Skip to main content
  • 129 Accesses

Abstract

Life for everybody working for large organisations has been made more difficult by a need to sustain performance in the face of a rapidly changing, increasingly volatile and unpredictable world. It is not unusual for an effective strategic response to new external threats to require significant changes in employee responsibilities, accompanied by revisions in organisational structure. Nohria and Berkley (1994) observed that the world is no longer constituted of stable, unitary organisations built upon rules, procedures and norms with leaders who are able to be rational, universalistic thinkers. Many organisations are now more unstable, facing greater uncertainty and are required to respond rapidly to changing circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon. ‘Better management would allow American universities to cope with less’, The Economist, 9 July 2011, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. (1998) Transformational Leadership (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. (2007) ‘Concepts of leadership’, in Vecchio, R. (ed.), Leadership: Understanding the Dynamics of Power and Influence in Organizations (2nd ed.) (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beachum, F. (2004) ‘Leadership stability and principal turnover: a study of effects on school and student performance indicators’, Proceeding University Council for Educational Administration Conference, Nashville, 31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. (1978) Leadership (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Z.S. and Hochwarter, W.A. (2008) ‘Perceived organizational support and performance: relationships across levels of organizational cynicism’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23 (1), 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, D. (2001) ‘Enablement constraint and the seven habits of highly effective people’, Management Communications Quarterly, 14 (3), 491–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I. (2011) Public Sector Management: Mission Impossible? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S.R. and Gulledge, K.A. (1992) ‘Principles-centred leadership’, Journal for Quality and Participation, 15 (4), 70–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, J.V. and Campbell, K.C. (2006) ‘The role of democratic values in transformational leadership’, Administration & Society, 38 (5), 556–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Densten, I.L. (1999) ‘Senior Australian law enforcement leadership under examination’, Policing, 22, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotlitch, D.L. and Cairo, P. (2003) Why CEOs Fail: The 11 Behaviors That Can Derail Your Climb to the Top and How to Manage Them (San Francisco: JosseyBass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. and Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990) ‘Effects of perceived organizational support on employee diligence, innovation, and commitment’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P. and Spicer, A. (2003) ‘Working at a cynical distance: implications for power, subjectivity and resistance’, Organization, 10 (1), 157–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.K. (2002) ‘Organizational change and development’, in Morash, M. and Ford, J.K. (eds.) The Move to Community Policing: Making Change Happen (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), 126–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, D. (2001) ‘Style and substance in education leadership: further education (FE) as a case in point’, Education Policy, 16 (3), 181–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. and Heck, R.H. (1996) ‘Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: a review of the empirical research’, Educational Administration Quarterly, 32 (1), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2001) ‘Building the capacity for school improvement’, School Leadership and Management, 21 (3), 261–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, M. (2004) Armageddon: The Battle for Germany 1944–1945 (London: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, S., Bjorklund, R. and Green, V. (2009) ‘Leadership and culture: examining the relationship between cultural background and leadership perceptions’, Journal of Global Business Issues, 3 (2), 149–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakas, F. (2010) ‘Exploring value compasses of leaders in organizations: introducing nine spiritual anchors’, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2004) Bad Leadership (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2005) ‘How bad leadership happens’, Leader to Leader, 35, 41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2002) ‘Participative management and job satisfaction: lessons for management leadership’, Public Administration Review, 62 (2), 231–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (2007) ‘What leaders really do’, in Vecchio, R. (ed.) Leadership: Understanding the Dynamics of Power and Influence in Organizations (2nd ed.) (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press) 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. and Posner, B. (2003) The Leadership Challenge (San Francisco: JosseyBass).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLynn, F. (2010) The Burma Campaign (London: The Bodley Head).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J.T. and Ehrlich, S.B. (1987) ‘The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 30 (1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. and Berkley, J.D. (1994) ‘An action perspective: the crux of new management’, California Management Review, 36 (4), 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P. (2009) ‘Democratic government, institutional autonomy and the dynamics of change’, West European Politics, 32 (3), 439–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D.R. (2009) ‘Business leadership: three levels of ethical analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 525–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morash, M., Fulmer, R.M. and Conger, J.A. (2004) Growing Your Company’s Leaders (New York: AMACOM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransley, J. and Mazerolle, L. (2009) ‘Policing in an era of uncertainty’, Police Practice and Research, 10 (4), 365–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinheider, B. and Wuestewald, T. (2008) ‘From the bottom-up: sharing leadership in a police agency’, Police Practice and Research, 9 (2), 145–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. (2003) The Moral Capital of Leaders: Why Virtue Matters (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uzunoglu, S. (1999) ‘Transformation and self-development in Sufism’, Sizinti, 22 (3), 176–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. and Braga, A.A. (2006) Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Ian Chaston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaston, I. (2012). Leadership. In: Public Sector Reformation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379350_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics