Abstract
In Britain, public management reform has proceeded uninterrupted under both Conservative and Labour governments since 1979. The Conservatives, in office from 1979 to 1997, introduced major reforms culminating in changes to the size and contours of the state, its managerial processes and practices and the composition and culture of public services. Many writers have described, explained and critiqued these changes (Farnham and Horton 1993, 1996, Ferlie et al. 1996, Flynn 2002, Horton and Farnham 1999, Hughes 2003, Pollitt 1990) but few have sought to examine the role that public servants have played in the reform process or how the reforms have affected their position and influence in the management of public services. This chapter focuses on the modernization programme of the Blair governments since 1997 and examines the role of civil servants and their trade unions in that process. The data on which it is based draw upon primary and secondary written sources, semi-structured, in-depth interviews with Senior Civil Service (SCS) managers from the Cabinet Office and the Treasury, a regional and a local manager from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) and senior civil service trade union officers.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bender, K. and Elliott, R. (2003) Decentralised Pay Setting. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Blair, T. (1999) Speech to the Sunningdale Conference, Civil Service College. London.
Cabinet Office (1994) The Civil Service: Continuity and Change. Cm2627, London: HMSO.
Cabinet Office (1995) The Civil Service: Taking Forward Continuity and Change. Cm 2748, London: HMSO.
Cabinet Office (1998) Towards Best Practice: An Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Public Sector Benchmarking Project 1996–98 ( Samuels Report). London: Cabinet Office.
Cabinet Office (1999a) Modernising Government. Cm 3410, London: Stationery Office.
Cabinet Office (1999b) Civil Service Reform: A Report by Sir Richard Wilson. London: Stationery Office.
Cabinet Office/CCSU (2002) ‘Partnership working in the Civil Service: Internal report of a project group’, London.
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State. London: Sage.
Clegg, H. (1976) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain ( 3rd edn ). Oxford: Blackwell.
Clifford, A. (2000) ‘Civil Service executive agencies and the transformation of Civil Service employee relations’, Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Oxford.
Corby, S. (1994) ‘How big a step is Next Steps? Industrial relations developments in Next Steps executive agencies’, Human Resources Management Journal, 4 (2), 52–69.
Cully, M., Woodland, S., O’Reilly, A. and Dix, G. (1999) Britain at Work. London: Routledge.
Farnham, D. (1979) ‘Sixty years of Whitleyism’, Whitley Bulletin, January, 59 (1), 9.
Farnham, D. (2000) Employee Relations in Context. London: CIPD.
Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1993) Managing the New Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave-Macmillan.
Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1996) Managing the New Public Services ( 2nd edn ). Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave-Macmillan.
Farnham, D. and McNeill, J. (1997) ‘Pay delegation in Next Steps agencies: Some initial research findings’, Public Policy and Administration, 12 (4), 35–46.
Farnham, D., Horton, S. and White, G. (2003) ‘Organisational change and staff participation and involvement in Britain’s public services,’ The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16 (6), 434–45.
Farnham, D., Horton, S. and White, G. (2005) ‘New directions in staff consultation and communication in the British civil service and prison service,’ Review of Public Personnel Administration. Vol. 25 (1), 1–13.
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. and Pettigrew. A. (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flynn, N. (2002) Public Sector Management ( 3rd edn ). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Horton, S. (1996) ‘The Civil Service’, in D. Farnham and S. Horton (eds), Managing People in the Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.
Horton, S. (2005) ‘Participation and involvement of senior staff in the reform of the British civil service’, Review of Public Personnel Administration. Vol. 25 (2).
Horton, S. and Farnham, D. (1999) Public Management in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, O. (2003) Public Management and Administration ( 3rd edn ). Basingstoke: Palgrave—now Palgrave Macmillan.
Kessler, I. (1993) ‘Pay determination in the British civil service since 1979’, Public Administration, 71 (3), 1–31.
Labour Party (1997) New Labour Because Britain Deserves Better. Labour Party Manifesto. London.
Martinez-Lucio, M. and Stuart, M. (2002) ‘Assessing partnership: The prospects for, and challenges to, modernisation’, Employee Relations, 24 (3), 305–20.
Office of National Statistics (2003) Civil Service Statistics 2002. London: HMSO.
Pollitt, C. (1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rhodes, R. (1997) ‘Reinventing Whitehall 1979–1995’, in W. Kickert Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Talbot, C. (1997) ‘UK civil service personnel reforms: Devolution, decentralisation and delusion’, Public Policy and Administration, 12 (4), 14–34.
Copyright information
© 2005 David Farnham, Sylvia Horton and Geoff White
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farnham, D., Horton, S., White, G. (2005). Britain: Staff Participation and Modernization under ‘New’ Labour. In: Staff Participation and Public Management Reform. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378612_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378612_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51768-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37861-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)