Skip to main content

Between Hope and Realism: The United States, NATO and a Transatlantic Bargain for the 21st Century

  • Chapter
NATO beyond 9/11

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 438 Accesses

Abstract

When the founders of NATO gathered in Washington in 1949, few could have anticipated that the alliance’s first invocation of its Article 5 guarantee would have been triggered by an attack on US territory. It was thus a hugely symbolic moment when, on 12 September 2001, NATO invoked Article 5 in response to the 11 September (9/11) attacks on New York and Washington, America’s allies coming to the aid of a nation experiencing a sense of shock and vulnerability perhaps only equalled by the attack on Pearl Harbor some 60 years earlier. The events of 9/11 had ramifications that reverberated far and wide, not least because of the way Washington responded to the attacks, launching two major wars in the greater Middle East whose consequences are still playing out today; Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq continue to find themselves plagued by violence, instability and an uncertain future, while the United States and many of its NATO allies are emerging from a decade of conflict economically drained and war-weary. As the introduction to this volume suggests, 9/11 was in many ways a transformative event for NATO. In particular, it brought into sharp focus America’s relationship with the alliance, magnifying existing fault lines and cleavages and casting them in a new and more urgent light.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See M. J. Williams, The Good War: NATO and the Liberal Conscience in Afghanistan (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sten Rynning, NATO in Afghanistan: The Liberal Disconnect (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012);

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. John Ikenberry, Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Philip H Gordon, ‘NATO After September 11’, Survival, Vol. 43 (4), 2001, pp. 89–106;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellen Hallams, The US and NATO Since 9/11: The Transatlantic Relationship Renewed (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tom Lansford, All for One: Terrorism, NATO and the US (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harlan Cleveland, NATO: The Transatlantic Bargain (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. In 1985 this figure stood at 6 per cent for the United States, compared to 4.5 per cent for the United Kingdom, 3.8 per cent for France, 3.0 per cent for Germany, 2.3 per cent for Italy, and 2.1 per cent for Spain. See Malcolm Chalmers, ‘The Atlantic Burden-sharing Debate–Widening or Fragmenting?’, International Affairs, Vol. 77 (3), 2001, p. 574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karl W. Deutsch, Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John A. Hall, ‘Passions within Reasons’, in Jeffrey Anderson, G. John Ikenberry and Thomas Risse (eds), The End of the West: Crisis and Chang in the Atlantic Order (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2008), p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karl-Heinz Kamp and Kurt Volker, ‘Toward a New Transatlantic Bargain’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1 February 2012, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For more on this ‘institutional logic’ argument see G. John Ikenberry, ‘Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Persistence of American Postwar Order’, International Security, Vol.23(3), Winter 1998–1999, pp. 43–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cited in

    Google Scholar 

  14. M Williams and I Neumann, ‘From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia and the Power of Identity’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 29 (2), 2000, p. 358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. See, for example, John J. Mearsheimer, ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, Vol. 19(3), 1994–1995, pp. 5–49;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, Vol. 18 (2), 1993, pp. 44–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War’, International Security, Vol.25(1), Summer 2000, pp. 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. For a detailed account of the formulation of strategy on Afghanistan, see Tim Bird and Alex Marshall, Afghanistan: How the West Lost Its Way (New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christopher Coker, ‘Between Iraq and a Hard Place: Multinational Cooperation, Afghanistan and Strategic Culture’, RUSI Journal, Vol. 151 (5), October 2006, p. 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. See, for example, Thomas Fuller, ‘France, Germany and Belgium Trigger One of the Biggest Crises in Alliance History: 3 Block NATO aid for Turks on Iraq’, International Herald Tribune, 11 February 2003;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Philip H. Gordon and Jeremy Shapiro, Allies At War: America, Europe and the Crisis Over Iraq (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Charles Kupchan, ‘The Last Days of the Atlantic Alliance’, Financial Times, 18 November 2002;

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bronwen Maddox, ‘Security Problems in Afghanistan are Taking NATO to the Brink of Failure’, The Times, 25 June 2004;

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stephen E. Meyer, ‘Carcass of Dead Policies: The Irrelevance of NATO’, Parameters, 2003–2004, pp. 83–97;

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elizabeth E. Pond, Friendly Fire: The Near-Death of the Transatlantic Alliance (Pittsburgh: European Union Studies Association, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Timo Noetzel and Benjamin Schreer, ‘Does a Multi-Tier NATO Matter? The Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change’, International Affairs, Vol. 85 (2), 2009, p. 215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallace Thies, Why NATO Endures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. James Sperling and Mark Webber, ‘NATO: From Kosovo to Kabul’, International Affairs, Vol. 85 (3), 2009, p. 503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. For a robust critique of US militarism, see Andrew J. Bacevich, The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced By War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ellen Hallams and Benjamin Schreer, ‘Towards a “Post-American” Alliance? NATO Burden-sharing After Libya’, International Affairs, Vol.88(2), 2012, pp. 313–327; p. 321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanley Sloan, Permanent Alliance? NATO and the Transatlantic Bargain from Truman to Obama (New York: Continuum Books, 2010), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bastian Giegerich, ‘NATO’s Smart Defence: Who’s Buying?’, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol.54(3), June-July 2012, pp. 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. See Sten Rynning, NATO in Afghanistan: The Liberal Disconnect (Stanford: Stanford University Press, California, 2012), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jeremy Shapiro and Nick Witney, Towards a Post-American Europe: A Power Audit of US-EU Relations (Cambridge: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2009), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Ellen Hallams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallams, E. (2013). Between Hope and Realism: The United States, NATO and a Transatlantic Bargain for the 21st Century. In: Hallams, E., Ratti, L., Zyla, B. (eds) NATO beyond 9/11. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391222_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics