Skip to main content

Throwing Rice at Brad and Janet: Illicit, Delinquent Pleasures

  • Chapter
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

This is a book about popular fictions and pulp fantasies. At one level this is also a book which attempts to redirect a certain critical attention toward ‘trash’ art, situate it within popular culture generally and consider its aesthetic. On another level this is a book about taste and popular perception in a social as well as artistic history determined by commercialism and urbanization but lived in the sphere of the acutely personal and private. Just as with all popular arts, pulp is a moveable feast since it can be appropriated by and on behalf of the hierarchists of taste at any particular time and thus taken out of its pulp status. Pulp is both a desire for respectability and a refusal. As I argue later, its legitimacy as pulp is correlative with its illegitimacy as ‘serious’ art. Hence it is both forced into illicitness and is always illicit.1 But the delights of trash art are always contrary — at once risqué and conformist — always out of the grasp of legitimation. When you have defined them, then, like street talk, they slip away to appear elsewhere in their own secret language of seduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For the illicit pleasures of drink, smoking and drugs see John C. Burnham, Bad Habits (New York: New York University Press, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. and for the illicit pleasures of public spaces see David Nasaw, Going Out: the Rise and Fall of Public Amusements (New York: Harper Collins, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jim Miller cited in Greil Marcus, In the Fascist Bathroom: Writings on Punk 1977–1992 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993) p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nick Hornby, Fever Pitch (London: Victor Gollancz, 1992) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also D.J. Taylor, A Vain Conceit: British Fiction in the 1980s (London: Bloomsbury, 1989) p. 21: Why read fiction? At heart I suppose — this applies whether the author is Proust or Catherine Cookson, and knocks away most of the arguments advanced in this book — you read fiction to escape, to bring into your own life the rewarding tensions that would otherwise be absent from it. Books, it scarcely needs saying, are life lived at one remove. I feel about novels the way I felt at twelve about association football, the way I felt at eighteen about rock and roll. At bottom the critic is nothing more than a fan — or a performer manqué.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonathan Mantle, In for a Penny: The Unauthorised Biography of Jeffrey Archer (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1979) p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See George Orwell, ‘Raffles and Miss Blandish’, in Decline of the English Murder and other Essays (Harmondsworth: Penguin [1946], 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeff Koons, The Jeff Koons Handbook (London: Thames & Hudson, 1992) pp. 50 and 54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.P. Ryan, Lord Northcliffe (London: Collins, 1953) p. 42 onwards.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Haining, ed., The Fantastic Pulps (London: Victor Gollancz, 1975) pp. 189–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Pacione, A History of the Booker Prize, unpublished M. Phil (Stirling, 1991) pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maurice Flanagan, Paperbacks, Pulp and Comic Collector (Vol. 1. 1994) p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geoffrey O’Brien, Hardboiled America: the Lurid Years of Paperbacks (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1981) pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee Server, Danger is My Business (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1993) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noelle Watson and Paul Shellinger, eds, Twentieth Century Science Fiction Writers (Chicago: St James Press, 1991) p. 299.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patrick Parrinder, ‘Scientists in Science Fiction: Enlightenment and After’, in Rhys Garnett and R.J. Ellis, eds, Science Fiction: Roots and Branches: Contemporary Critical Approaches (London: Macmillan, 1990) p. 57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966) p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  18. John McHale quoted in Gillo Dorfles, Kitsch: an Anthology of Bad Taste (London: Studio Vista, 1969) pp. 98 and 108.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.A. Sutherland, Fiction and the Fiction Industry (London: Athlone Press, 1978) p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  20. John St John, William Heinemann: a Century of Publishing, 1890–1990 (London: Heinemann, 1990) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matthew Arnold in Ray Ginger, ed., The Nationalizing of American Life 1877–1900 (New York: Free Press, 1965) p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.J. Taylor, Shock! Horror!: The Tabloids in Action (London: Corgi, 1991) p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Clive Bloom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bloom, C. (1996). Throwing Rice at Brad and Janet: Illicit, Delinquent Pleasures. In: Cult Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390126_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics