Skip to main content

Diplomatic Momentum

  • Chapter
Diplomacy
  • 312 Accesses

Abstract

The momentum of a negotiation might falter, even if the parties are serious about proceeding. This was a recurring problem with the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations, which started in September 1986 and was not finally completed until April 1994. Why might momentum falter? Why is it serious? And what might be done to prevent it? The first two questions are not especially problematical and have, in any case, already been touched upon. As a result, the greater part of this chapter will discuss the practical stratagems falling under the heading of the third — other than inducements such as side payments and guarantees offered by a mediator, which will be dealt with in Chapter 15.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Berridge, G. R., ‘Diplomacy and the Angola/Namibia Accords, December 1988’, International Affairs, 65(3), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J., Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a president (Bantam Books: New York, 1982): 267–429, on the Egypt-Israel negotiations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cradock, P., Experiences of China (John Murray: London, 1994): chs 16–20, 23, on the negotiations in 1983–84 for the transfer of Hong Kong from British to Chinese sovereignty.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, A., ‘Ending violent conflict in El Salvador’, in C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson and P. R. Aall (eds), Herding Cats: Multiparty mediation in a complex world (United States Institute of Peace Press: Washington, DC, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., ‘Inside the Afghan talks’, Foreign Policy, Fall, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press: Chicago/London, 1980): esp. chs 1–3, 11, 16 and 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, George J., Making Peace (Heinemann: London, 1999): 126–83, on the Good Friday agreement on Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Christopher, The Mediation Process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict, 2nd edn (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1996): 291–300, on deadlines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, W. B., Camp David: Peacemaking and politics (Brookings Institution: Washington, DC, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Dennis, Statecraft: And how to restore America’s standing in the world (Farrar, Straus & Giroux: New York, 2007): 205–7, on deadlines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. G., ‘How peace came to El Salvador’, Orbis, Winter, 1994: 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 G. R. Berridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berridge, G.R. (2010). Diplomatic Momentum. In: Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379275_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics