Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Library of Philosophy and Religion ((LPR))

  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

We have seen that there are no insuperable difficulties about picking out some disembodied spirit as being one and the same individual as some identifiable human being now deceased. Problems of post-mortem identification do not constitute a fatal, or even a very serious, objection to the belief in a life after death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See J. A. Shaffer, ‘Could mental states be brain processes?’, in C. V. Borst (ed.), The Mind—Brain Identity Theory (London: Macmillan, 1970) pp. 113–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. See Kai Nielsen, ‘The Faces of Immortality’, in Stephen T. Davis (ed.), Death and Afterlife (London: Macmillan, 1989) pp. 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Penelhum, Survival and Disembodied Existence (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970) p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See W. Penfield, The Mystery of the Mind (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975) pp. 21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Eccles, The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953) p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Grey Walter, The Living Brain (London: Duckworth, 1953) p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Berger, Psyche (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1940). Although a fully paid-up physicalist, he confusingly called this form of physical energy ‘psychic energy’.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. A. C. Dobbs, ‘Time and ESP’, Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, Vol.54, pt. 197, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. M. Armstrong, A Materialist Theory of Mind (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968) p. 364.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See K R. Lashley, ‘The Search for the Engram’, esp. pp. 501–3, in F. A. Beach and D. O. Hebb, The Neurophysiology of Lashley, cited in H. A. Bursen, Dismantling the Memory Machine (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1978) pp. 15–16.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Henri Bergson, ‘The Soul and the Body’, in Mind-Energy (London: Macmillan, 1935) p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 R. W. K. Paterson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paterson, R.K.W. (1995). The Mental and the Physical. In: Philosophy and the Belief in a Life After Death. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389885_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics