Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Military and Strategic History ((SMSH))

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

The two events which were to change the British attitude towards Nasser from one of continuing if rather more suspicious accommodation in the wake of the arms deal, to one of open and unremitting hostility, took place in Jordan. First came the failure of the December 1955 mission of General Sir Gerald Templer, Chief of the Imperial General Staff, to secure Jordanian accession to the Baghdad Pact. Hard on the heels of this humiliation, at the beginning of March 1956, came the sudden dismissal of General Sir John Bagot Glubb, commander of the Jordanian Arab Legion. Both events were bitter blows to British prestige in the Middle East and contributed to a major reorientation of British policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Lucas, W. S., ‘The path to Suez: Britain and the struggle for the Middle East, 1953–56’, in Deighton, A. (ed.) Britain and the First Cold War (London, 1990), pp. 261–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dann, U., King Hussein and the Challenge of Arab Radicalism (Oxford, 1989), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dulles—Macmillan, 5/12/55, FRUS, 1955–57, XIV, p. 821. Scott Lucas indicates that: ‘the US, originally indicated it would not oppose Jordan’s accession but reversed its position when Nasser suggested that Cairo might consider secret talks on a settlement with Israel, provided other Arab states did not join the Baghdad Pact.’ (Lucas, W. S., ‘Neustadt revisited: a new look at Suez and the Anglo-American “alliance"’ in Gorst, A., Johnman, L. and Lucas, W. S. (eds) Post-War Britain, 1945–64: Themes and Perspectives (London, 1989), p. 186.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. In his more recent work, Scott Lucas refers to Macmillan’s telegram of 28/10/55, reporting Dulles’s supposed support for Jordanian accession, but does not explore its possible implications for Macmillan’s and Dulles’s strategy in the Middle East (Lucas, W. S., Divided We Stand: Britain, the US and the Suez Crisis, London, 1991. p. 68).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abidi, A. H. H., Jordan: a Political Study 1948–57 (New York, 1965), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thorpe, D. R., Selwyn Lloyd (London, 1989), pp. 191–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ambrose, S. E., Eisenhower the President (London, 1984), p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dann, King Hussein and the Challenge of Arab Radicalism, p. 32. Heikal, M., Nasser: the Cairo Documents (London, 1972), p. 85, also argues that Nasser was surprised by Glubb’s dismissal, even believing it to have been orchestrated by the British themselves as a sign of good faith.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Nigel John Ashton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashton, N.J. (1996). March 1956 and the Break with Nasser. In: Eisenhower, Macmillan and the Problem of Nasser. Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378971_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378971_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39571-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37897-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics