Advertisement

Opportunities, Relational Embeddedness and Network Structure

  • Ulf Andersson
  • Desireé Blankenburg Holm
  • Martin Johanson

Abstract

The thesis of this chapter is that the characteristics of the business network surrounding the firm have a profound impact on how the firm finds and exploits opportunities. Characteristics of networks and relations between network actors have been increasingly researched during recent decades (see e.g. Dyer and Chu, 2000; Grabher, 1993; Granovetter, 1985, 1992; Gulati, 1998, 1999; Gulati et al., 2000; Håkansson and Snehota, 1995; Halinen and Törnroos, 1998; Kogut, 2000; McEvily and Zaheer, 1999; Rowley et al., 2000; Uzzi, 1996, 1997; Zukin and Di Maggio, 1990). In parallel, a wide and strong tradition of research has emerged on the nature of opportunity, especially among entrepreneurship researchers (see e.g. Ardichvili et al., 2003; Eckhardt and Shane, 2003; Shane, 2000). We aim to combine these two traditions and seek to develop a model for analyzing the relation between different types of opportunities and different types of relationships and networks. Entrepreneurial behavior and social networks have previously been explored (Ardichvili et al., 2003; Ellis, 2000; Jack and Anderson, 2002; Kenney and Goe, 2004; Simsek et al., 2003). These studies have observed that there seems to be a relation between finding an opportunity and the characteristics of the social network, but to our knowledge there are no studies investigating the character of relationships and network configurations and how it influences the firm’s way of finding and exploiting opportunities.

Keywords

Network Structure Open Network Market Opportunity Strategic Management Journal Business Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, U. and Forsgren, M. (1996). Subsidiary Embeddedness and Control in the Multinational Corporation, International Business Review, 5 (5), 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, U. and Forsgren, M. (2000). In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations, Management International Review, 40 (4), 329–50.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Pedersen, T. (2001). Subsidiary Performance in multinational corporations: The Importance of Technology Embeddedness, International Business Review, 10 (1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S. (2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (1), 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt, R. (1992a). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, R. (1992b). The Social Structure of Competition, in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds) Networks and Organizations. Structure, Form and Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur, Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, Y. R. and Shephard, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurs Decisions to Exploit Opportunities, Journal of Management, 30 (3), 377–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, K. S. and Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks, American Sociological Review, 43, 721–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer, J. H. and Chu, W. (2000). The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea, Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2), 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Ansary, A. I. and Stern L. W. (1972). Power Measurement in the Distribution Channel, Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (1), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, P. (2000). Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry, Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (3), 443–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, D., Gadde, L-E., Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. (2003). Managing Business Relationships, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Gaski, J. F. (1984). The Theory of Power and Conflicts in Channels of Distribution, Journal of Marketing, 48 (Summer), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grabber, G. (1993). Rediscovering the Social in the Economics of Interfirm Relations, in G. Grabher (Ed.) The Embedded Firm, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology, in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (4), 293–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gulati, R. (1999). Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation, Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5), 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Håkansson, H. (1989). Corporate Technological Behaviour: Co-operation and Networks, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Håkansson, H. (Ed.) (1982). International Marketing and Purchasing: An Interaction Approach, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Halinen, A. and Törnroos, J-A. (1998). The Role of Embeddedness in the Evolution of Business Networks, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14 (3), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen, M.T. (1999). The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1), 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Review, 35 (4), 519–30.Google Scholar
  31. Hunt, S. D. and Nevin, J. R. (1974). Power in a Channel of Distribution: Sources and Consequences, Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May), 186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jack, S. L. and Anderson, A. (2002). The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process, Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (5), 467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenney, M. and Goe, W. R. (2004). The Role of Social Embeddedness in Professorial Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UC Berkeley and Stanford, Research Policy, 33 (5), 691–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition … Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kirzner, I. M. (1992). The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach, Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (1), 60–85.Google Scholar
  37. Kogut, B. (2000). The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laage-Hellman, J. (1989). Technological Development in Industrial Networks. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  39. Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Internorganizational Learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (5), 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science, 2 (1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McEvily, B. and Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 20 (12), 1133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in Global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rowley, T., Behrens, D. and Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in Steel and Semiconductor Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shane, S. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Organization Science, 11(4), 448–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H. and Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective, Journal of Management, 29 (3), 427–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uzzi, B. (1996). The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 61 (4), 674–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winter, S. (1987). Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets, in D. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge — Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  50. Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test, Organization Science, 6 (1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zukin, S. and Di Maggio, P. J. (Eds) (1990), Structure of Capital, Cambridge: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pervez Ghauri, Amjad Hadjikhani and Jan Johanson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Andersson
  • Desireé Blankenburg Holm
  • Martin Johanson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations