Skip to main content

Introduction: 1961

  • Chapter
  • 12 Accesses

Abstract

The first volume of this study of modern British political processes was finished in 1985. My own reformulations since then, together with the requirements of undergraduate teaching and the comments of other historians and political scientists, have inevitably emphasised and sharpened some of its arguments in the intervening four years, so that a brief recapitulation is desirable before setting out to complete the narrative as far as the mid-1980s. But even if it were not so, an introductory chapter on the 1961 context would require some assessment of how perceptions of the 1944 agenda and postwar settlement had changed. What had once been seen as a political contract written in very general but enabling terms, was judged, seventeen years later, to be an inadequate rulebook for what had become the principal contemporary requirements: adjustment to change and economic growth. Wartime reconstructors had, of course, envisaged their agenda in different terms; of survival as a great power in a hostile postwar environment, whilst remedying the greatest evils of the 1930s. Their conception of what was to be done inevitably fell foul of the next generation’s tendency to rewrite the agenda in its own terms and to seek, in the idea of planned growth, a remedy for the failure of politics and of the politicians who preceded them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. This is the theme of Correlli Barnett’s The Audit of War (1986), which rests fundamentally on the assumption that Britain could have been galvanised by a post-war government that had not set itself a ‘New Jerusalem’ of welfare priorities and rising living standards. Such a government, in an open democracy, after the 1945 election result, would have been inconceivable: the argument requires at the least a Bismarkian regime, if not a dictatorship.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christopher Booker, The Neophiliacs (1969);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Theodore Roszak, The Making of a Counter-Culture (1970);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stuart Hall, Resistance Through Rituals (1976). Cf. Stanislav Andreski’s comment: ’sorcery lost, not because of any waning of its intrinsic appeal to the human mind, but because it failed to match the power created by science. But, though abandoned as a tool for controlling nature, incantations remain more effective for manipulating crowds than logical arguments, so that in the conduct of human affairs, sorcery continues to be stronger than science.’ (The Social Sciences as Sorcery, 1972, p. 92)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. Lipset, ‘The changing class structure and contemporary European polities’; R. Dahrendorf, ‘Recent changes in the class structure of European societies’, Daedalus, vol. 93, no. 7 (1964), pp. 271–303 and 225–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. M. Wachtel The Money Mandarins (1986), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taking 1953 as the baseline, British industrial production 1951–60 rose from 98 to 129, by 31%; over the same period, Continental Western Europe from 92 to 172, or 86% (S. Pollard, The Wasting of the British Economy 1945 to the Present, 1982, p. 41).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. A. Brett, The World Economy since the War, The Politics of Uneven Development (1985), pp. 132–3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Pollard, The Wasting of the British Economy; S. Strange, Sterling and British Policy (1971); C. J. Bartlett, The Long Retreat (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Shonfield, British Economic Policy since the War (1959), p. 234;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Radcliffe Report, pp. 265–6. For a later assessment, see R. Caves, Britain’s Economic Prospects (1968), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  12. It could be argued that the British were in some respect wiser: for autonomous growth in all these countries, except Italy, made it possible in the 1960s to lay aside the integration project and compensate the recipients of welfare out of rapid growth, leading in due course to the savage reversals in the mid-1970s that undermined both growth and welfare provision. But British disdain probably derived less from cynical foresight than from insular pride (Cf. Hugo Heclo, ‘Towards a New Welfare State?’, in P. Flora and A. Heidenheimer, The Development of the Welfare State in Europe and America (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hugo Heclo, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden (1974), p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Himmelfarb, The New History and the Old: Critical Essays and Reappraisals (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Keith Middlemas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Middlemas, K. (1990). Introduction: 1961. In: Power, Competition and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378780_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378780_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38846-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37878-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics