Skip to main content
  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

The most enduring image of Romanticism is that of the poet in a tiny garret, sprawling supine on his bed: young and beautiful, an exquisite corpse. This angelic poet has suffered for his genius – starving and destitute, mad and suicidal, and now dead. The fatal archetype is, of course, Thomas Chatterton. His painting by Henry Wallis is a secular, a literary, pieta. The poet crucified by his prodigious genius, his flaming head haloed with shredded manuscripts, his lifeless feet resting against his writing-desk. But no-one is there to cradle him, only fictions ….

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. From Taylor’s dating of Rowley, the result of recording the frequency of words derived from the glossaries and dictionaries Chatterton had access to at different times, it appears that from the beginning Chatterton aimed to create a single definable author (Works, ii. 1176–228): see Groom, Nick, ‘Thomas Rowlie Preeste’, in The Early Romantics: Pope to Wordsworth, ed. Thomas Woodman (London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caine, T. Hall, Recollections of Dante Gabriel Rossetti (Boston, 1869), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Poetical Works of Thomas Chatterton, ed. Walter W. Skeat (London, 1872), ii. vii–xlvi;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dix, John, The Life of Thomas Chatterton including his Unpublished Poems and Correspondence (London, 1837).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For Dix’s duplicity and forgery, see the Chatterton entry by Penny Boumelha in Margaret M. Smith (ed.), Index of English Literary Manuscripts (London, 1986), iii. 1, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The manuscript of Meyerstein’s Life is in Bristol Reference Library, 24567. In the same year as Taylor’s incomparable edition, Grevel Lindop also edited Thomas Chatterton: Selected Poems for Carcanet (Manchester, 1972). The two bibliographies are Warren, Murray, A Descriptive and Annotated Bibliography of Thomas Chatterton (New York, 1977), and Rowles, Jean C., ‘Thomas Chatterton 1752–1770: An Annotated Bibliography’, Library Association thesis, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, Ernest, ‘New Lights on Chatterton’, Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 13 (1916), 219–51;

    Google Scholar 

  8. Powell, L. F., ‘Thomas Tyrwhitt and the Rowley Poems’, Review of English Studies 7 (1931), 314–26;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes, Richard, ‘Thomas Chatterton: The Case Re-opened’, Cornhill Magazine, 178 (1970), 200–51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holmes’s thesis, that Chatterton’s death was not an adolescent suicide but a dreadful accident, is suggested by Donald S. Taylor, ‘Chatterton’s Suicide’, Philological Quarterly 31 (1952), 63–9,

    Google Scholar 

  11. and anticipated by Neil Bell, Cover His Face: A Novel of the Life and Times of Thomas Chatterton, the Marvellous Boy of Bristol (London, 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  12. It is also, of course, the inspiration for Peter Ackroyd’s Chatterton: A Novel (London, 1987) – and the most plausible reading of the evidence.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For example, Marjorie Levinson, The Romantic Fragment Poem: A Critique of a Form (Chapel Hill, NC, 1986), 34–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Butler, Marilyn, ‘The Country Movement’, in Romanticism in National Context, ed. Roy Porter and Mikuláš Teich (Cambridge, 1988), 41–51; and ‘Against Tradition: The Case for a Particularized Historical Method’, in Historical Studies and Literary Criticism, ed. Jerome J. McGann (Madison, 1985), 25–47, esp. 37–41; Stewart, Susan, Crimes of Writing (Oxford, 1991), 148–53.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnsonian Miscellanies, ed. G. B. Hill (London, 1897), ii. 197. For a theory of counterfactuals, see Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals, ed. Mali Ferguson (London, 1997), 1–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Nick Groom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groom, N. (1999). Introduction. In: Groom, N. (eds) Thomas Chatterton and Romantic Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390225_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics