Abstract
This chapter analyses the possible contributions of ethnography to the flourishing market for impact evaluations of culture-led regeneration policies. The growing need for accountability has multiplied university engagement in commissioned evaluations, as these seem to provide good financial support for research. These evaluations, however, have to follow a work rhythm that threatens to transform scientific research into the production of consumer goods as only certain methods can produce results fast enough for the dominant agenda. The predominance of quantitative, or at least quantifiable, data concerning evaluations of cultural policy is hence no surprise. Sticking to the requirements of classic ethnography seems therefore to exclude the participation of social anthropology in this market or - seen by the perspective this paper adopts - deprives policy-makers of valuable insights into the impacts of cultural policy on local population (the use of ethnography in policy research is also discussed in Chapter 6). The chapter will refer to a post-doctoral research project jointly funded by two UK research councils, the Arts and Humanities (AHRC) and the Economic and Social (ESRC)1 about the qualitative impacts of the European Capital of Culture (ECoC) awarded to Liverpool in 2008.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Augoyard, J.F. (1979) Pas à Pas, Essai sur le cheminement quotidien en milieu urbain. Paris: Seuil.
Banerjee, T. and Southworth, M. (eds) (1990). City Sense and City Design: Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch. Massachusetts and London: MIT Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1997a) Méditations pascaliennes. Seuil: Paris.
Bourdieu, P. (1997b) ‘Le champs économique’, in Pierre Bourdieu (ed.) Actes de la recherché en sciences socials. Economie et Economistes, Seuil, N° 119, September 1997.
Costonis, J.J. (1989) Icons and Aliens. Law, Aesthetics, and Environmental Change. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois
DCMS (2004) Culture at the Heart ofRegeneration. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Stationery Office.
de Souza Lima, A. (1998) ‘Os relatórios antropológicos de identificação de terras indigenas da Fundação do Îndio. Notas sobre o estudo da relação entre Antropologia e Indigenismo no Brasil 1968–1985’, in Joao Pacheco de Oliveira (ed.) Indigenismo et territorialização. Poderes, rotinas e saberes coloniais no Brasil contemporâneo (pp. 221–68). Contra-Capa, Rio de Janeiro.
de Souza Lima, A. and Barroso-Hoffmann, M. (eds) (2002a) Além da tutela. Bases para uma nova politica indigenista, Contra-Capa/LACED, Rio de Janeiro.
de Souza Lima, A. and Barroso-Hoffmann, M. (eds) (2002b) Estado e povos indigenas. Bases para uma nova politica indigenista, Contra-Capa/LACED, Rio de Janeiro.
de Souza Lima, A. and Barroso-Hoffmann, M. (eds) (2002c) Etnodesenvolvimento e políticas públicas. Bases para uma nova politica indigenista, Contra- Capa/LACED, Rio de Janeiro.
Durkheim, Emile (2007[1894]) Les règles de la méthode sociologique. PUF, coll. «Quadrige Grands textes»
Evans, Graeme (2005) ‘Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s contribution to Regeneration’, Urban Studies, 42(5/6): 959–83.
Florida, R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
Galbraith, J.K. (1967) The New Industrial State. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Galbraith, J.K. (1985) The Anatomy of Power. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Garcia, B., Melville R., and Cox, T. (2010) Creating an impact: Liverpool’s experience as European Capital of Culture, University of Liverpool/Liverpool JMU, 68p.
Lordon, F. (1997) ‘Le désir de “faire science”’, in Pierre Bourdieu (ed.) Actes de la recherché en sciences socials. Economie et Economistes, Seuil, N° 119, September, pp. 27–35.
Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
Murden, J. (2006) ‘“City of change and challenge”: Liverpool since 1985’, in John Belchem (ed.), Liverpool 800: Culture, Character and History (pp. 393–485). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Pacheco, J. de Oliveira (1998a) ‘Instrumentos de bordo: expectativas e possib- ilidades de trabalho do antropólogo em laudos periciais’, in Joao Pacheco de Oliveira (ed.) Indigenismo et territorialização. Poderes, rotinas e saberes coloniais no Brasil contemporâneo (pp. 269–95). Contra-Capa: Rio de Janeiro.
Pacheco, J. de Oliveira (1998b) ‘Redimensionando a questao indigena no Brasil: uma etnografia das terras indigenas’, in Joao Pacheco de Oliveira (ed.) Indigenismo et territorialização. Poderes, rotinas e saberes coloniais no Brasil contemporâneo (pp. 15–42). Contra-Capa: Rio de Janeiro.
Palmer, R. (2004) European Cities and Capitals of Culture. Brussels European Commission, Palmer Rae Associates.
Parkinson, M. (1985) Liverpool on the Brink. Berks: Policy Journals.
Skovsmose, O. (2008) ‘Mathematical Literacy and Globalisation’, in A.C. Barton et al. (eds) Internationalisation and Globalisation in Mathematics and Sciences Education (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht: Springer.
Vickery, J. (2007) The emergence of Culture-led Regeneration: A policy concept and its discontents. Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick, Research paper N° 9.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Tomke Lask
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lask, T. (2013). Liverpool Capital of Culture 2008: An Ethnographic Approach to Impact Evaluations. In: Petrie, S. (eds) Controversies in Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390836_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390836_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35138-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-39083-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)