Skip to main content
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

The Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) was brought into being by the Bangkok Declaration, signed in August 1967. ASEAN originally consisted of Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines and Thailand, and expanded its membership to include Brunei in 1984 and Vietnam in 1995. One of the most successful regional organizations among industrializing countries, ASEAN rose to the challenges of the Cold War and the Cambodian crisis, and has been adapting itself to the recent developments in the Asia-Pacific political economy. How, then, has ASEAN fitted into the regime dynamics of the Asia-Pacific region? What role have the ASEAN states played in the process of regime formation?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Richard Higgott, ‘Competing Theoretical Approaches to International Cooperation: Implications for the Asia-Pacific’, in Richard Higgott, Richard Leaver and John Ravenhill (eds), Pacific Economic Relations in the 1990s: Cooperation or Conflict (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993), pp. 299, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thanat Khoman, The Pacific Basin Co-operation Concept’, in Sir John Crawford and Greg Seow (eds), Pacific Economic Co-operation: Suggestions for Action (Selangor, Malaysia: Heinemann 1981), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thanat Khoman, ‘ASEAN in a Regional and Global Context’, in Karl D. Jackson et al. (eds), ASEAN in Regional and Global Context (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koji Watanabe, ‘Japan and Southeast Asia: 1980’, Asia-Pacific Community, Spring 1980, pp. 89–90;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sueo Sudo, ‘Nanshin, Superdomino, and the Fukuda Doctrine: Stages in Japan-Southeast Asian Relations’, Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, vol. 5, no. 3 (Fall 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Makoto Ikema, ‘Japan’s Economic Relations with ASEAN’, in Ross Garnaut (ed.), ASEAN in a Changing Pacific and World Economy (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1980), pp. 473–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donald Crone, The ASEAN States: Coping with Dependence (New York: Praeger, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albert Widjaja, ‘Toward a Pacific Basin Community in the 80s: An Indonesian Perspective’, in The Pacific Community Concept: Views from Eight Nations (Tokyo: Center for International Exchange, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Bifan, ‘Jingji hezuo de gouxiang, huodong yu qianjing’ (The Concept, Activity, and Prospects of Economic Cooperation), in Han Zhengshe and Gao Lianfu et al. (eds), Yatai diqu de juegi (The Rise of Asia-Pacific) (Chongqing: Chongqing chubanshe, 1989), pp. 324–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawrence Woods, Asia-Pacific Diplomacy: Nongovernmental Organizations and International Relations (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1993), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumao Kaneko, ‘A New Pacific Initiative: Strengthening the PECC Process’, Japan Review of International Affairs (Spring/Summer, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Michael Leifer, ASEAN and the Security of South-East Asia (London: Routledge, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muthiah Alagappa, ‘Regionalism and the Quest for Security: ASEAN and the Cambodian Conflict’, Journal of International Affairs, vol. 46, no. 2 (Winter 1993), pp. 439–67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hadi Soesastro, ‘Institutional Aspects of Pacific Economic Cooperation’, in Hadi Soesastro and Han Sung-joo (eds), Pacific Economic Cooperation: The Next Phase (Jakarta: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Donald Crone, ‘Does Hegemony Matter? The Reorganization of the Pacific Political Economy’, World Politics, vol. 45 (1993), pp. 501–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee Tsao Yuan, ‘The ASEAN Free Trade Area: The Search for a Common Prosperity’, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, vol. 8 (1994), pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chia Siow Yue and Lee Tsao Yuan, ‘Subregional Economic Zones in Southeast Asia’, in C. Fred Bergsten and Marcus Noland (eds), Pacific Dynamism and the International Economic System (Washington, DC: Institute for Interantional Economics, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mark Turner, ‘Subregional Economic Zones, Politics and Development: the Philippine Involvement in the East ASEAN Growth Area,’ Pacific Review, vol. 8, no. 4 (1995), pp. 637–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. For a critical analysis of this, see John Ravenhill, ‘Economic Cooperation in Southeast Asia: Changing Incentives’, Asian Survey, vol. 35, no. 9 (September 1995), pp. 850–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chin Kin Wah, ‘ASEAN: Consolidation and Institutional Change’, Pacific Review, vol. 8, no. 3 (1995), pp. 424–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Narongchai Akrasanee and David Stifel, ‘The Political Economy of the ASEAN Free Trade Area’, in Russ Gamaut and Peter Drysdale (eds), Asia-Pacific Regionalism: Readings in International Economic Relations (Harper Educational in Association with the Australia-Japan Research Center, Australian National University, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Leszek Buszynski, ‘Southeast Asia in the Post-Cold War Era: Regionalism and Security’, Asian Survey, vol. 32 (1992), pp. 831–47;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pauline Kerr, Andrew Mack and Paul Evans, ‘The Evolving Security Discourse in the Asia-Pacific’, in Andrew Mack and John Ravenhill (eds), Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michael R. J. Vatikiotis, ‘A Giant Treads Carefully: Indonesia’s Foreign Policy in the 1990s’, in Robert Ross (ed.), East Asia in Transition: Toward a New Regional Order (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1995), pp. 225–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peter Petri, ‘The East Asian Trading Bloc: An Analytical History’, in Jeffrey Frankel and Miles Kahler (eds.), Regionalism and Rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia (Chicago,: University of Chicago Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ogura Kazuo, ‘A Call for a New Concept of Asia’, Japan Echo, vol. 23, no. 3 (Autumn 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akio Watanabe, ‘What Is Asia-Pacific Regionalism?’, Japan Review of International Affairs, Summer 1995, p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michael Haas, The Asian Way to Peace: A Story of Regional Cooperation (New York: Praeger, 1989), p. 282.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Noordin Sopiee, ‘Political Issues Associated with Economic Cooperation in East Asia’, ASEAN-ISIS Monitor, no. 4 (July-September 1992), pp. 8–16;

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hadi Soesastro, ‘ASEAN and APEC: Do Concentric Circles Work?’, Pacific Review, vol. 8, no. 3 (1995), pp. 475–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nobutoshi Akao, ‘Strategy for APEC: A Japanese View’, Japan Review of International Affairs, Summer 1995, pp. 169–77.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quoted in Makoto Kuroda, ‘APEC Needs No Fences’, Tokyo, Ronza (in Japanese), July 95, pp. 32–5, in Foreign Broadcasting Information Service - East Asia (hereafter FBIS-EAS), 30 June, 1995, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bilson Kurus, ‘Understanding ASEAN: Benefits and Raison d’Etre’, Asian Survey, vol. 33 (1993), p. 827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. L. H. M. Ling, ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Postcolonial Critique’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 3, no. 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Denny Roy, ‘Singapore, China, and the “Soft Authoritarian” Challenge’, Asian Survey, vol. 34, no. 3 (March 1994), pp. 231–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miles Kahler, ‘Institution-Building in the Pacific’, in Andrew Mack and John Ravenhill (eds), Pacific Cooperaion: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. See, for example, Kishore Mahbubani, ‘The West and the Rest’, The National Interest, vol. 28 (Summer 1992), pp. 3–12; The Dangers of Decadence–What the Rest can Teach the West’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 72 (September/October 1993); ‘The United States: “Go East, Young Man”’, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 17 (Spring 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bilahari Kausikan, ‘Asia’s Different Standard’, Foreign Policy, vol. 92 (Fall 1993), pp. 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanishka Jayasuriya, ‘Sinapore: The Politics of Regional Definition’, Pacific Review, vol. 7, no. 4 (1994), p. 415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hadi Soesastro, ‘ASEAN and APEC: Do Concentric Circles Work?’, Pacific Review, vol. 8, no. 3 (1995), p. 476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War (New York: Modern Library, 1951), p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mahamed Jawhar bin Hassan, ‘Southeast Asia and the Major Powers’, Pacific Review, vol. 8, no. 3 (1995), pp. 508–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Yong Deng

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deng, Y. (1997). ASEAN: From Neutrality to Centrality. In: Promoting Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230380127_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics