Abstract
Vietnam, although a one-party state, has become a favourite aid recipient for many multilateral and bilateral donors, making Vietnam today the world’s third largest aid recipient, after Iraq and Afghanistan, and the World Bank’s second largest borrower. Aside from its good performance in poverty reduction and economic growth, Vietnam is popular because it is perceived as an ‘effective’ user of aid. In fact, Vietnam is often identified as a ‘best practice’ example of government ownership of the development agenda and aid management (GRIPS 2002; UNDP 1996, WB 2002). Vietnam has been selected a pilot recipient country to implement the Paris Declaration on Aid Harmonisation and Effectiveness, and a survey among donors claims that 65% of donors are aligning their aid to the government’s strategies (Jacquemin and Bainbridge 2005, p.4). The UN Resident Coordinator in Vietnam, John Hendra, recently categorised Vietnam as ‘the world leader in aid effectiveness’ (Vietnam News on 29 December 2006).
Le Thanh Forsberg is writing her doctoral thesis. This paper is a part of her thesis and the results it reports are drawn mainly from almost 100 interviews conducted between 2001 and 2005. While the author retains a full list of specific interviews, the interviewees are not identified individually because of requests for anonymity. My sincere thanks are given to all of the interviewees. None, however, is responsible for any remaining errors. The interpretations in this paper remain my own. Please see the end notes for further details on the categories of interviews.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Central Party Committee (2001). The Politburo Resolution on International Economic Integration, No.7 — NQ/TW dated on 27 November 2001, The Communist Party of Vietnam.
Dapice (2002) ‘Vietnam’s growth and foreign aid: an ideal recipient?’, mimeo, Tuffs University Dept of Economics, and Vietnam Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University: Author.
Forsberg, L.T (2007). ‘Defining Strong Ownership: Institutional Determinants and Stakeholder Interests in Vietnamese Development Planning’, doctoral dissertation Lund Studies in Economic History, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Forsberg, L. T. & Kokko, A. (forthcoming). From Growth to Poverty Reduction: The Framework for Development Cooperation in Vietnam, Vietnam Country Report, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida).
GTZ & CIEM (2004). Decentralization: National Policies and Field Experiences on Decentralization of Planning and Budgeting, National Workshop, 16–17, November 2004, Hanoi, workshop papers joint published by GTZ & CIEM, 89 pp.
GRIPS (2002). Japan’s Development Cooperation in Vietnam — Supporting Broad-based Growth with Poverty Reduction. Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
Jacquemin and Bainbridge (2005). ‘Perceptions of development partners and evidence on aid effectiveness — Vietnam Case Study’, Report to DFID, October 2005.
‘Joint Donor Comments on the Draft of the ODA Strategic Framework sent to Vice Minister, Cao Viet Sinh’ Ministry of Planning and Investment on 30 November 2005.
MPI (2004). Legalization of Decentralization in the Management of ODA (in Vietnamese), Department of Legislation, November 2004.
MPI (2001). Interim Growth and Poverty Reduction Paper (I-PRSP), ODA Newsletter, No. 6, 15/6/2001, Vietnam.
Nguyen, T.N.M (2006). ‘Directions of key donors 2006 — 2010 & beyond’, Power Point Presentation at DFID Seminar on 15 April 2006, Hanoi: Author.
Pike, D. (1987). Vietnam and the Soviet Union. USA: Westview Press.
Riksdag & Departement (RoD) (2003). ‘Sverige ställer krav på favoriten: Svensk biståndspolitik skärper tonen mot Vietnam’ [Sweden puts pressure [RM13]on the favourite: Swedish aid politics hardens demands on Vietnam], Politisk Journal från Riksdag, Regering och EU, No.40 (article by Orrenius A.), Stockholm.
Soeya, Y. (1996). ‘Vietnam in Japan’s regional policy’ in Morley, J. & Nishihara, M. (eds), Vietnam Joins the World, Armonk, NY: M.E, Sharpe.
The Library of Congress Country Studies 1987, ‘Vietnam Foreign Economic Assistance’, accessed at: http://www.photius.com/countries/vietnam/society/vietnam_society_foreign_economic_ass11835.html on 19/7/2005
UNDP (2005). Vietnam Development Cooperation Report 2004, Hanoi.
UNDP (1996). Developing Capacities in Aid Co-ordination and Management: Vietnam — a Successful Government — UNDP partnership, Management Development and Governance Division, UNDP.
World Bank (WB) (2002). Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy — Takes New Approach to PRSP Effort, News on Vietnam’s poverty reduction, www.vdic.org.vn accessed on 10/12/2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Le Thanh Forsberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forsberg, L.T. (2008). Vietnam: the Making of Recipient Ownership and Responses to Swedish and Japanese Aid. In: Jerve, A.M., Shimomura, Y., Hansen, A.S. (eds) Aid Relationships in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389175_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389175_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28177-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-38917-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)