Abstract
Events should be part and parcel of any analysis of path-dependent organizational processes, as it is a characteristic of such processes that events trigger self-reinforcing dynamics that may lock in organizations to a certain path (Sydow, Schreyögg, and Koch, 2009). Path dependence is thus distinguished from mere imprinting by initial conditions. Even when acknowledging that “in organizations initial choices and actions are embedded in routines and practices” (Sydow et al., 2009, p. 692), one can think of so many possible interactions within “a mixture of limiting conditions and chance events” (Martin and Sunley, 2006, p. 424) that generalizing about when and how events trigger paths seems futile. Still, the aim of this contribution is to specify the role of events in path-dependent organizational processes by exploring three different empirical cases. To clarify matters, below I will first distinguish two categories of events: external events and initial choices, whereby external events in interaction with initial conditions may lead to initial choices. In an event-based account of path dependence, a path literally consists of a succession of concrete steps: a sequence of events is one of the possible mechanisms giving continuity to paths (Beyer, 2010). Early events may trigger path-dependent processes by both reactive and reinforcing sequences as conceived by Mahoney (2000).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, B. A., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99 (March), pp. 116–31.
Bennett, A. and Elman, C., 2006. Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14 (3), pp. 250–67
Berezin, M., 2009. “Events as templates of possibility”, in J. C. Alexander, R. Jacobs, and P. Smith (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 613–35.
Berthod, O., 2011. On institutions, paths and routes set in stone: The construction of a bridge as a case ofpath instantiation. Berlin: Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
Beyer, J., 2010. The same or not the same: On the variety of mechanisms of path dependence. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (1), pp. 1–11.
Clemens, E. S., 2007. Toward a historicized sociology: Theorizing events, processes, and emergence. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, pp. 527–49.
Crouch, C. and Farrell, H., 2004. Breaking the path of institutional development? Alternatives to the new determinism. Rationality and Society, 16 (1), pp. 5–43.
David, P. A., 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75 (2), pp. 332–37.
Devos, G., 2003. “Land-use policy in the port of Antwerp (1870–1940)”, in R. Loyen, E. Buyst, and G. Devos (eds) Struggling for Leadership. Antwerp-Rotterdam Port Competition between 1870–2000. Heidelberg: Psychica, pp. 199–219.
Djelic, M.-L. and Quack, S., 2007. Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36 (2), pp. 161–86.
Fischer, D. H., 1970. Historians’Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New York: Harper and Row.
Hansen, B. A. and Eschelbach Hansen, M., 2007. The role of path dependence in the development of US bankruptcy law. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3 (2), pp. 203–25.
Hexter, J. H., 1961. Reappraisals in History. London: Longmans.
Hoffman, A. J., 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), pp. 351–71.
Kuilman, J. G. and van Driel, H., 2012. You too, Brutus? Category demise in Rotterdam warehousing, 1871–2011. Industrial and Corporate Change, doi:10.1093/icc/dts019.
Mackay, R. B., 2007. “What if?”: Synthesizing debates and advancing prospects of using virtual history in management and organization theory. Management and Organizational History, 2(4), pp. 295–314.
Mahoney, J., 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29 (4), pp. 507–48.
Martin, R. and Sunley, P., 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6 (4), pp. 395–437.
Munir, K. A., 2005. The social construction of events: A study of institutional change in the photographic field. Organization Studies, 26 (1), pp. 93–112.
Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94 (2), pp. 251–67.
Roelevink, E. -M. and Schenk, J., 2012. Challenging times. The renewal of a transnational relationship: The Rhenisch Westphalian coal syndicate and the coal trade association, 1918–25. Zeitschrift für Unternehmensgeschichte/Journal of Business History, 57 (2), pp. 154–180.
Sarigil, Z., 2009. Paths are what actors make of them. Critical Policy Studies, 3 (1), pp. 121–40.
Sewell, W. H., 2005. Logics of History. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., and Koch, J., 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34 (4), pp. 689–709.
Thelen, K., 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, pp. 369–404.
van den Noort, J., 2000. Een brug naar Zuid: particulier initiatief en gemeentelijke exploitatie van de Rotterdamse haven. Rotterdams Jaarboekje, 10 (8), pp. 371–95.
van Driel, H., 1994. De ontwikkeling van de vemen in Nederland 1600–1967. Management Report Series 194. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Faculteit Bedrijfskunde.
van Driel, H. and Bogenrieder, I., 2009. Memory and learning: Selecting users in the port of Rotterdam, 1883–1900. Business History, 51 (5), pp. 649–67.
van Driel, H. and de Goey, F., 2000. Rotterdam Cargo-handling Technology 1870–2000. Zutphen: Walburg Pers.
van Driel, H. and Devos, G., 2007. Path dependence in ports: The persistence of cooperative forms. Business History Review, 81 (4), pp. 681–708.
van Driel, H. and Dolfsma, W. A., 2009. Path dependence, initial conditions, and routines in organizations: The Toyota production system re-examined. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22 (1), pp. 49–72.
van Driel, H. and Schot, J., 2005. Radical innovation as a multilevel process: Introducing floating grain elevators in the port of Rotterdam. Technology and Culture, 46 (1), pp. 51–776.
Vergne, J. -P. and Durand, R., 2010. The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (4), pp. 736–59.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Hugo van Driel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Driel, H. (2013). Specifying the Role of Events in Path Dependence. In: Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. (eds) Self-Reinforcing Processes in and among Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392830_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392830_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35207-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-39283-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)