Skip to main content

Measures for Geographical Concentration and Specialization with Administrative-area Data

  • Chapter
Economic Integration and the Location of Industries

Part of the book series: IDE-JETRO Series ((IDE))

  • 256 Accesses

Abstract

Measures introduced here have been developed to understand tendencies in the distribution of economic activity. The merits of these measures are in the convenience of data collection and processing; the data used for constructing these measures is administrative- area data rather firm- level data, although the measures for firm-level data developed recently. In this chapter, the property of these measures, and the merits and limitations of using them, are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiginger, Karl. 1999. “Do Industrial Structures Converge? A Survey on the Empirical Literature on Specialization and Concentration of Industries,” WIFO Working Papers, No. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Paul D. 1978. “Measures of Inequality,” American Sociological Review, 43 (6), pp. 865–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. 1970. “On the Measurement of Inequality,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2, pp. 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedictis, Luca D. and Massimo Tamberi. 2004. “Overall Specialization Empirics: Techniques and Application,” Open Economies Reviews, 15, pp. 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combes, Pierre-P. and Overman Henry G. 2004. “The Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities in the European Union,” in J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4, Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V., pp. 2845–2910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, Frank A. 1980. “On the Structure of Additive Inequality Measures,” The Review of Economic Studies, 47 (3), pp. 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, Frank A. 2011. Measuring Inequality, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrini, Eleonora. 2009. “Using Entropy Measures to Disentangle Regional from National Localization Patterns,” Regional Science and Urban Economic, 39 (2), pp. 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encaoua, David and Alexis Jacquemin. 1980. “Degree of Monopoly, Indices of Concentration and Threat of Entry,” International Economic Review, 21 (1), pp. 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. “The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools,” in Adam B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (eds) Patents, Citations, and Innovations, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 403–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Vernon J., Ari Kuncoro and Matthew Turner. 1995. “Industrial Development in Cities,” The Journal of Political Economy, 103 (5), pp. 1067–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herfindahl, Orris C. 1959. Copper Costs and Prices: 1870–1957, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1945. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, Jr. Edgar M. 1936. “The Measurement of Industrial Localization,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18 (4), pp. 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Walter. 1960. Method of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science, Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger-Boden, Christiane, Edgar Morgenroth, and George Petrakos. 2008. The Impact of European Integration on Regional Structural Change and Cohesion, London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midelfart-Knarvik, K. H., H. G. Overman, S. J. Redding and A. J. Venables. 2002. “Integration and Industrial Specialization in the European Union”, Revue Économique, 53 (3): 469–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshow, Stan. 1984. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, Norwich: Geo Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, Claude E. 1948. “The Mathematical Theory of Communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(July & October), pp. 379–423 and 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, Henri. 1967. Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 IDE-JETRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gokan, T. (2012). Measures for Geographical Concentration and Specialization with Administrative-area Data. In: Kuroiwa, I. (eds) Economic Integration and the Location of Industries. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389427_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics