Advertisement

Nothingness and the Return of Metaphysics

  • George Pattison

Abstract

In the Augustinian tradition nothingness is thought through its refractions in a sequence of interlocking concepts: creaturely dependence, fallenness, time, and the will (or self) in its existential failure to be what it is. Nonetheless, nothingness itself is not thought in its thematic unity. In the case of Augustine himself this is because its various manifestations are only united by virtue of the fact that (like everything else) they are modifications of the one being that is the prime metaphysical reality. In the case of the Augustinianism of the Reformers it is because the very possibility of thinking these fundamental religious realities is denied. Yet, by virtue of their thoroughgoing foregrounding of the crisis of the will, the Reformers paradoxically prepared the way for a reinvention of metaphysics on the basis of the self-in-search-of-itself — a reinvention that would therefore locate nothingness at the very centre of the metaphysical project. This turn in the history of metaphysics is above all associated with the name of Hegel and so it is to Hegel that we now turn.

Keywords

Sufficient Reason Dialectical Logic Pure Thought Eternal Recurrence Philosophical Fragment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    J.M.E. McTaggart, Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1896) p. 49.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    S. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992) p. 110.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    A. Trendelenburg, Logische Untersuchungen I (Berlin, 1840) p. 44.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Hegel, Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975) p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 9.
    A. Kojève, Introduction à la Lecture de Hegel (Paris: Gallimard, 1947) p. 540.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977) p. 9.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    N.P. Williams, The Ideas of the Fall and of Original Sin (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1927) p. 505. For precedents to such a position in the Christian tradition, see John Hick’s account of what he calls the ‘felix culpa’ theme in Christian theology, alluding to a medieval verse which read ‘O happy fault, which secured such and so great a redemption.’Google Scholar
  8. 19.
    In John Hick, Evil and the God of Love (London: Fontana, 1968) pp. 103–4 and 323f.Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    See, for example, the debate between Thulstrup and Taylor. N. Thul-strup, Kierkegaard’s Relation to Hegel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Mark C. Taylor, Journeys to Selfhood: Hegel and Kierkegaard (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Roger Poole in Kierkegaard: The Indirect Communication (London and Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993) insists on ‘keeping the pseudonyms apart.’ A more widely held view is that of Sylvia Walsh, who writes, ‘the enterprise of trying to distinguish between the pseudonyms is not nearly so important as discerning the movements of thought within the authorship.’Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    In S. Walsh, Living Poetically. Kierkegaard’s Existential Aesthetics (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994) p. 15. My own Kierkegaard: The Aesthetic and the Religious tries to explore the issue of indirect communication by another route that is more concerned with the literary form of the various writings rather than their being ascribed to particular pseudonymous authors.Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    See George Pattison, Kierkegaard: The Aesthetic and the Religious (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991) pp. 140–3.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    S. Kierkegaard, The Point of View (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939), pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
  15. 25.
    S. Kierkegaard, The Concept of Anxiety (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980) p. 41. Further references are given as CA in the text.Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    C. Rosenkranz, Psychologie (1843) p. 5.Google Scholar
  17. 27.
    S. Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985) p. 18. Further references are given as PF in the text.Google Scholar
  18. 28.
    S. Kierkegaard, Either/Or II (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987) p. 216. Further references are given as EO II in the text.Google Scholar
  19. 29.
    A. Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, Vol. I (New York: Dover, 1966) p. 412. Further references are given in the text as WWR I or II.Google Scholar
  20. 30.
    A. Schopenhauer, Lieber die Vierfacher Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde. Werke in zehn Bänden Bd. V (Zürich: Diogenes, 1977) p. 41. Further references are given in the text as FFR.Google Scholar
  21. 33.
    F. Nietzsche, The Will to Power (New York: Vintage, 1968) 855 (references will be given according to entry rather than to page number; further references will be given as WP in the text).Google Scholar
  22. 33.
    In a similar vein are such remarks as the following: ‘The spread of Buddhism (not its origin) is thus to a considerable extent dependent on the excessive and almost exclusive rice-fare of the Indians, and on the universal enervation that results therefrom.’ F. Nietzsche, The Joyful Wisdom (London: Foulis, 1910), p. 173 (Book 1II.134). Noting the reservation regarding the ‘origin’ of Buddhism, the thrust of the passage is in a strongly reductionist direction. On a grander scale is the whole of Book Four of The Will to Power: ‘Discipline and Breeding’.Google Scholar
  23. 37.
    F. Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Penguin: Harmondsworth, 1961, 1969) pp. 41–2. Further references are given as Z in the text. I have occasionally adapted Hollingdale’s translation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© George Pattison 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Pattison
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations