Abstract
By the end of the conversations, I had come to realise that there is substantially more agreement among Post Keynesians than I had originally believed. This is especially apparent if the views of the economists I interviewed are contrasted with the opinions of mainstream theorists on questions of methodology, on substantive issues in economic theory, and on their implications for policy decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
‘This proposition was commonplace …’: A.W Stonier and D. C. Hague, A Textbook of Economic Theory (London: Longman, 1953), pp. 356–8.
‘forgotten or rejected science …’: J. E King, Economic Exiles (London: Macmillan, 1989), chapter 1.
p. 247 Keynes, General Theory, p. 378.
M. Lavoie, Foundations of Post Keynesian Economic Analysis (Aldershot: Elgar, 1992).
Conversation with R. M. Solow in A. Klamer, Conversations with Economists (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984), pp. 137–8.
King, Economic Exiles, chapters 2 (Steuart), 9 (Andrews) and 11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 J. E. King
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
King, J.E. (1995). Conclusion. In: Conversations with Post Keynesians. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378827_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378827_17
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39157-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37882-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)