Abstract
The thesis of this chapter is that the characteristics of the business network surrounding the firm have a profound impact on how the firm finds and exploits opportunities. Characteristics of networks and relations between network actors have been increasingly researched during recent decades (see e.g. Dyer and Chu, 2000; Grabher, 1993; Granovetter, 1985, 1992; Gulati, 1998, 1999; Gulati et al., 2000; Håkansson and Snehota, 1995; Halinen and Törnroos, 1998; Kogut, 2000; McEvily and Zaheer, 1999; Rowley et al., 2000; Uzzi, 1996, 1997; Zukin and Di Maggio, 1990). In parallel, a wide and strong tradition of research has emerged on the nature of opportunity, especially among entrepreneurship researchers (see e.g. Ardichvili et al., 2003; Eckhardt and Shane, 2003; Shane, 2000). We aim to combine these two traditions and seek to develop a model for analyzing the relation between different types of opportunities and different types of relationships and networks. Entrepreneurial behavior and social networks have previously been explored (Ardichvili et al., 2003; Ellis, 2000; Jack and Anderson, 2002; Kenney and Goe, 2004; Simsek et al., 2003). These studies have observed that there seems to be a relation between finding an opportunity and the characteristics of the social network, but to our knowledge there are no studies investigating the character of relationships and network configurations and how it influences the firm’s way of finding and exploiting opportunities.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersson, U. and Forsgren, M. (1996). Subsidiary Embeddedness and Control in the Multinational Corporation, International Business Review, 5 (5), 487–508.
Andersson, U. and Forsgren, M. (2000). In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations, Management International Review, 40 (4), 329–50.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Pedersen, T. (2001). Subsidiary Performance in multinational corporations: The Importance of Technology Embeddedness, International Business Review, 10 (1), 3–23.
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S. (2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (1), 105–23.
Burt, R. (1992a). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. (1992b). The Social Structure of Competition, in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds) Networks and Organizations. Structure, Form and Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur, Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.
Choi, Y. R. and Shephard, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurs Decisions to Exploit Opportunities, Journal of Management, 30 (3), 377–95.
Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cook, K. S. and Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks, American Sociological Review, 43, 721–38.
Dyer, J. H. and Chu, W. (2000). The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea, Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2), 259–85.
Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 333–49.
El-Ansary, A. I. and Stern L. W. (1972). Power Measurement in the Distribution Channel, Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (1), 47–52.
Ellis, P. (2000). Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry, Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (3), 443–69.
Ford, D., Gadde, L-E., Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. (2003). Managing Business Relationships, Chichester: Wiley.
Gaski, J. F. (1984). The Theory of Power and Conflicts in Channels of Distribution, Journal of Marketing, 48 (Summer), 9–29.
Grabber, G. (1993). Rediscovering the Social in the Economics of Interfirm Relations, in G. Grabher (Ed.) The Embedded Firm, London: Routledge.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481–510.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology, in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (4), 293–18.
Gulati, R. (1999). Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation, Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5), 397–420.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 203–15.
Håkansson, H. (1989). Corporate Technological Behaviour: Co-operation and Networks, London: Routledge.
Håkansson, H. (Ed.) (1982). International Marketing and Purchasing: An Interaction Approach, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks, London: Routledge.
Halinen, A. and Törnroos, J-A. (1998). The Role of Embeddedness in the Evolution of Business Networks, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14 (3), 187–205.
Hansen, M.T. (1999). The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1), 82–111.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Review, 35 (4), 519–30.
Hunt, S. D. and Nevin, J. R. (1974). Power in a Channel of Distribution: Sources and Consequences, Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May), 186–93.
Jack, S. L. and Anderson, A. (2002). The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process, Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (5), 467–87.
Kenney, M. and Goe, W. R. (2004). The Role of Social Embeddedness in Professorial Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UC Berkeley and Stanford, Research Policy, 33 (5), 691–707.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition … Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I. M. (1992). The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics, London: Routledge.
Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach, Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (1), 60–85.
Kogut, B. (2000). The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 405–25.
Laage-Hellman, J. (1989). Technological Development in Industrial Networks. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Internorganizational Learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (5), 461–77.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science, 2 (1), 71–87.
McEvily, B. and Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 20 (12), 1133–56.
Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in Global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D. and Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in Steel and Semiconductor Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369–86.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shane, S. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Organization Science, 11(4), 448–69.
Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H. and Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 427–42.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 61 (4), 674–98.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 35–67.
Winter, S. (1987). Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets, in D. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge — Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test, Organization Science, 6 (1), 76–92.
Zukin, S. and Di Maggio, P. J. (Eds) (1990), Structure of Capital, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Pervez Ghauri, Amjad Hadjikhani and Jan Johanson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andersson, U., Holm, D.B., Johanson, M. (2005). Opportunities, Relational Embeddedness and Network Structure. In: Ghauri, P., Hadjikhani, A., Johanson, J. (eds) Managing Opportunity Development in Business Networks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379695_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379695_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52457-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37969-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)