Skip to main content
  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

Both Chinese and Western scholars of IR agree that there is a large number of actors in world politics, states and international organisations (IOs) being the more important ones. Beyond that, they differ in their respective recognition of the importance of other actors. Scholars in the West place more emphasis on individuals, social and interest groups, and multi-national corporations, while Chinese scholars, at least those in the traditional school, stress the importance of such units as political parties (as a class) and national liberation movements.2

State sovereignty, the lifeblood of a state, stands above all else.

(Sha Yang)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Beijing Review, 21–27 August 1995, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Zhao Xiaochun, ‘Goujian guoji guanxi lilun tixi fangfa chutan [A probe into the methodology for forming a theoreric {sic} system in international relations]’, Journal of the Institute of International Relations, No. 2 (1 June 1994), pp. I-6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liang and Hong, Introduction to International Political Studies, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan (ed.), Facing the Challenge of the 21st Century: International Relations Studies in China, Preface, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ren Yue, ‘Sovereignty in Chinese foreign policy: principle and practice’, in Maurice Brosseau, Suzanne Pepper, and Tsang Shu-ki (eds), China Review 1996 (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1996), pp. 151–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sha Yang in Beijing Review, 21–27 August 1995, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Lemin, ‘Guoji hezuo yu zhuquan [International cooperation and sovereignty]’, Shijie zhishi [World Affairs], Beijing, No. 5 (1992), pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan Jingdong, ‘Multilateral intervention and state sovereignty: Chinese views on UN peacekeeping operations’, Political Science, Wellington, Vol. 49, No. 3 (January 1998), pp. 275–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu Xingzuo, ‘Guoji zhuquan: minzu guojia yongheng de yuanze [State sovereignty: the lasting principle of the nation-state]’, Journal of the Institute of International Relations, No. 4 (1995), pp. 57–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guo Longlong, ‘Guoji ganyu he guojia zhuquan wenti [International intervention and the problem of state sovereignty]’, International Survey, No. 6 (1994), pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, ‘State sovereignty: the lasting principle of the nation-state’, pp. 60–1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Yizhou, ‘A study of hierarchical system in international society’, Europe, No. 3 (1996), pp. 4–12 and 45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Jie, ‘China’s Spratly policy’, Asian Survey, Vol. 34, No. 10 (October 1994), p. 894.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Yizhou, Dangdai guoji zhengzhi beijingxia de guojia zhuquan wenti [State sovereignty in the contemporary international political conditions]’, Europe, No. 6 (1993), pp. 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan (ed.), Facing the Challenge of the 21st Century, Preface, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Yizhou, ‘Diyuan zhengzhi, guoji guanxi, Zhongguo shijiao [Geopolitics, international relations, China’s angle-of-view]’, Academic Journal, Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, bimonthly, No. 3 (1994), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Joseph Frankel, National Interest (London: Pall Mall, 1970), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan Xuetong, ‘Deng Xiaoping de guojia liyiguan [Deng Xiaoping’s view on national interests]’, Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], No. 7 (July 1994), pp. 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yan Xuetong, Zhongguo guojia liyi fengxi [Analysis of Chinas National Interest] (Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Press, 1996), abstract, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yan Feng, ‘Zhuquan pingdeng shi guoji guanxi de genben yuanze [Sovereignty equality is the basic principle in international relations]’, Zhendi [Encampment], Beijing, No. 3 (1992), pp. 33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao Xiaochun, ‘Nengzhanhou guojia liyi de xinbianhua [New changes in national interest after the end of the Cold War]’, Journal of the Institute of International Relations, No. 1 (1995), pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liang and Hong, Introduction to International Political Studies, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhong Yang, ‘Does ideology matter? A case study of Sino—ex-Soviet Republics relations’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 27, No. 4 (December 1994), pp. 463–77; and ‘The fallen wall and its aftermath: comparative study of foreign policy changes in emerging democracies in eastern Europe’, East European Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2 (1994), pp. 235–57.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A detailed defensive statement is contained in China Daily, 27 February 1995, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu Jianrong of Toyo Gakuin University speaking in the symposium on the ‘Japan—China—US relations in the coming era’, organised by Yomiuri Shimbun and held in Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, on 26 May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Of China’s 1.2 billion people, about 58 million are members of the CCP, which is the largest political party in the world in terms of membership. See Gerald Chan, ‘China’s vanguard confers: the 14th Communist Party Congress’, New Zealand International Review, Vol. 18, No. 2 (March/April 1993), p. 18; and China Daily, 31 December 1997, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The Constitution of the Communist Party of China (1982), in James C.F. Wang, Contemporary Chinese Politics: an Introduction, 5th edn (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1995), p. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cai Jinpei, Lu dangji guanxi sixiang yuance de xinfazhan [A discussion of new developments in the four principles of party-to-party relations]’, Dangdai shijie yu shehui zhuyi [Contemporary World & Socialism], Beijing, No. 2 (1995), p. 40. Cai is a member of the China’s Central Communist Party School; Beijing Review, 6–12 October 1997, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang’s report delivered at the 15th National Party Congress on 12 September 1997, Beijing Review, 6–12 October 1997, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cai, ‘A discussion of new developments in the four principles of partyto-party relations’, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Beijing Review, 29 December 1997 to 4 January 1998, p. 7. For a historical analysis of the PRC’s inter-party relations with other countries, see Hu Hao, Xueshi Deng Xiaoping guanyu dangji guanxi de lilun [Theory by Deng Xiaoping on inter-party relations]’, Journal of Foreign Affairs College, No. 3 (1997), pp. 33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cai, ‘A discussion of new developments in the four principles of partyto-party relations’, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Far Eastern Economic Review, 15 January 1998, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gerald Chan, China and International Organisations: Participation in Nongovernmental Organisations since 1971 (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989); ‘China and international organisations’, in Lo Chi-kin, Tsui Ka-yuen, and Suzanne Pepper (eds), China Review 1995 (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1995), chap. A7; and “‘Three Chinas” and international organisations after 1997’, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 6, No. 16 (November 1997), pp. 435–48.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China (Hong Kong: Joint Publishing (HK) Co. Ltd, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Progress in Chinas Human Rights Cause in 1996 (Beijing: Information Office, State Council, 31 March 1997), in Beijing Review, 21–27 April 1997, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Frank Ching in Far Eastern Economic Revieiw, 18 January 1996, p. 30. China Directory 1997 (Tokyo: Radiopress, 1996) lists 127 of these organisations under the title ‘mass organisations’. They are mainly friendship associations, welfare associations, foundations, and those dealing with youth, women, and union affairs. An expanded list can be found in Chinese-English Manual of Chinese Organisations (Beijing: China Today Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  38. For details, see Beijing Review, 17–23 November 1997, p. 24, and China Daily, 29 October 1997, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The Evening Post, Wellington, 31 October 1997, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou Wei, ‘The study of human rights in the People’s Republic of China’, in James T.H. Tang (ed.), Human Rights and International Relations in the Asia-Pacific Region (London and New York: Pinter, 1995), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xin Chunying in Human Rights Dialogue, New York, Vol. 3 (December 1995), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Progess in Chinas Human Rights Cause in 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Beijing Review, special issue on ‘Human rights: progress in China’, January 1996, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., 16–22 June 1997, p. 15; 21–27 April 1997, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., 16–22 December 1996, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Michael C. Davis (ed.), Human Rights and Chinese Values: Legal, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. vii and 21. See also Beijing Review, 4–10 March 1996, pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Beijing Review, 14–20 April 1997, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., 16–22 December 1996, p. 4; 16–22 June 1997, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liang Lihua, ‘Renquan waijiao [Human rights diplomacy]’, Contemporary World and Socialism, No. 1 (1995), p. 65. Professor Wang Huning of Fudan University, Shanghai, calls this kind of hegemonism ‘cultural hegemonism’. He also uses the term ‘cultural sovereignty’. See Wang Huning, ‘Cultural expansion and cultural sovereignty’, in Wang Jisi (ed.), Civilisations and International Politics, p. 342.

    Google Scholar 

  50. China Daily, 21 March 1996, p. 4. For seven consecutive years up to 1997 the United States and some European countries had presented but failed to gain enough support to pass a motion at the United Nations Commission on Human Rights to denounce China. See Beijing Review, 16–22 June 1997, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xin in Human Rights Dialogue, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Interestingly, the Party School of the CCP Central Committee has a Research Centre on Human Rights. See China Daily, 6 February 1997, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Note the use of the term ‘socialist democracy’ instead of ‘socialism’. TV news, Beijing, 10 March 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yu Wanli, ‘Guojia zhuquan yu guojia liyi de lilun yu xianshi [The theory and practice of state sovereignty and national interest]’, Studies in International Politics, No. 2 (1997), p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yan, Analysis of Chinas National Interest, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid. See also Deng Yong, ‘The Chinese conception of national interests in international relations’, The China Quarterly, No. 154 (June 1998), pp. 308–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Gerald Chan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, G. (1999). Units of Analysis: The State. In: Chinese Perspectives on International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390201_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics