Skip to main content
  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

The question with which we are concerned is how far the state is necessary or sufficient or even relevant as a constituency of human justice. If answers to this question are considered as forming a continuum, at one end all questions of justice are seen as having meaning only within the state. The state is co-extensive with the special relations and obligations existing between members of a particular society, and as giving unique legal sanction to those relations; or the state is the political expression of national self-determination; or it represents in some other way the rights and interests of its people. At the other end of the continuum, questions of human rights, distributive justice and even self-determination have an independent value irrespective of whether they arise within the state or are considered globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Leo McCarthy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, L. (1998). Justice in International Relations. In: Justice, the State and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379053_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics