Abstract
President Ronald Reagan was committed to fundamental change in the direction of constitutional decision-making in the federal courts, especially in most civil liberties fields. Toward that end, the Reagan Justice Department pursued an aggressive judicial agenda directed at persuading the courts to reject or limit abortion precedents and constitutional requirements of church-state separation, as well as earlier decisions expanding the rights of suspects and defendants in criminal cases and rulings condoning affirmative action programs. Even the office of Solicitor-General, an official appointed by the president but traditionally removed from politics, was put to the administration’s purposes, to such an extent, in fact, that Rex Lee, Reagan’s first Solicitor-General, resigned from the office in protest. The Reagan White House also took steps to assure the appointment of federal judges who shared the president’s conservative constitutional philosophy. President Bush continued the pattern, although in a more moderate fashion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
This summary is largely based on ‘Reaganizing the Judiciary: The First Term Appointments’, Judicature, Vol. 68, April-May 1985, pp. 313–29.
This summary is based largely on Sheldon Goldman, ‘The Bush Imprint on the Judiciary: Carrying on a Tradition’, Judicature, 74, April-May 1991, pp. 294–306, and National Law Journal, August 6 1990, p. 43.
This discussion is based largely on Sheldon Goldman, ‘Judicial Selection under Clinton: A Midterm Examination’, Judicature, 78, May-June 1995, pp. 276–91.
The percentage for other presidents was Bush, 58.9 per cent; Reagan, 55.2 per cent; Carter, 50.9 per cent; Nixon, 48.4 per cent; Johnson, 55.3 per cent; Kennedy, 62.2 per cent; and Eisenhower, 61.7 per cent.
See, for example, the comments in John Nichols, ‘The Clinton Courts: Liberals Need Not Apply’, Progressive, Vol. 60, September 1996, pp. 25–28.
Ronald Stidham et al., ‘The Voting Behavior of President Clinton’s Judicial Appointees’, Judicature, Vol. 80, July-August 1996, pp. 16–20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yarbrough, T.E. (1999). Clinton and the Courts. In: Herrnson, P.S., Hill, D.M. (eds) The Clinton Presidency. Southampton Studies in International Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389854_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389854_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40438-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-38985-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)