Peasant and Labour Opposition to the Colonial and Post-colonial State



The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the relative potential for revolutionary action against the colonial and post-colonial state to be found among the peasantry and labour during the period of the nationalist movements in Malaya and Indonesia.


Mass Movement Labour Movement Colonial State United Malay National Organization Money Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Karl Marx, The Class Struggle in France, 1848–1850, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1972 p. 112Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedrich Engels, The Peasant War in Germany, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, p. 10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party, Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1965, p. 42.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. I. Lenin, ‘The Development of Capitalism in Russia,’ in idem., Collected Works, Vol. 3, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1972, p. 33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mao Tse-Tung, ‘Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan,’ in Mao, Selected Works, Vol. 1, Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1967, p. 24.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mao Tse-Tung, ‘A Report of the Front Committee to the Central Committee of the Party,’ in Stuart Schram, The Political Thought of Mao Tse-Tung, New York: Praeger, 1976, p. 259.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For an account of the views of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Mao on the peasantry see Anne E. Lucas-Rouffignas, The Contemporary Peasantry in Mexico: A Class Analysis, New York: Praeger, 1985, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barrington Moore, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamza Alavi, ‘Peasants and Revolution,’ The Socialist Register, London: Merlin, 1965, pp. 241–77: p. 244.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    James C. Scott, ‘Hegemony and the Peasantry,’ Politics and Society 7, 3, 1977, 267–96: p. 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 13.
    Eric R. Wolf, Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century, New York: Harper & Row, 1969, p. 290.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Theda Skocpol, ‘What Makes Peasants Revolutionary,’ Comparative Politics 14, 3, 1982, 351–75: p. 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 17.
    Jeffery M. Paige, Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture In the Underdeveloped World, New York: The Free Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. 40.
    Shahril Talib, After Its Own Image: The Trengganu Experience, 1881–1941, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1984. According to Kershaw, however, ‘the idea of the 1928 revolt as a would-be precursor of peasant liberation movements begins to feel a little brittle’, citing lack of evidence and other points as reasons.Google Scholar
  15. See Roger Kershaw, ‘Difficult Synthesis: Recent Trends in Malay Political Sociology and History’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 16, 1, 1988, 134–58: p. 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 41.
    Tan Ban Teik, ‘The Tok Janggut Rebellion of 1915 in Kelantan: A Reinterpretation,’ in Cheah Boon Kheng, ed., Tokoh-tokoh Tempatan, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia, 1982, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
  17. 42.
    For case studies see Sartono Kartodirdjo, Protest Movements in Rural Java: A Study of Agrarian Unrest in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries, Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. 43.
    Virginia Thompson, Labour Problems in Southeast Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1947, p. 103.Google Scholar
  19. 46.
    Ibid., p. 105. See also J. Norman Parmer, ‘Chinese Estate Workers’ Strikes in Malaya in March 1937,’ in C. D. Cowan, ed., The Economic Development of Southeast Asia: Studies in Economic History and Political Economy, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1964, pp. 154–73.Google Scholar
  20. 48.
    Kamaruddin M. Said, ‘Mogok dan Konflik lndustri di Malaysia: Suatu Pembicaraan Awal,’ Jurnal Antropologi dan Sosiologi 7, 1979, 75–108: p. 95.Google Scholar
  21. 50.
    Lucian Pye, Guerilla Communism in Malaya: Its Social and Political Meaning, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  22. 55.
    George M. Kahin, Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952, p. 86.Google Scholar
  23. See J. Th. Blumberger, De Communistische Beweging in Nederlandsch-Indie, Haarlem: Tjeen Willink, 1935,Google Scholar
  24. and Shelton Stromquist, ‘The Communist Uprisings of 1926–1927 in Indonesia: A Re-Interpretation’, Journal of Southeast Asian History 8, 2, 1967, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 56.
    For more on union activities see J. Ingleson, In Search of Justice: Workers and Unions in Colonial Java, Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  26. 58.
    Theda Skocpol, States and Social Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  27. 72.
    B. Gunawan, ‘Political Mobilization in Indonesia: Nationalists Against Communists’, Modern Asian Studies 7, 4, 1973, 707–15: pp. 709–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 77.
    Michael Adas, ‘From Avoidance to Confrontation: Peasant Protest in Precolonial and Colonial Southeast Asia,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, 2, 1981, 217–47: p. 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. See also James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986;Google Scholar
  30. James C. Scott & Benedict J. Tria Kerkvliet, eds, Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance in Southeast Asia, London: Frank Cass, 1986.Google Scholar
  31. 78.
    Mohd. Noordin Sopiee, ‘The Penang Secession Movement, 1948–1951’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 4, 1, 1973, 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 79.
    Chandran Jeshurun, ‘Government Responses to Armed Insurgency in Malaysia, 1957–82,’ in idem, ed., Governments and Rebellions in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1985, pp. 134–65: p. 136.Google Scholar
  33. 81.
    For example, the Samin and Samat movements in Java. See The Siauw Giap, ‘The Samin Movement in Java: Complementary Remarks’, Revue du Sud-est Asiatique 1, 1961, 63–78; The, ‘The Samin and Samat Movements in Java: Two examples of Peasant Resistance’, Revue du Sud-est Asiatique 1, 1968, 107–14.Google Scholar
  34. 82.
    Justus M. van der Kroef, ‘Separatist Movements in Indonesia’, Southeast Asian Spectrum 4, 4, 1976, 9–19;Google Scholar
  35. S. Soebadi, ‘Kartosuwiryo and the Darul Islam Rebellion in Indonesia’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 14, 1, 1983, 109–33;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R. J. May, ‘Ethnic Separatism in Southeast Asia’, Pacific Viewpoint 31, 2, 1990, 28–9: pp. 28–43;Google Scholar
  37. Bilveer Singh, East Timor, Indonesia and the World: Myths and Realities, Singapore: Singapore Institute of International Affairs, 1995.Google Scholar
  38. 91.
    Clifford Geertz, Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia, Berkeley, Los Angeles, & London: University of California Press, 1963, p. 89.Google Scholar
  39. 93.
    J. H. Boeke, Structure of the Netherlands Indian Economy, New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1942, p. 26.Google Scholar
  40. 94.
    Benjamin White, ‘“Agricultural Involution” and its Critics: Twenty Years After Clifford Geertz’, Institute of Social Studies Working Paper Series 6, The Hague: Institute of Social Studies, 1983; Joel S. Kahn, ‘Indonesia After the Demise of Involution: Critique of a Debate’, Critique of Anthropology 5, 1, 1985, 69–96;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Alec Gordon, ‘Economic History versus “Agricultural Involution”: Towards a Usable Past for Southeast Asia’, in Peter Limqueco, ed., Partisan Scholarship: Essays in Honour of Renato Constantino, Manila & Wollongong: JCA Publishers, 1989, pp. 131–51;Google Scholar
  42. G. R. Knight, ‘Capitalism and Commodity production in Java’, in Hamza Alavi, P. L. Burns, G. R. Knight, P. B. Mayer, and Doug McEachern, Capitalism and Colonial Production, London & Sydney: Croom Helm, 1982, pp. 119–58.Google Scholar
  43. 97.
    Svein Aas, ‘The Relevance of Chayanov’s Macro Theory to the Case of Java’, in E. J. Hobsbawm et al., eds, Peasants in History: Essays in Honour of Daniel Thorner, Calcutta: Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 221–48: p. 238.Google Scholar
  44. 98.
    R. E. Elson, ‘Sugard Factory Workers and the Emergence of “Free Labour” in Nineteenth-Century Java’, Modern Asian Studies 20, 1, 1986, 139–74: p. 145. See also Elson, ‘The Cultivation System and Agricultural Involution’, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies Working Papers No. 14, Melbourne: Monash University, p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 102.
    Jennifer Alexander & Paul Alexander, ‘Shared Poverty as Ideology: Agrarian Relationships in Colonial Java’, Man 17, 1982, 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 103.
    Jeff Kingston, ‘Agricultural Involution Among Lampung’s Javanese?’, Southeast Asian Studies 27, 4, 1990, 485–507.Google Scholar
  47. 105.
    Ravindra K. Jain, South Indians on the Plantation Frontier in Malaya, New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1970, p. 295.Google Scholar
  48. 108.
    Clifford Geertz, The Social History of an Indonesian Town, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965, pp. 127ff.Google Scholar
  49. 109.
    W. F. Wertheim, ‘From Aliran Toward Class Struggle in the Countryside of Java,’ Pacific Viewpoint 10, 2, 1969, 1–17.Google Scholar
  50. 113.
    Martin Rudner, ‘Malayan Labor in Transition: Labor Policy and Trade Unionism, 1955–1963’, Modern Asian Studies 7, 1, 1973, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 114.
    James C. Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1976, pp. 57–8.Google Scholar
  52. 117.
    Martin J. Murray, The Development of Capitalism in Indochina (1870–1940), Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press, 1980, p. 272.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Syed Farid Alatas 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations