Britain: Staff Participation and Modernization under ‘New’ Labour

  • David Farnham
  • Sylvia Horton
  • Geoff White

Abstract

In Britain, public management reform has proceeded uninterrupted under both Conservative and Labour governments since 1979. The Conservatives, in office from 1979 to 1997, introduced major reforms culminating in changes to the size and contours of the state, its managerial processes and practices and the composition and culture of public services. Many writers have described, explained and critiqued these changes (Farnham and Horton 1993, 1996, Ferlie et al. 1996, Flynn 2002, Horton and Farnham 1999, Hughes 2003, Pollitt 1990) but few have sought to examine the role that public servants have played in the reform process or how the reforms have affected their position and influence in the management of public services. This chapter focuses on the modernization programme of the Blair governments since 1997 and examines the role of civil servants and their trade unions in that process. The data on which it is based draw upon primary and secondary written sources, semi-structured, in-depth interviews with Senior Civil Service (SCS) managers from the Cabinet Office and the Treasury, a regional and a local manager from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) and senior civil service trade union officers.1

Keywords

Europe Income Monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bender, K. and Elliott, R. (2003) Decentralised Pay Setting. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Blair, T. (1999) Speech to the Sunningdale Conference, Civil Service College. London.Google Scholar
  3. Cabinet Office (1994) The Civil Service: Continuity and Change. Cm2627, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  4. Cabinet Office (1995) The Civil Service: Taking Forward Continuity and Change. Cm 2748, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  5. Cabinet Office (1998) Towards Best Practice: An Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Public Sector Benchmarking Project 1996–98 ( Samuels Report). London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  6. Cabinet Office (1999a) Modernising Government. Cm 3410, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  7. Cabinet Office (1999b) Civil Service Reform: A Report by Sir Richard Wilson. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  8. Cabinet Office/CCSU (2002) ‘Partnership working in the Civil Service: Internal report of a project group’, London.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Clegg, H. (1976) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain ( 3rd edn ). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Clifford, A. (2000) ‘Civil Service executive agencies and the transformation of Civil Service employee relations’, Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Corby, S. (1994) ‘How big a step is Next Steps? Industrial relations developments in Next Steps executive agencies’, Human Resources Management Journal, 4 (2), 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cully, M., Woodland, S., O’Reilly, A. and Dix, G. (1999) Britain at Work. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farnham, D. (1979) ‘Sixty years of Whitleyism’, Whitley Bulletin, January, 59 (1), 9.Google Scholar
  15. Farnham, D. (2000) Employee Relations in Context. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  16. Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1993) Managing the New Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1996) Managing the New Public Services ( 2nd edn ). Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Farnham, D. and McNeill, J. (1997) ‘Pay delegation in Next Steps agencies: Some initial research findings’, Public Policy and Administration, 12 (4), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farnham, D., Horton, S. and White, G. (2003) ‘Organisational change and staff participation and involvement in Britain’s public services,’ The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16 (6), 434–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farnham, D., Horton, S. and White, G. (2005) ‘New directions in staff consultation and communication in the British civil service and prison service,’ Review of Public Personnel Administration. Vol. 25 (1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. and Pettigrew. A. (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flynn, N. (2002) Public Sector Management ( 3rd edn ). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  23. Horton, S. (1996) ‘The Civil Service’, in D. Farnham and S. Horton (eds), Managing People in the Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Horton, S. (2005) ‘Participation and involvement of senior staff in the reform of the British civil service’, Review of Public Personnel Administration. Vol. 25 (2).Google Scholar
  25. Horton, S. and Farnham, D. (1999) Public Management in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, O. (2003) Public Management and Administration ( 3rd edn ). Basingstoke: Palgrave—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Kessler, I. (1993) ‘Pay determination in the British civil service since 1979’, Public Administration, 71 (3), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Labour Party (1997) New Labour Because Britain Deserves Better. Labour Party Manifesto. London.Google Scholar
  29. Martinez-Lucio, M. and Stuart, M. (2002) ‘Assessing partnership: The prospects for, and challenges to, modernisation’, Employee Relations, 24 (3), 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Office of National Statistics (2003) Civil Service Statistics 2002. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  31. Pollitt, C. (1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Rhodes, R. (1997) ‘Reinventing Whitehall 1979–1995’, in W. Kickert Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Talbot, C. (1997) ‘UK civil service personnel reforms: Devolution, decentralisation and delusion’, Public Policy and Administration, 12 (4), 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© David Farnham, Sylvia Horton and Geoff White 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Farnham
  • Sylvia Horton
  • Geoff White

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations