Abstract
Perhaps no other poet offers such a contrast between a brief and obscure life and a vast and powerful posthumous existence as the figure of Thomas Chatterton. When he died in his Holborn garret in 1770 at the age of 17, all he could claim were a scattering of anonymous poems and letters in the newspapers, squibs, imitations, satires and love verses, and a bundle of documents rather amateurishly forged or ‘transcribed’, many purporting to be the writings of a fifteenth-century priest and poet, Thomas Rowley. In the years after Chatterton’s death, curiosity became intense about this odd conjunction of youth and age, the charity boy who had recovered the voice of a fifteenth-century priest – a language whose words were ancient yet seemed new-minted for an age tiring of politeness and wit. Chatterton fast became an object of wonder to those who, like Dr Johnson, made their way to the muniment room of St Mary Redcliffe. The young man’s writings began to take their ambiguous place in the literary canon. By 1777 Rowley’s poems had been given a scholarly edition by Thomas Tyrwhitt, and in the following year the fifteenth-century writer was awarded a chapter in Thomas Warton’s History of English Poetry.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Warton, Thomas, The History of English Poetry (London, 1774–81), ii. 139–64.
See Charles Lamb’s poem To Sara and Her Samuel’, sent to Coleridge 7 July 1796 (The Letters of Charles and Mary Anne Lamb, ed. Edwin W. Marrs, Jr. (Ithaca & London, 1975–8), i. 39), and Poole’s comparison of Coleridge and Chatterton as wayward geniuses (Poole to Henrietta Warwick, 6 February 1796: Mrs Henry Sandford, Thomas Poole and His Friends, i. 132–4). See also George Dekker, Coleridge and the Literature of Sensibility (London, 1978), 64–5.
Wordsworth, William, Poems, in Two Volumes, and Other Poems, 1800–1807, ed. Jared Curtis (Ithaca, 1983), 125.
Coleridge’s rewritten ‘Monody’ was prefixed to the 1794 Cambridge edition of the Rowley poems, edited by Lancelot Sharpe, xxv-xxviii (‘The Editor thinks himself happy in the permission of an ingenious Friend, to insert the following Monody’). An abridgement of the 1790 text (in 72 lines) was going to be printed and was set in type, only to be cancelled at the last minute and replaced by the rewritten poem. See Freeman, Arthur, and Hofmann, Theodore, ‘The Ghost of Coleridge’s First Effort: “A Monody on the Death of Chatterton”’, The Library 11 (1989), 328–35.
As Coleridge told William Worship on 22 April 1819. See The Complete Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. E. H. Coleridge (Oxford, 1975), i. 125–6.
Gordon, I. A., ‘The Case-History of Coleridge’s Monody on the Death of Chatterton’, RES 18 (1942), 49.
Life, 476. See also Goodridge, items 205 and 234, below. It was Chatterton the bluecoat boy who was set up as a monument in St Mary Redcliffe churchyard. See Russell, Charles Edward, Thomas Chatterton, The Marvellous Boy (London, 1909), 262–3.
Chatterton to Sarah Chatterton, 6 May 1770 (Works, 560). This letter, along with others of Chatterton, was well known. Besides its inclusion in Love and Madness (1770), 170–1, it was reprinted in Gregory’s Life (1789). Isaac Fell, publisher of Chatterton’s ‘Resignation’ and The Consuliad’ in the Freeholder’s Magazine, was in the same week as Chatterton’s letter arrested and imprisoned for his anti-ministerial publications. See Suarez, Michael F., SJ, ‘What Thomas Knew: Chatterton and the Business of Getting into Print’, Angelaki 1.2 (1993/4), 85–6, and his essay above.
An incomplete list of poetic references to Chatterton is given by Harvey, A. D., ‘The Cult of Chatterton amongst English Poets c. 1770-c. 1820’, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 39 (1991), 124–33. See Goodridge, below.
Yearsley, Ann, Poems on Various Subjects (London, 1787), 145–9. See Keegan, above.
In Charles Cowden Clarke’s commonplace book (Brotherton Library, Leeds University, Novello-Cowden Clarke Collection MS 6) the chorus is anthologized as ‘Ode to Freedom’ and takes its place alongside other extracts of a radical tendency. See Roe, Nicholas, John Keats and the Culture of Dissent (Oxford, 1997), 95.
Headley, Henry, Fugitive Pieces (1785), 76.
A Diary of Thomas De Quincey. 1803, ed. Horace A. Eaton (London, 1927), 156–7.
Dated c. 1775–80 by Raymond Lister, English Romantic Painting (Cambridge, 1989); see plate 23.
All quotations from the 1790 monody are transcribed from the Liber Aureus (see note 3 above). This version survives in another manuscript in Coleridge’s hand c. 1792–3, BL Add MS 47551, fos. 8V–11V (‘the Ottery Copybook’). The text given by E. H. Coleridge (Poetical Works, 1912) described as ‘First version, in Christ’s Hospital Book – 1790’ differs in 62 places from the manuscript. EHC’s changes include silent verbal adjustments such as ‘taught’ for MS ‘bade’ (1. 20), ‘th’eternal Throne’ for MS ‘the endless throne’ (81), and ‘blest’ for MS ‘vast’ (84). It is difficult to explain his tinkerings.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 David Fairer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fairer, D. (1999). Chatterton’s Poetic Afterlife, 1770–1794: A Context for Coleridge’s Monody . In: Groom, N. (eds) Thomas Chatterton and Romantic Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390225_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390225_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40581-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-39022-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)