The Importance of Competition and Cooperation for the Exploration of Innovation Opportunities

  • Maria Bengtsson
  • Jessica Eriksson
  • Sören Kock

Abstract

The business landscape is continuously changing. Markets as well as technologies develop, sometimes rapidly, as innovations destroy old technologies and disrupt markets, at times incrementally, while products and processes are adjusted and refined (see e.g. D’Aveni, 1994; Hamel and Prahalad, 1994; Makadok, 1998; Nagarajan and Mitchell, 1998). Consequently, the ability to explore new opportunities and develop new technology has become increasingly important. Technological development is crucial for business and market opportunities and for the competitiveness of firms in many industries (cf. Rice, et al., 2001). In this chapter, we focus on the exploration of opportunities related to technological innovations.

Keywords

Marketing Expense Arena Blindness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, S.A. and Busenitz, L.W. (2001). The Entrepreneurship of Resource-based Theory, Journal of Management, 27 (6), 755–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson, M. (1998). Climates of Competition, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Bengtsson, M. and Eriksson, J. (2002). Stickiness and Leakiness in Inter-organizational Innovation Projects, in K. Sahlin-Andersson and A. Söderholm (Eds) Regenerated Projects. Beyond Project Management. New Perspectives on the Temporary—Permanent Dilemma. Festschrift for Rolf A. Lundin. Liber: Malmö.Google Scholar
  4. Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S. (1999). Cooperation and Competition in Relationships among Competitors in Business Networks, The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 14 (3), 178–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bengtsson, M. and Sölvell, Ö. (2004). Climates of Competition: Clusters and Innovative Performance, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20 (3), 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourgeois III, L.J. (1981). On the Measurement of Organizational Slack, Academy of Management Review, 6 (1), 29–39.Google Scholar
  7. Brahm, R. (1995). National Targeting Policies, High-Technology Industries, and Excessive Competition, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bresman, H. and Sölvell, O. (1997). Local and Global Forces in The Innovation Process of The Multinational Enterprise — An Hour-Glass Model, in H. Eskelinen (Ed.) NORDREFO 1997:3. Special Issue: Regional Specialisation and Local Environment — Learning and Competitiveness, Stockholm, 43–64.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective, Organization Science, 12 (2), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt, B. S. (1992). Structural Holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Busenitz, L.W., West III, G.P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N. and Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd Edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing The Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Easton, G. (1990). Relationships Among Competitors, in G. Day, B. Weitz and R. Wensley (Eds) The Interface of Marketing and Strategy, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc., 57–100.Google Scholar
  16. Eckhardt, J.T. and Shane, S.A. (2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C.B. (1996). Resource Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms, Organization Science, 10 (2), 136–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eilig, J. (2001). Introduction, in Jerry Eilig (Ed.) Dynamic Competition and Dynamic Policy. Technology, Innovation and Antitrust Issues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galaskiewicz, J. and A. Zaheer (1999). Networks of Competitive Advantage, in S. Andrews and D. Knoke (Eds) Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 237–61.Google Scholar
  20. Gnyawali, D.R. and Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective, Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), 431–45.Google Scholar
  21. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadjikhani, A. and Thilenius, P. (2004). A View on Commitment in the Industrial Long-Term Relationship, International Business Review; Under Review Process, (Unpublished manuscript; Uppsala University).Google Scholar
  23. Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. (1989). No Business is an Island — The Network Concept of Business Strategy, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5 (3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C.K. (1994). Competing for the Future, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harari, O. (1999). Obsolete.com?, Management Review, 88 (8), 31–4.Google Scholar
  27. Hayek, F.A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society, The American Economic Review, 35 (4), 519–30.Google Scholar
  28. Hite J. M. (2003). Patterns of Multidimensionality among Embedded Network Ties: A Typology of Relational Embeddedness in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms, Strategic Organization, 1 (1), 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingram, P. and Baum, J.A.C. (1997). Opportunity and Constraint: Organizations’ Learning from the Operating and Competitive Experience of Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 18, Special Issue: Organizational and Competitive Interactions, 75–98.Google Scholar
  30. Inkpen, A.C. and Crossan, M. (1996). Believing is Seeing: Joint Ventures and Organizational Learning, Journal of Management Studies, 32 (5), 596–618.Google Scholar
  31. Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kirzner, I.M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach, Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (1), 60–85.Google Scholar
  33. Kock, S. (1991). A Strategic Process for Gaining External Resources through Long-Lasting Relationships. Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  34. Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., and Sparks, J. (1998). The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances, Organization Science, 9 (3), 85–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., and Sparks, J. (1999). Barriers to Interorganizational Learning: Developing Collective Knowledge Across Corporate Boundaries, Advances in Management Cognition and Organizational Information Processing, 6, 115–47.Google Scholar
  36. Makadok, R. (1998). Can First-Mover and Early-Mover Advantages be Sustained in An Industry with Low Barriers to Entry/Imitation?, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 683–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science, 2 (1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1979). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, 2nd edn, Bergen: Universitetsförlaget.Google Scholar
  39. March, J.G. and Sevón, G. (1988) Gossip, Information and Decision-Making, in J.G. March (ed.) Decision and Organizations. Oxford, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. 429–42Google Scholar
  40. Marsden, P.V. and Campbell, K.E. (1984). Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces, 63, 482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, D. and Chen, M-J. (1994). Sources and Consequences of Competitive Inertia: A Study of the U.S. Airline Industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nagarajan, A. and Mitchell, W. (1998). Evolutionary Diffusion: Internal and External Methods Used to Acquire Encompassing, Complementary, and Incremental Technological Changes in The Lithotripsy Industry, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 477–96.Google Scholar
  43. Oakley, A. (1990). Schumpeter’s Theory of Capitalist Motion, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  44. Oliver, A.L (2004). On the Duality of Competition and Cooperation: Interorganizational Networks within Knowledge-intensive Industries, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20 (1–2), 151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pouder, R. and St John, C. (1996). Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation, Academy of Management Review, 21 (4), 1192–225.Google Scholar
  47. Powell, W.W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy. Network Forms of Organization, Research in Organization Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  48. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rice, M.P., Kelley, D., Peters, L., and O’Connor, G.C. (2001). Radical Innovation: Triggering Initiation of Opportunity Recognition and Evaluation, R…D Management, 31 (4), 409–20.Google Scholar
  50. Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  51. Shaanan, J. and Feinberg, R.M (1995). Dynamic Competition and Price Adjustments, Southern Economic Journal, 62, 460–66. Chapel Hill; Oct.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shane, S., Locke, E.A. and Collins, C.J. (2003). Entrepreneurial Motivation, Human Resource Management Review, 13 (2), 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to The Transfer of Best Practice Within The Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (10), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teece, D. and Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (3), 537–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Törnquist, G. (Ed.) (1986). Svenskt näringsliv — i geogra fiskt perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  56. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. and De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities, Organization Science, 10 (5), 551–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pervez Ghauri, Amjad Hadjikhani and Jan Johanson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Bengtsson
  • Jessica Eriksson
  • Sören Kock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations