Diplomacy pp 192-204 | Cite as

Telecommunications

  • G. R. Berridge

Abstract

From ancient times until well into the nineteenth century, all messages, including diplomatic messages, were carried by hand. Even at the beginning of the twenty-first century, diplomatic couriers are still employed for the delivery of certain top-secret packages (Angell). But over the past century and a half, diplomatic messages have been increasingly carried by telecommunication: any mode of communication over a long distance (tele is Greek for ‘far’) that requires human agency only in the sending and reception of the message that it contains and not, as with a courier, in its conveyance. This chapter will consider the advantages and disadvantages of the different kinds of telecommunication. It will also give some emphasis to crisis diplomacy, because it is in this activity that telecommunication is often held to be of greatest value, and it is certainly here that it has received the greatest attention.

Keywords

Europe Syria Assure Turkey Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  1. Bruckner, Sandra, ‘Video Conferencing: The next best thing to being there’, State Magazine, December 2000 [www].Google Scholar
  2. Callaghan, James, Time and Chance (Collins: London, 1987): 344–6.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Raymond, Theatre of Power: The art of diplomatic signalling (Longman: London/New York, 1987): ch. 5.Google Scholar
  4. Dobrynin, Anatoly, In Confidence: Moscow’s ambassador to America’s six Cold War presidents (1962–86) (University of Washington Press: Seattle, 2001): 96–8.Google Scholar
  5. International Telecommunication Union, ‘History’ and ‘Landmarks’ [www].Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, Joe, ‘Wiring State: A progress report’, Foreign Service Journal, December 2005 [www].Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, Lyndon Baines, The Vantage Point: Perspectives of the presidency, 1963–1968 (Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London, 1972): ch. 13, mainly: 287–8, 297–304.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, R. A., The British Diplomatic Service 1815–1914 (Smythe: London, 1983): ch. 7.Google Scholar
  9. Kennedy, P. M., ‘Imperial cable communications and strategy, 1870–1914’, English Historical Review, Volume 86, October 1971: 728–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kissinger, Henry A., Years of Upheaval (Weidenfeld & Nicolson/Michael Joseph: London, 1982): chs 11 and 12.Google Scholar
  11. May, Ernest R., ‘The news media and diplomacy’, in Gordon A. Craig and Francis L. Loewenheim (eds), The Diplomats 1939–1979 (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1994).Google Scholar
  12. McNamara, Robert, Blundering Into Disaster: Surviving the first century of the nuclear age (Pantheon: New York, 1986): 10–13.Google Scholar
  13. Nickles, David Pauli, Under the Wire: How the telegraph changed diplomacy (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA/London, 2003).Google Scholar
  14. Patterson, Jr., Bradley H., The White House Staff: Inside the West Wing and beyond (Brookings: Washington, DC, 2000): 57–9.Google Scholar
  15. Rawnsley, Gary D., Radio Diplomacy and Propaganda: The BBC and VOA in international politics, 1956–64 (Macmillan — now Palgrave: Basingstoke, 1996).Google Scholar
  16. Rawnsley, Gary D., ‘Monitored broadcasts and diplomacy’, in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (Macmillan — now Palgrave: Basingstoke, 1999).Google Scholar
  17. Smith, Gerard C., Disarming Diplomat: The memoirs of Gerard C. Smith, arms control negotiator (Madison: New York, 1996): 107–9, 174–5.Google Scholar
  18. United States Institute of Peace, Virtual Diplomacy Initiative [www].Google Scholar
  19. Yeltsin, Boris, Midnight Diaries (Phoenix: London, 2001): ch. 16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© G. R. Berridge 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Berridge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations