Trajectories, Institutions and Stakeholders in Public Management Reform

  • David Farnham
  • Annie Hondeghem
  • Sylvia Horton


Not all countries have embarked upon root-and-branch reforms of their political and administrative systems, despite some convergence among them, although the environmental forces and trends facing them are similar. The aim of this chapter is to explore the reasons for this, arguing that the actions of governments are path dependent and context specific. Superficial similarities and a common rhetoric often conceal very different actions and responses to common problems (Pollitt 2002). So despite a great deal of mimetic isomorphism, there is a lot of variance ‘in how political systems have interpreted the ideas and responded to the demands or opportunities for introducing administrative change’ (Peters 1997: 227). In line with a neo-institutionalist approach, this chapter stresses the impact of institutions as well as the role of actors in public management reforms. Institutions have a shaping, facilitating or constraining effect on reforms, which are the result of actions taken by individuals or groups and their responses to the pressures acting upon them.


Trade Union Civil Servant Collective Bargaining Stakeholder Theory Administrative System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ascher, K. (1987) The Politics of Privatisation, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aucoin, P. (1990) ‘Administrative reform in public management: Paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums’, Governance, 3 (2), 115–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon, R. and Eltis, W. (1976) Britain’s Economic Problem. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Barzelay, M. (1992) Breaking through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, H. (1983) Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brewster, C., Demsey, M. and Hegewisch, A. (2001) ‘The union’s response to change in the public sector’, in B. Nolan (ed.), Public Management Reform. An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Cassese, S. (ed.) (1986) The European Administration. Paris/Maastricht: International Institute of Administrative Sciences/European Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, T. and Lagreid, P. (eds) (2001) New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practices. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, T. and Lagreid, P. (2002) ‘New public management—puzzles of democracy and the influence of citizens’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10 (3), 267–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunphy, D. and Stace, D. (1992) Under New Management: Australian Organisations in Transition. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1993) Managing the New Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farnham, D., Horton, S., Barlow, J. and Hondeghem, A. (eds) (1996) The New Public Managers in Europe: Public Servants in Transition. Basingstoke: Macmillan—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. and Pettigrew, A. (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  15. Halligan, J. (2001a) ‘Comparing public management reform in the OECD’, in B. Nolan (ed), Public Management Reform. New York: Palgrave—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Halligan, J. (2001b) The process of reform in the era of public sector transformation’, in T. Christensen and P. Lagreid (eds), New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practices. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Hölscher, J. and Whitaker, M. (2004) The Quality of Industrial Relations in the European Public Sector. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  18. Hondeghem, A. (2000) ‘The national civil service in Belgium’, in H. Bekke and F. Van der Meer (eds), Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Hood, C. (1995) ‘Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm?’, Public Policy and Administration, 10 (2), 104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jawahar, I. and McLaughlin, G. (2001) ‘Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach’, Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), 397–414.Google Scholar
  21. Kanter, R. M. (1983) The Change Masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Kickert, W. (1997) ‘Public management in the United States and Europe’, in W. Kickert (ed.), Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. (2000) ‘Politicians and interactive decision making: Institutional spoilsports or playmaker?’, Public Administration, 78, 365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krasner, S. (1984) ‘Approaches to the state. Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics’, Comparative Politics, 16, 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krasner, S. (1988) ‘Sovereignity. An institutional perspective’, Comparative Polticial Studies, 21 (1), 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lapsey, I. and Oldfield, R. (2001) ‘Transforming the public sector: Management consultants as agents of change’, The European Accounting Review, 10 (3), 523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmbruch, G. and Schmitter, P. (1979) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Löffler, E. (1997) The Modernisation of the Public Sector in an International Comparative Perspective. Speyer: Forschungsinstitut für Offentliche Verwaltung.Google Scholar
  29. Lynn, L. E. Jr (1997) ‘The new public management as an international phenomenon. A sceptical view’, Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 105–22.Google Scholar
  30. March, J. and Olsen, J. (1984) ‘The new institutionalism. Organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review, 78, 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell, R., Agle, B. and Wood, D. (1997) ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 853–86.Google Scholar
  32. Nolan, B. (ed.) (2001) Public Management Reform. An International Perspective. New York: Palgrave—now Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Peters, B. G. (1996) The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  35. Peters, B. G. (1997) ‘A North American perspective on administrative modernization in Europe’, in W. Kickert (ed.), Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Peters, G. and Pierre, J. (eds) (2001) Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Peters, T. and Waterman, T. (1982) In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  38. Philips, R., Freeman, R. E. and Wicks, A. C. (2003) ‘What stakeholder theory is not’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (4), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pollitt, C. (2002) ‘Clarifying convergence: Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform’, Public Management Reform, 4 (1), 471–92.Google Scholar
  40. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2000) Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Putseys, L. and Hondeghem, A. (2003) Contracten met leidende ambtenaren. Internationaal vergelijkend onderzoek naar de contractualisering van de sturings- en arbeidsrelatie. Brugge: Die Keure.Google Scholar
  43. Roness, P. G. (2002) ‘Transforming state employees unions’, in T. Christensen and P. Lagreid (eds), New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Saint-Martin, D. (1998) ‘The new managerialism and the policy of consultants in government: An historical-institutionalist analysis of Britain, Canada and France’, Governance, 11 (3), 319–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scott, W. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations ( 2nd edn ). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Steen, T. (2001) Gemeenten in verandering. De sturing en implementatie van de krachtlijnen voor een nieuw personeelsbeleid. Brugge: Die Keure.Google Scholar
  47. Tanquerel, T. (2004) La contractualisation des rapports de service du personnel federal en Suisse: Revolution ou trompe-l’oeil?. EGPA Conference, 1–3 September, Ljubljana/ Slovenia.Google Scholar
  48. Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. (1995) ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds), Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Vandenabeele, W. and Hondeghem, A. (2004) Measuring HRM in a Decentralized Environment — Case Study United States. Leuven: SBOV.Google Scholar
  50. van Dooren, W., Thijs, N. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) ‘Quality management and the management of quality in European public administrations’, in E. Löffler and M. Vintar (eds), Improving the Quality of East and West European Public Services. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  51. Van Reeth, W. (2002) The Bearable Lightness of Budgeting. An Explorative Research on the Uneven Implementation of Performance Oriented Budget Reform. Leuven: KUL.Google Scholar
  52. Williamson, P. (1989) Corporatism in Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Wright, V. (1994) ‘Reshaping the state: The implications for public administration’, West European Politics, 17 (3), 102–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ziller, J. (2003) ‘The continental system of administrative legality’, in B. G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Farnham, Annie Hondeghem and Sylvia Horton 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Farnham
    • 1
    • 2
  • Annie Hondeghem
    • 3
  • Sylvia Horton
    • 4
  1. 1.University of PortsmouthEngland
  2. 2.Universities of Greenwich and East LondonEngland
  3. 3.Public Management InstituteCatholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.School of Social, Historical and Literary StudiesUniversity of PortsmouthEngland

Personalised recommendations