Advertisement

Sri Lanka: Exploring ‘Ownership’ of Aid-Funded Projects: a Comparative Study of Japanese, Norwegian and Swedish Project Aid

  • Alf Morten Jerve
  • W. D. Lakshman
  • Piyadasa Ratnayake

Abstract

A project approach to the study of ownership in aid relationships The current debate and hence much of the literature on aid effectiveness tend to take a country perspective (OECD/DAC 1996; WB 1998; Tarp et al. 2000; Easterly 2003; WB 2003). The same goes for discussions of ownership and partnership in the relationship between recipients and donors. When countries are made the unit of analysis and the focus of discourse, however, it leads to great simplification of a complex institutional landscape. Countries do not own policies or exercise ownership in developmental processes — their institutions do. Some institutions in a country will exercise strong ownership in its cooperation with donors, while others are puppets on donors’ strings. An effective aid partnership is said to rest on mutual understanding and mutual responsibility, combined with strong recipient ownership of policy making and implementation processes. While this is not too difficult to express in overall political agreements at government level, the situation at the level of operations is different.

Keywords

Donor Agency World Bank Research Cooperation Recipient Organisation Dental Faculty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amarasinghe, D.P. (1998). Is a Process Approach to Integrated Rural Development Sustainable?; A Case Study of Moneragala District, Sri Lanka. Massachusetts: Clarke University.Google Scholar
  2. Baklien, Bergljot (2003). ‘MONDEP: The phasing out process in Moneragala’. Colombo: University of Colombo (MONDEP Formative Process Research Project, Working paper no. 12).Google Scholar
  3. Bond, R. (1997). ‘Operationalising Process: The Experience of the First Decade of the Mon.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Easterly, William (2003). ‘Can foreign aid buy growth?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 17(3), pp. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernando, Laksiri (2003). Issues of Social Harmony and Local Governance in the Moneragala District: Implications for Development. Colombo: University of Colombo, (MONDEP Formative Process Research Project, Working paper no. 8).Google Scholar
  7. Jerve, A.M., W. Gooneratne and J.E. Moore (1992). Evaluation of Hambantota Integraated Rural Development Programme (HIRDEP). Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Jerve, A.M., S. Endresen, D. Gamage and M.M. Karunanayake (2003). Sustaining Local Level Development: What Worked and What Did Not. Lessons from Phasing-out of the Norwegian aid to the Hambantota Integrated Rural Development Programme (HIRDEP), Sri Lanka 1992 to 1999. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (Report R 2003:2).Google Scholar
  9. JICA (2002). Final Evaluation Report.Google Scholar
  10. Korten, D.C. (1980). ‘Community organisation and rural development: A learning process approach’. Public Administration Review, Sept./Oct.Google Scholar
  11. Moore, M., Y. Rasanayagam and K.W. Tilakaratne (1995). ‘Moneragala Integrated Rural Development Programme Mid-Term Review’. Report to Norad and Ministry of Finance, Planning, Ethnic Affairs & National Integration, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  12. OECD/DAC (1996). Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Co-operation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. Ostrom, E. et al. (2001). Aid, Incentives and Sustainability. Stockholm: Sida (Sida Studies in Evaluation 02/01).Google Scholar
  14. Sanderatne, Nimal and Jan S. Nilsson (1996). Sri Lankan — Swedish Research Cooperation. Stockholm: SAREC (Sida Evaluation 96/39).Google Scholar
  15. Sida (2004). Forging Links. Research Cooperation 2003. Stockholm: SAREC.Google Scholar
  16. Sri Lanka Regional Development Division (1995). IRDP ‘Programme — 15 years of experience in Sri Lanka’. Colombo: Government of Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  17. Tarp, Finn ed. (2000). Foreign Aid and Development — Lessons Learnt and Directions for the Future. New York/London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  18. World Bank (WB) (1998). Assessing Aid. What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. World Bank (WB) (2003). Toward Country-led Development. A Multi Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework. Washington, DC: Operations Evaluation Department.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alf Morten Jerve, W. D. Lakshman and Piyadasa Ratnayake 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alf Morten Jerve
  • W. D. Lakshman
    • 1
  • Piyadasa Ratnayake
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ColomboSri Lanka
  2. 2.Saga UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations