Abstract
This is a book about popular fictions and pulp fantasies. At one level this is also a book which attempts to redirect a certain critical attention toward ‘trash’ art, situate it within popular culture generally and consider its aesthetic. On another level this is a book about taste and popular perception in a social as well as artistic history determined by commercialism and urbanization but lived in the sphere of the acutely personal and private. Just as with all popular arts, pulp is a moveable feast since it can be appropriated by and on behalf of the hierarchists of taste at any particular time and thus taken out of its pulp status. Pulp is both a desire for respectability and a refusal. As I argue later, its legitimacy as pulp is correlative with its illegitimacy as ‘serious’ art. Hence it is both forced into illicitness and is always illicit.1 But the delights of trash art are always contrary — at once risqué and conformist — always out of the grasp of legitimation. When you have defined them, then, like street talk, they slip away to appear elsewhere in their own secret language of seduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For the illicit pleasures of drink, smoking and drugs see John C. Burnham, Bad Habits (New York: New York University Press, 1993)
and for the illicit pleasures of public spaces see David Nasaw, Going Out: the Rise and Fall of Public Amusements (New York: Harper Collins, 1993).
Jim Miller cited in Greil Marcus, In the Fascist Bathroom: Writings on Punk 1977–1992 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993) p. 169.
Nick Hornby, Fever Pitch (London: Victor Gollancz, 1992) p. 10.
See also D.J. Taylor, A Vain Conceit: British Fiction in the 1980s (London: Bloomsbury, 1989) p. 21: Why read fiction? At heart I suppose — this applies whether the author is Proust or Catherine Cookson, and knocks away most of the arguments advanced in this book — you read fiction to escape, to bring into your own life the rewarding tensions that would otherwise be absent from it. Books, it scarcely needs saying, are life lived at one remove. I feel about novels the way I felt at twelve about association football, the way I felt at eighteen about rock and roll. At bottom the critic is nothing more than a fan — or a performer manqué.
Jonathan Mantle, In for a Penny: The Unauthorised Biography of Jeffrey Archer (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1979) p. 133.
See George Orwell, ‘Raffles and Miss Blandish’, in Decline of the English Murder and other Essays (Harmondsworth: Penguin [1946], 1979).
Jeff Koons, The Jeff Koons Handbook (London: Thames & Hudson, 1992) pp. 50 and 54.
A.P. Ryan, Lord Northcliffe (London: Collins, 1953) p. 42 onwards.
Peter Haining, ed., The Fantastic Pulps (London: Victor Gollancz, 1975) pp. 189–90.
J. Pacione, A History of the Booker Prize, unpublished M. Phil (Stirling, 1991) pp. 3–4.
Maurice Flanagan, Paperbacks, Pulp and Comic Collector (Vol. 1. 1994) p. 48.
Geoffrey O’Brien, Hardboiled America: the Lurid Years of Paperbacks (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1981) pp. 12–13.
Lee Server, Danger is My Business (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1993) p. 15.
Noelle Watson and Paul Shellinger, eds, Twentieth Century Science Fiction Writers (Chicago: St James Press, 1991) p. 299.
Patrick Parrinder, ‘Scientists in Science Fiction: Enlightenment and After’, in Rhys Garnett and R.J. Ellis, eds, Science Fiction: Roots and Branches: Contemporary Critical Approaches (London: Macmillan, 1990) p. 57.
Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966) p. 46.
John McHale quoted in Gillo Dorfles, Kitsch: an Anthology of Bad Taste (London: Studio Vista, 1969) pp. 98 and 108.
J.A. Sutherland, Fiction and the Fiction Industry (London: Athlone Press, 1978) p. 65.
John St John, William Heinemann: a Century of Publishing, 1890–1990 (London: Heinemann, 1990) p. 20.
Matthew Arnold in Ray Ginger, ed., The Nationalizing of American Life 1877–1900 (New York: Free Press, 1965) p. 123.
S.J. Taylor, Shock! Horror!: The Tabloids in Action (London: Corgi, 1991) p. 240.
Copyright information
© 1996 Clive Bloom
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bloom, C. (1996). Throwing Rice at Brad and Janet: Illicit, Delinquent Pleasures. In: Cult Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390126_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390126_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62302-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-39012-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)