Opportunities of Being Multinational: A Study of Organizational Rejuvenation, Relationships and Knowledge

  • Maria Adenfelt
  • Katarina Lagerström

Abstract

In the global environment of this century, numerous multinational enterprises (MNEs) across practically all industries consider the pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities by taking entrepreneurial actions as the critical means of competitive advantage (Kuratko et al., 2001). When taking place within large established enterprises, these actions are labelled corporate entrepreneurship (Covin and Miles, 1999; Dess et al., 2003; Sharma and Chrisman, 1999).

Keywords

Business Process Entrepreneurial Action Business Unit Strategic Management Journal Opportunity Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2002). The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (11), 979–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S. (2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (1), 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohendet, P., Kern, F., Mehmanpazir, B. and Munier, F. (1999). Knowledge Coordination, Competence Creation and Integrated Networks in Globalised Firms, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23 (3), 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Covin, J.G. and Miles, M.P. (1999). Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit of Competitive Advantage, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), 47–63.Google Scholar
  5. Dess, G., Ireland, R., Zahra, S., Floyd, S., Janney, J. and Lane, P. (2003). Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 351–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckhardt, J.T. and Shane, S.A. (2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Floyd, S.W. and Wooldridge, B. (1999). Knowledge Creation and Social Networks in Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Renewal of Organizational Capability, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), 123–43.Google Scholar
  8. Forsgren, M. och Johanson, J. (1992). Managing Networks in International Business, Philadelphia: Gordon … Breach.Google Scholar
  9. Grant, R. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (2), 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (1994). Organizing for Knowledge Flows within MNCs, International Business Review, 3 (4), 443–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L. (2001). Integrating Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Action to Create Firm Wealth, Academy of Management Executive, 15 (1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jack, S.L. and Anderson, A.R. (2002). The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process, Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (5), 467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kanter, R.M. (1982). The Middle Manager as Innovator, Harvard Business Review, July–August, 95–105.Google Scholar
  14. Kuratko D.F., Ireland, R.D. and Hornsby, J.S. (2001). Improving Performance through Entrepreneurial Actions: Acordia’s Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy, Academy of Management Executive, 15 (4), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Madhok, A. and Phene, A. (2001). The Co-evolution Advantage: Strategic Management Theory and the Eclectic Paradigm, International Journal of Economics of Business, 8 (2), 243–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McGrath, C. and Krackhardt, D. (2003). Network Conditions for Organizational Change, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39 (3), 324–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of entrepreneurship in ‘Three Types of Firms’, Management Science, 29 (7), 770–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in Strategy Formulation, Management Science, 24 (9), 934–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. (1997). The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value-Creation, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Penrose, E.T. (1980). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper … Row.Google Scholar
  22. Shane, S., Locke, E. and Collins, C. (2003). Entrepreneurial Motivation, Human Resources Management Review, 13, 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma, P. and Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), 11–27.Google Scholar
  24. Stevenson, H.H and Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management, Strategic Management Journal, 11/Special Issue, 17–27.Google Scholar
  25. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor’s Perspective, in J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (Eds) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  26. Zahra, S.A. (1993). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behaviour: A Critique and Extension, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  27. Zahra, S.A., Nielsen, A.P. and Bogner, W.C. (1999). Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge and Competence Development, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), 169–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pervez Ghauri, Amjad Hadjikhani and Jan Johanson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Adenfelt
  • Katarina Lagerström

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations