapter
Self-Reinforcing Processes in and among Organizations

Abstract

The concept of organizational imprinting (Stinchcombe, 1965) refers to the long-term effects of founding conditions on an organization’s structure, strategy, and other features. While Stinchcombe’s original work mainly referred to overall social structures in the new firm’s environment, more recent research has highlighted the agency-driven nature of imprinting processes (Johnson, 2007) and particularly emphasized the role of firm founders on such processes (Boeker, 1989). Recent research on imprinting has also emphasized that the birth of a firm is not the only point in time when imprinting may occur (Van Driel and Dolfsma, 2010). From the very beginning, imprinting research has distinguished between the imprinting process as such and the retention of imprints through traditionalizing forces during later phases of the firm’s life cycle (Stinchcombe, 1965). In this chapter we focus on the retention and the possible reinforcement of imprints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, S. and Whetten, D., 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, pp. 263–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K., 1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, pp. 116–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., 1994. Increasing Returns and Path-dependency in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. N., Hannan, M. T. and Burton, M. D., 1999. Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. American Sociological Review, 64 (4), pp. 527–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W., 1989. Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3), pp. 489–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boers, B. and Brunninge, O., 2011. Towards an inclusion of founders and founding processes in organizational identity research: The case of Rheinische Post. JIBS Working Papers No. 2011–11. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunninge, O., 2009. Using history in organizations: How managers make purposeful reference to history in strategy processes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22 (1), pp. 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75 (2), pp. 332–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), pp. 532–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B., 1990. Linking founding team, strategy, environment and growth among US semiconductor ventures 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), pp. 504–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, P., 1986. The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 7 (2), pp. 117–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G. and Pistrui, J., 2002. Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15 (3), pp. 223–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. and Ogbonna, E., 1999. The strategic legacy of company founders. Long Range Planning, 32 (3), pp. 333–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humble, J., Jackson, D. and Thomson, A., 1994. The strategic power of corporate values. Long Range Planning, 27 (6), pp. 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Detert, G., Schroeder, R. and Mauriel, J., 2000. A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), pp. 850–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., 1987. Strategic Change and the Management Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R., 2008. Exploring Corporate Strategy. 8th edn Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V., 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (1), pp. 97–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R., 1979. Issues in the creation of organizations: Initiation, innovation and institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 22 (3), pp. 437–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R. and Bouchikhi, H., 1995. The dynamics of organizational development and change: How the past shapes the present and constrains the future. Organization Science, 6 (1), pp. 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R., Nedd, A. and Hinings, B., 1994. Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework. Management Science, 40 (1), pp. 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. and Ventresca, M., 2002. Social structure and organizations revisited. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19, pp. 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C. and Huang, Z., 2010. Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the US commercial banking industry. Academy ofManagement Journal, 53 (6), pp. 1441–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, F., and Lank, A., 1998. The Family Business: Its Governance for Sustainability. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. L., 1991. Core value statements: The corporate compass. Business Horizons, 34 (5), pp. 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J. and Waterman, R. H., 1982. In Search of Excellence–Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., 1985. “Examining change in the long-term context of culture and politics”, in J. M. Pennings and associates (eds) Organizational Strategy and Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 269–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., 1983. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12 (Summer), pp. 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P., 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., 2004. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17 (1), pp. 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L., 1983. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (3), pp. 339–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E., 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., 1981. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6 (4), pp. 577–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L., 1965. “Social structure and organizations”, in J. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 142–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J., 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34 (4), pp. 689–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, H. and Dolfsma, W. 2010. “Imprinting, path dependence and meta-routines: The genesis and development of the Toyota production system”, in G. Schreyögg and J. Sydow (eds) The Hidden Dynamics of Path Dependence: Institutions and Organizations. Houndmills: Palgrave, pp. 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Anna Blombäck, Olof Brunninge, and Anders Melander

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blombäck, A., Brunninge, O., Melander, A. (2013). Imprints, Self-Reinforcement and Active Reinforcement: The Case of Corporate Value Statements. In: Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. (eds) Self-Reinforcing Processes in and among Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392830_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics