Abstract
That Caliban is physically repulsive is a given of the play. Everyone who comes into contact with him is repelled by his bodily form and shape. Even Ariel, who is stranger, or more inhuman, than Caliban in his ability to fly and hide and change his shape, and is regarded as quaint and delicate, takes it on himself to side with Prospero in oppressing the ‘monster’ when he and it share a similar fate under the magician’s heavy hand. Most complex, perhaps, of all, is Miranda’s sense of revulsion against Caliban. Having no memory of men or sense of social behaviour other than those learned from contact with her austere and tyrannical father, it is not clear where her feelings of antipathy for Caliban stem from. Whether he attempted to rape or seduce her — ‘violate / The honour of my child’ (I, 2, 349–50) — is not reliably reported; our source for this tale is that most biased of all sexual narrators, the young woman’s own father. She can recall a pristine time when she coddled and nurtured him, taught him to speak English.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hayden White, ‘The Forms of Wildness: Archaeology of an Idea’, The Wild Man Within: An Image in Western Thought from the Renaissance to Romanticism, edited by Edward Dudley and Maximillian E. Novak (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1972), p. 15.
Richard Bernheimer, Wild Men in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Harvard University Press: 1952), p. 2.
Stephen Greenblatt, ‘Invisible bullets: Renaissance authority and its subversion, Henry IV and Henry V’, Political Shakespeare: new essays in cultural materialism, edited by Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), pp. 18–47.
Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History (New York: Vintage Books, 1959), p. 191.
Ibid.
Karen Newman, ‘“And wash the Ethiop white’: femininity and the monstrous in Othello’, p. 148 and elsewhere.
Ibid.
On the basis of this speech, Stephen Orgel nominates Caliban ‘the other great poet of the play’. He notes that while ‘we see little enough of this side of Caliban, Prospero’s fear and loathing render him utterly blind to it’. See ‘Shakespeare and the Cannibals’, Cannibals Witches, and Divorce: Estranging the Renaissance, Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1985; New Series, no. 11. Edited by Marjorie Garber (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), p. 57.
Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World, translated by Helen Iswolsky (Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1968), pp. 303–67.
Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, translated by Charles Lam Markmann (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1967), especially Chapter Five, ‘The Fact of Blackness’, pp. 109–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Derek Cohen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, D. (1993). Caliban’s Body. In: The Politics of Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390010_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390010_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39161-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-39001-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)