Abstract
For over two thousand years, ethical systems in the West have relied on post-mortem rewards and punishments. Plato separated hell, purgatory and paradise into geographical ‘regions’ and articulated concrete steps of bodily punishment after death. He did this specifically to save the state the need physically to coerce people: ‘hell and heaven were alternatives to police, prisons, torture chambers and concentration camps on earth’ (Anthony, 1973, p. 121; see also Arendt, 1961, pp. 111, 130).
Modern ethical systems distrust a system of celestial incentives and the implicit self-interest which such a system encourages.
(Ulrich Simon, ‘Heaven’, in Macquarrie and Childress, A New Dictionary of Christian Ethics, 1986)
‘I don’t see the point of religion if there’s no heaven’, said Ursula. ‘I mean, why be good, if you’re not going to be rewarded for it?’
(David Lodge, Paradise News, 1992, p. 257)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 Tony Walter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walter, T. (1996). Ethics without Eternity. In: The Eclipse of Eternity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379770_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379770_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39264-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37977-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)