Skip to main content

Abstract

Some inherent limitations of tolerance have been considered in this volume.1 Yet it has also been argued that toleration is necessary and may even be, in challenging circumstances, a desirable solution. It is unlikely that the presence of culturally diverse populations in European countries will cease to be challenging in all sorts of ways, and we are not the first to suggest that the minimalism of toleration is infinitely more attractive than many alternatives. As a result of increasing diversity, value pluralism means that we need a way of reconciling ourselves with differences we disagree with, which may be deep and difficult to bridge. Respect for the other’s individuality, reason and human standing, or the fact of common citizenship, can provide grounds for putting disagreement into perspective and thus for tolerance. In toleration, objection is balanced by acceptance, and this balancing is not just a practical necessity in the absence of better options. The attitudes it requires are virtues that pluralist societies cannot do without.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abou El Fadl, K. (2001) The Place of Tolerance in Islam. Boston Review. Available online at http://bostonreview.net/BR26.6/elfadl.html, accessed on 31 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abou El Fadl, K. (2003) Islam and the Challenge of Democracy. Boston Review. Available online at http://bostonreview.net/BR28.2/abou.html, accessed on 31 August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. and Horkheimer, M. (1986) Dialectic of Enlightenment, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003a) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003b) Islam, Secularism and the Modern State. Talal Asad Discusses His Work on Secularism and the Modern World. Asia Society. Available online at http://asiasociety.org/countries/religions-philosophies/islam- secularism-and-modern-state, accessed on 31 August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1990) ‘Modernity and Ambivalence’, Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2): 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson, E. (2009) Organisation du grand débat sur l’identité nationale. Available online at http://www.bakchich.info/IMG/pdf/debat-identite-nationale. pdf, accessed on 10 September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2004) The Golden Thread That Runs Through Our History. The Guardian. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2004/jul/08/britishidentity.economy, accessed on 12 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2006) Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire, Princeton, NJ;Woodstock: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2012) ‘Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice: A Note on the Study of Muslims in European Countries of Immigration’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, iFirst: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2011) PM’s Speech at Munich Security Conference. Available online at http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2011/02/pms-speech-at-munich-security-conference-60293, accessed on 29 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. R. (2009) ‘Redeeming the Enlightenment: New Histories of Religious Toleration’, The Journal of Modern History, 81(3): 607–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. E. (2005) Pluralism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. (2011) ‘Testing Times: Citizenship and “National Values” in Britain and Australia’, in R. Gaita (ed.), Essays on Muslims & Multiculturalism, Melbourne: Text Publishing, 119–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, F. (2010) Rückblick: Die Leitkultur-Debatte in Deutschland. Arte Journal. Available online at http://www.arte.tv/de/3026040,CmC=3026780.html, accessed on 4 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2003) Toleranz im Konflikt. Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2007) ‘“To Tolerate Means to Insult”. Toleration, Recognition and Emancipation’, in B. v. d. Brink and D. Owen (eds), Recognition and Power. Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press, 215–237.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, E. (2002) Toleration as Recognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. A. (1995) ‘Two Concepts of Liberalism’, Ethics, 105(3): 516–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2000) Two Faces of Liberalism, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, D. (2003) ‘Education to Toleration: Some Philosophical Obstacles Resolved’, in C. McKinnon and D. Castiglione (eds), The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies: Reasonable Tolerance, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. J. (2007) Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, MA;London: Belknap.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (2006) An Essay Concerning Toleration: And Other Writings on Law and Politics, 1667–1683, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1969) ‘Repressive Tolerance’, in R. P. Wolff, B. Moore and H. Marcuse (eds), A Critique of Pure Tolerance, London: Cape, 95–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maussen, M. and Bader, V. (eds) (2012) Tolerance and Cultural Diversity in Schools: Comparative Report. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, F. (2000) Einwanderung und Identität. Die Welt. Available online at http://www.welt.de/print-welt/article540438/Einwanderung_und_Identitaet.html, accessed on 11 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (1998) ‘Anti-Essentialism, Multiculturalism and the “Recognition” of Religious Minorities’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4): 378–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2007) Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. I. (1987) The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkozy, N. (2009a) Discours de M. le Président de la République, Vercors. Available online at http://www.ump55.fr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=189:discours-de-m-le-president-de-la-republique-la-chapelle- en-vercors-jeudi-12-novembre-2009&catid=43:actualite-nationale&Itemid= 90, accessed on 10 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkozy, N. (2009b) Respecter ceux qui arrivent, respecter ceux qui accueillent. Le Monde. Available online at http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2009/12/08/m-sarkozy-respecter-ceux-qui-arrivent-respecter-ceux-qui-accueillent_1277422_3232.html#ens_id=1258775, accessed on 12 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism and ‘The Politics of Recognition’: An Essay, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 25–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, B. (2001) Leitkultur als Wertekonsens. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte. Available online at http://www.bpb.de/publikationen/40QIUX,2,0,Leitkultur_als_Wertekonsens.html#art2, accessed on 12 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, A. (2006) Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 15001700, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1997) On Toleration, New Haven;London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1997) ‘Multiculturalism or the Cultural Logic of Multinational Capitalism’, New Left Review, I(225): September-October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2008) ‘Tolerance as an Ideological Category’, Critical Inquiry, 34(4): 660–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Jan Dobbernack and Tariq Modood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobbernack, J., Modood, T. (2013). Conclusion. In: Dobbernack, J., Modood, T. (eds) Tolerance, Intolerance and Respect. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390898_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics