Skip to main content

The Netherlands: Modernization, Participation and Strategic Choice

  • Chapter
Staff Participation and Public Management Reform

Abstract

Public management reform has been on the agenda in the Netherlands since the early 1980s. According to Kickert (2000) ‘autonomizing’ of public sector organizations is the key word to describe the changes in the Dutch public sector. This autonomization, though, has taken different shapes over time. In the early 1980s ‘privatization’ was the main trend. During the period 1989 to 2002, when there were coalition governments in which the Social Democrats participated, privatization was a less-favoured reform option. Other forms of autonomization were introduced, especially ‘self-management’ since the mid 1980s (involving a management contract between departmental leadership and the management of agencies), ‘quangos’1 in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, and ‘new regime agencies’ in the mid 1990s. The main element of the latter is the idea that politics should not interfere with day-to-day organizational practice so that agencies can concentrate on their main executive tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becking, K. M. (2001) ‘Grand Design’. Een onderzoek naar processen van normalisering en decentralisering in de arbeidsverhoudingen voor overheidspersoneel in de periode 1990–2000. Den Haag: CAOP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, M. (2003) ‘De concerngedachte slaat aan’, PW, 27 September, 22–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. A. P., ’t Hart, P., van Twist, M. J. W. and Rosenthal, U. (2001) Openbaar Bestuur. Beleid, Organisatie en Politiek. Alphen a/d Rijn: Samson HD Tjeenk Willink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingemans, R. P. B. A. (2000) Overheidspersoneel: formatiebeleid, arbeidsmarktbeleid en personeelsontwikkeling en mobiliteit. ’s Gravenhage: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken/Rijksarchiefdienst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondeghem, A. and Putseys, L. (2003) ‘Topambtenaren in België en Nederland’, Bestuurskunde, 12 (3), 106–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskamp, R. (2003) Arbeidsrelaties en Onderneming. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBO (2001) Rijk met personeel. Naar een effectiever personeelsmanagement Rijksdienst. ’s Gravenhage: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. (2000) Public Management Reform in the Netherlands. Social Reconstruction of Reform Ideas and Underlying Frames of Reference. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A., McKersie, R. B. and Cappelli, P. (1984) ‘Strategic choice and industrial relations theory’, Industrial Relations, 23 (1), 16–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2001) De arbeidsmarkt in de collectieve sector. Investeren in mensen en kwaliteit. ’s Gravenhage: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2004) Actieprogramma ‘Andere Overheid’. s’Gravenhage: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, C., van der Meer, M. and Visser, J. (2003) Public Sector Industrial Relations in the Netherlands: Framework, Principles, Players and Representativity. Amsterdam: AIAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peijpe, T. van. (1998) Schets van het Nederlands Ambtenarenrecht. Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2000) Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M., Lansbury, R. and Wailes, N. (2001) Participation and industrial democracy: A theoretical perspective’, in R. Markey, R. Belzer, B. Lunting, G. Muller, J. Rihhagen, L. Sprengers and E. Verhulh (eds), Models of Employee Participation in a Changing Global Environment. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steijn, B. (2003a) ‘De rol van het management bij arbeidssatisfactie en mobiliteit’, in Ministerie van BZK Personeelsen Mobiliteitsonderzoek Overheidspersoneel 1999–2002. s’-Gravenhage: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steijn, B. (2003b) ‘HRM, arbeidssatisfactie en de publieke sector’, Bestuurswetenschappen, 57 (4), 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lammeren, B. (2003) ‘OR’en ministeries roepen rechter te hulp tegen kabinet’, OR-Informatie, 14, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel, S. and van Buuren, M. W. (2001) ‘Ontwikkeling van het aantal zelfstandige bestuursorganen tussen 1993 en 2000: zijn zbo’s ‘uit’ de mode?’ Bestuurswetenschappen, 55 (5), 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulp, E. (2002) ‘Inleiding’, in R. M. Beltzer et al. Inleiding Nederlands Ambtenarenrecht. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Peter Leisink and Bram Steijn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leisink, P., Steijn, B. (2005). The Netherlands: Modernization, Participation and Strategic Choice. In: Staff Participation and Public Management Reform. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378612_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics