Skip to main content

Psychological Approaches to Culture

  • Chapter
Male Myths and Icons
  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

I have devoted a whole chapter to psychological approaches to culture, since it is the approach which interests me most, and because in the last twenty years the use of psychoanalytic ideas, and to some extent ideas from Jungian psychology, has increased enormously in literary criticism, film criticism and cultural studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

4 Psychological Approaches to Culture

  • 1. Lionel Trilling, ‘Freud and Literature’, in David Lodge (ed.), 20th Century Literary Criticism: A Reader (London: Longman, 1972) p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest Jones, Hamlet and Oedipus (New York: W. W. Norton, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection (London: TavistockiRoutledge, 1989) p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • 9. See, for example, D. T. Suzuki, The Zen Doctrine of No Mind (London: Rider, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • See, for example, D. T. Suzuki, The Zen Doctrine of No Mind (London: Rider, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11. See Elizabeth Grosz, Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction (London and New York: Routledge, 1990) p. I 16–26; also Lynne Segal, Straight Sex, pp. 130-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • 12. Constance Penley, ‘Introduction: The Lady Doesn’t Vanish: Feminism and Film Theory’, in C. Penley (ed.), Feminism and Film Theory (New York: Routledge, 1988) pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Freud, An Outline of Psycho-analysis (London: The Hogarth Press, 1973) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • 14. Karen Horney, ‘The Dread of Woman’, in Feminine Psychology (New York: W. W. Norton, 1973) p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbara Creed, The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism and Psychoanalysis (London and New York: Routledge, 1993) pp. 24ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • 18. Amy Taubin, ‘Invading Bodies: Alien3 and the Trilogy’, Sight and Sound 2:3 (July 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20. Ibid., p. 165; see also Barbara Creed, ‘Phallic panic: male hysteria and Dead Ringers’, Screen 31:2 (1990) pp. 125–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • 21. Edward F. Edinger, Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983) Chapter 2, ‘The Alienated Ego’.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the Trickster, see Joseph Henderson, ‘Ancients Myths and Modern Man’, in Man and his Symbols, pp. 103 ff. For a political analysis of the Bond stories, see T. Bennett and T. Woollacott, Bond and Beyond: the Political Career of a Popular Hero (London: Macmillan, 1988); for a structuralist analysis, see Umberto Eco, ‘The Narrative Structure in Fleming’, in B. Waites, T. Bennett and G. Martin (eds), Popular Culture, pp. 242–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • 24. Marie Louise von Franz, Interpretation of Fairy Tales (Dallas: Spring Publications, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25. See Greil Marcus, Dead Elvis: A Chronicle of a Cultural Obsession (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • See the discussion in Jackie Byars, All That Hollywood Allows: Re-reading Gender in 1950s Melodrama (London: Routledge, 1991) Chapter 4; Janet Thumim, Celluloid Sisters, Chapter 6; Constance Penley, Feminism and Film Theory; and E. Ann Kaplan, Psychoanalysis and Cinema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laura Mulvey, ‘Afterthoughts on “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” inspired by Duel in the Sun’, in C. Penley, Feminism and Film Theory, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald Spoto, The Life of Alfred Hitchcock: The Dark Side of Genius (London: Collins, 1983) p. 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • 34. William Schoell, Don’t Go Into the Shower: The Shocker Film Phenomenon (London: Robinson Publishing, 1988) p. 55; Carol Clover, Men, Women and Chainsaws, pp. 23 and 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • 36. See Warren Farrell, The Myth of Male Power: Why Men are the Disposable Sex (London: Fourth Estate, 1994) pp. 243–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • 38. Jean Domarchi, ‘Knife in the Wound’, in Jim Hillier (ed.), Cahiers du Cinema: Volume I, The 1950s: Neo-Realism, Hollywood, New Wave (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985) p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois Truffaut, Hitchcock (London: Panther, 1969) p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  • 46. See Michael A. Messner, ‘Masculinities and Athletic Careers’, in J. Lorber and S. A. Farrell (eds), The Social Construction of Gender (Newbury Park:Sage, 1991) pp. 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jo Campling

Copyright information

© 1995 Roger Horrocks

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horrocks, R. (1995). Psychological Approaches to Culture. In: Campling, J. (eds) Male Myths and Icons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389397_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics