Abstract
On October 22, 1893, Hardy concluded a letter to Mrs Henniker —identified by Florence Hardy as one of the models for Sue Bridehead—by asking her what he should call the heroine of his new novel.1 It appears from the letter that he had not yet begun work on the actual writing of the book, and evidence of other literary activity during the autumn of 1893 the period of his collaboration with Mrs Henniker on the story “The Spectre of the Real”,2 serves to cast further doubt on the statement in the Preface to the first edition of Jude that the manuscript was written “at full length” from August 1893 onwards, on the basis of an outline completed the previous spring (vii). Clearly, however, the book was very much in Hardy’s mind, and although on December 1, 1893, he told Mrs Henniker that he was reluctant to go on with it, by January 15, 1894, he was becoming enthusiastic about his heroine; by April 7 the story had carried him into such “un-expected fields” that he wrote to Harper & Brothers suggesting cancellation of their agreement with him.3 In the event, Hardy prepared a heavily bowdlerised serial version of the novel for Harper’s New Monthly Magazine and then restored the original text for the first edition, published by Osgood, Mcllvaine in November 1895.4
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
and Robert C. Slack, ‘The Text of Hardy’s jude the Obscure’, Nineteenth Century Fiction, 11 (1957) 261–275, drawn from his unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, ‘A Variorum Edition of Thomas Hardy’s Jude the Obscure’ (Univ. of Pittsburgh, 1953).
The manuscript is discussed in John Paterson, ‘The Genesis of Jude the Obscure’, Studies in Philolory. 57 (1960). 87–98.
Heilman, ‘Hardy’s Sue Bridehead’, Nineteenth Century Fiction, 20 (1966), 307–323; Later Years, p. 42.
Theodore Alois Buckley, trans., The Tragedies of Sophocles : in English Prose (London, 1849), p. 53; Hardy underlined most of this passage in his own copy (Adams).
Gosse, ‘Mr. Hardy’s New Novel’, Cosmopolis, I (January 1896), 60–69 (partly quoted Thomas Hardy and His Readers, pp. 117–122); the letters are quoted in Later Years, pp. 40–43. Thomas Hardy and His Readers obscures the sequence by omitting the St James’s Gazette review and printing two of the letters to Gosse after the Cosmopolis review.
C. B. Tinker and H. F. Lowry, eds., The Poetical Works of Matthew Arnold (London, 1950), pp. 256, 261.
Copyright information
© 1994 Michael Millgate
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Millgate, M. (1994). Jude the Obscure. In: Thomas Hardy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379534_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379534_26
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62316-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37953-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)