Skip to main content

Failure

  • Chapter
  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

Analysis of a failure to implement a strategy that was designed to improve performance often reveals that the blame can be attributed to poor leadership. Events associated with politicians’ apparent inability to reduce the scale of national deficits are seen by many observers as exemplifying this scenario. In the USA, fundamental differences in political philosophies between the Democrats and Republicans by failing to approve an increase in the nation’s deficit ceiling during the summer of 2011 almost resulted in Congress plunging the country into economic chaos. Concurrently, differing views among the leaders of eurozone countries contributed to a weakening of the euro, severely damaging confidence in the financial community which, in turn, drove up government borrowing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon. (2002) ‘Managing merger madness’, Strategic Direction, 18 (11), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, C., Hirt, M. and Smit, S. (2011) ‘Have you tested your strategy lately?’, McKinsey Quarterly, January, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, S. (2006) ‘Strategies for public sector turnaround: lessons from the private sector?’ Administration and Society, 38 (3), 365–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G.A. and Walker, R. (2004) ‘Strategy content and public service organizations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 231–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B. and Mohamad, S. (1995) ‘The impact of the NHS internal market on the merger of colleges of midwifery and nursing: not just a case of putting the cart before the horse’, Journal of Management in Medicine, 9 (2), 14–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I. (2011) Public Sector Management, Mission Impossible? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, M. (1999) ‘Making the difference: quality strategy in the public sector’, Managing Service Quality, 9 (1), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DWP (2004) Building on New Deal (Sheffield: Department of Work and Pensions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairholm, G.W. (1991) Values Leadership: Towards a New Philosophy of Leadership (London: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, T. (2002) ‘Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature’, Health Services Management Research, 15 (2), 126–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, R.M. and Conger, J.A. (2004) Growing Your Company’s Leaders (New York: AMACOM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. ‘Don’t just stand there’, The Daily Telegraph, London, 9 August 2011, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giessner, S. and Van Quaquebeke, N. (2010) ‘Using a relational models perspective to understand normatively appropriate conduct in ethical leadership’, Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrera, R. ‘A need to reconnect’, Financial Times, 13 March 2009, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, M.C. (1996) ‘Are there alternatives to merger?’ Health Manpower Management, 22 (5), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, D.I. (2000) ‘Mergers in action: an examination of the efficacy of a merger between three NHS hospital trusts and the subsequent effects of that merger’, Total Quality Management, 11 (4/6), S589–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. and Chapman, C. (2004) ‘Towards differentiated improvement for schools in challenging circumstances’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 52 (4), 417–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. and Ranson, S. (2005) ‘The contradictions of education policy: disadvantage and achievement’, British Educational Research Journal, 31 (5), 571–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., Clarke, P., James, S., Harris, B. and Gunraj, J. (2005) Improving Schools in Difficulty (London: Continuum Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. ‘In this nightmare week there have been countless examples of real heroism’, the Daily Telegraph, London, 10 August, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, N.S. (2010), ‘Three “brutal facts” that provide strategic direction for healthcare delivery systems: preparing for the end of the healthcare bubble’, Journal of Healthcare Management, 56 (3), 163–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, N. (2011) ‘Changing economics in an era of healthcare reform’, Journal of Healthcare Management, 56 (1), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R. and Brown, K. (2002) ‘The government service delivery project: a case study of the push and pull of central government co-ordination’, Public Management Review, 4 (4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Mandell, M., Brown, K. and Woolcock, G. (2004) ‘Network structures: working differently and changing expectations’, Public Administration Review, 64 (3), 363–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Mandell, R. and Brown, K. (2006) ‘Mixing state, market and network modes: the role of governments in ‘crowded domain’ policy’, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9 (1), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klakegg, O.J. (2009) ‘Pursuing relevance and sustainability improvement strategies for major public projects’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2 (4), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A. and Korac-Kakabadse, N. (2000) ‘Mapping institutional impacts of lean communication in lean agencies: information technology illiteracy and leadership failure’, Administration and Society, 32 (1), 29–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, M., Toombs, L.A. and Wright, P. (2000) ‘Napoleon’s tragic march home from Moscow: lessons in hubris’, The Academy of Management Executive, 14 (1), 117–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, T., Stewart, K. and Ginsburg. P. (2011) Lessons from the Field: Making Accountable Care Organizations Real (Brie: National Institute for Health Care Reform).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., Garcia, J.A. and Dixit, M.K. (2010) ‘Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: review of literature’, Facilities, 28 (9/10), 440–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M. and Monsey, B. (2001) Collaboration: What Makes It Work (St Paul, Minn.: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, H. (1991) ‘Organizational decline: NASA and the lifecycle of bureaus’, Public Administration Review, 51, 308–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R.K. (2004) ‘Changing the organization but maintaining the culture: the centrality of organisational mission’, Strategic Change, 13 (6), 323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. (1977) Disappointing Marriage: A Study of the Gains from Merger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. and Dollery, B. (2005) ‘Institutional breakdown? An exploratory taxonomy of Australian university failure’, Prometheus, 23 (4), 385–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, G. (2002) ‘Participation as the key to successful change–a public sector case study’, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23 (8), 442–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L.J. (1997) ‘Treating networks seriously: practical research-based agendas in public administration’, Public Administration Review, 57 (1), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (2001) The Politics of Bureaucracy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T. (2003) Poor Kids in a Rich Country: America’s Children in Comparative Perspective (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. (2003) Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (3rd ed.) (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salit, S., Fass, S. and Nowak, M. (2002) ‘Out of the frying pan: New York City hospitals in an age of deregulation’, Health Affairs, 21 (1), 127–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A.J., Levy, O. and Dvir, D. (1997) ‘Mapping the dimensions of project success’, Project Management Journal, 28 (2), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1995) ‘The unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector’, International Journal of Public Administration, 2, 277–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spang, H.T., Bazzoli, G.T. and Arnould, R.J. (2001) ‘Hospital mergers and savings for consumers: exploring new evidence’, Health Affairs, 20 (4), 150–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.R. (2000) ‘Reinvention as reform: assessing the National Performance Review’, Public Administration Review, 60 (6), 508–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.R. and Jones, V. (1995) ‘Reinventing the Federal Government: the role of theory in reform implementation’, The American Review of Public Administration, 25 (2), 183–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzel, W. and Jonsonn, E. (1989) ‘Decline in organizations: a literature integration and extension’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Ian Chaston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaston, I. (2012). Failure. In: Public Sector Reformation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379350_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics