Skip to main content

Clinton and the Courts

  • Chapter
The Clinton Presidency

Part of the book series: Southampton Studies in International Policy ((SSIP))

  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

President Ronald Reagan was committed to fundamental change in the direction of constitutional decision-making in the federal courts, especially in most civil liberties fields. Toward that end, the Reagan Justice Department pursued an aggressive judicial agenda directed at persuading the courts to reject or limit abortion precedents and constitutional requirements of church-state separation, as well as earlier decisions expanding the rights of suspects and defendants in criminal cases and rulings condoning affirmative action programs. Even the office of Solicitor-General, an official appointed by the president but traditionally removed from politics, was put to the administration’s purposes, to such an extent, in fact, that Rex Lee, Reagan’s first Solicitor-General, resigned from the office in protest. The Reagan White House also took steps to assure the appointment of federal judges who shared the president’s conservative constitutional philosophy. President Bush continued the pattern, although in a more moderate fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • This summary is largely based on ‘Reaganizing the Judiciary: The First Term Appointments’, Judicature, Vol. 68, April-May 1985, pp. 313–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • This summary is based largely on Sheldon Goldman, ‘The Bush Imprint on the Judiciary: Carrying on a Tradition’, Judicature, 74, April-May 1991, pp. 294–306, and National Law Journal, August 6 1990, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • This discussion is based largely on Sheldon Goldman, ‘Judicial Selection under Clinton: A Midterm Examination’, Judicature, 78, May-June 1995, pp. 276–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • The percentage for other presidents was Bush, 58.9 per cent; Reagan, 55.2 per cent; Carter, 50.9 per cent; Nixon, 48.4 per cent; Johnson, 55.3 per cent; Kennedy, 62.2 per cent; and Eisenhower, 61.7 per cent.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, for example, the comments in John Nichols, ‘The Clinton Courts: Liberals Need Not Apply’, Progressive, Vol. 60, September 1996, pp. 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronald Stidham et al., ‘The Voting Behavior of President Clinton’s Judicial Appointees’, Judicature, Vol. 80, July-August 1996, pp. 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yarbrough, T.E. (1999). Clinton and the Courts. In: Herrnson, P.S., Hill, D.M. (eds) The Clinton Presidency. Southampton Studies in International Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389854_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics