Skip to main content
  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

If we start from ordinary usage, we can say that interpretation is concerned with meaning, and presupposes that there is something (using that term in its most comprehensive sense to include entities, statements, actions, complex situations or indeed the universe as a whole) whose meaning is not indisputably self-evident to us. There is accordingly ambiguity, making room for alternative contruals, some of which will normally be misconstruals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The Journal of George Fox (1694; London: J. M. Dent; New York: E. P. Dutton, 1924) p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heinrich Dumoulin, A History of Zen Buddhism, trans. Paul Peachey ([1959]; New York: Random House, 1963) p. 275.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shankara, Crest Jewell of Discrimination, trans. Swami Prabhvananda and Christopher Isherwood, 3rd edn (Los Angeles: Vedanta Press, 1978) p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 John Hick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hick, J. (1997). Religious Experience: Its Nature and Validity. In: Disputed Questions in Theology and the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390232_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics