Skip to main content

Peasant and Labour Opposition to the Colonial and Post-colonial State

  • Chapter
Democracy and Authoritarianism in Indonesia and Malaysia
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the relative potential for revolutionary action against the colonial and post-colonial state to be found among the peasantry and labour during the period of the nationalist movements in Malaya and Indonesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Karl Marx, The Class Struggle in France, 1848–1850, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1972 p. 112

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedrich Engels, The Peasant War in Germany, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party, Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1965, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Lenin, ‘The Development of Capitalism in Russia,’ in idem., Collected Works, Vol. 3, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1972, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mao Tse-Tung, ‘Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan,’ in Mao, Selected Works, Vol. 1, Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1967, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mao Tse-Tung, ‘A Report of the Front Committee to the Central Committee of the Party,’ in Stuart Schram, The Political Thought of Mao Tse-Tung, New York: Praeger, 1976, p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For an account of the views of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Mao on the peasantry see Anne E. Lucas-Rouffignas, The Contemporary Peasantry in Mexico: A Class Analysis, New York: Praeger, 1985, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barrington Moore, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamza Alavi, ‘Peasants and Revolution,’ The Socialist Register, London: Merlin, 1965, pp. 241–77: p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James C. Scott, ‘Hegemony and the Peasantry,’ Politics and Society 7, 3, 1977, 267–96: p. 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eric R. Wolf, Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century, New York: Harper & Row, 1969, p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Theda Skocpol, ‘What Makes Peasants Revolutionary,’ Comparative Politics 14, 3, 1982, 351–75: p. 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffery M. Paige, Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture In the Underdeveloped World, New York: The Free Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shahril Talib, After Its Own Image: The Trengganu Experience, 1881–1941, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1984. According to Kershaw, however, ‘the idea of the 1928 revolt as a would-be precursor of peasant liberation movements begins to feel a little brittle’, citing lack of evidence and other points as reasons.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Roger Kershaw, ‘Difficult Synthesis: Recent Trends in Malay Political Sociology and History’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 16, 1, 1988, 134–58: p. 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan Ban Teik, ‘The Tok Janggut Rebellion of 1915 in Kelantan: A Reinterpretation,’ in Cheah Boon Kheng, ed., Tokoh-tokoh Tempatan, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia, 1982, pp. 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For case studies see Sartono Kartodirdjo, Protest Movements in Rural Java: A Study of Agrarian Unrest in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries, Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Virginia Thompson, Labour Problems in Southeast Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1947, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 105. See also J. Norman Parmer, ‘Chinese Estate Workers’ Strikes in Malaya in March 1937,’ in C. D. Cowan, ed., The Economic Development of Southeast Asia: Studies in Economic History and Political Economy, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1964, pp. 154–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kamaruddin M. Said, ‘Mogok dan Konflik lndustri di Malaysia: Suatu Pembicaraan Awal,’ Jurnal Antropologi dan Sosiologi 7, 1979, 75–108: p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lucian Pye, Guerilla Communism in Malaya: Its Social and Political Meaning, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  22. George M. Kahin, Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See J. Th. Blumberger, De Communistische Beweging in Nederlandsch-Indie, Haarlem: Tjeen Willink, 1935,

    Google Scholar 

  24. and Shelton Stromquist, ‘The Communist Uprisings of 1926–1927 in Indonesia: A Re-Interpretation’, Journal of Southeast Asian History 8, 2, 1967, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. For more on union activities see J. Ingleson, In Search of Justice: Workers and Unions in Colonial Java, Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Theda Skocpol, States and Social Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Gunawan, ‘Political Mobilization in Indonesia: Nationalists Against Communists’, Modern Asian Studies 7, 4, 1973, 707–15: pp. 709–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Michael Adas, ‘From Avoidance to Confrontation: Peasant Protest in Precolonial and Colonial Southeast Asia,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, 2, 1981, 217–47: p. 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. See also James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986;

    Google Scholar 

  30. James C. Scott & Benedict J. Tria Kerkvliet, eds, Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance in Southeast Asia, London: Frank Cass, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohd. Noordin Sopiee, ‘The Penang Secession Movement, 1948–1951’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 4, 1, 1973, 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chandran Jeshurun, ‘Government Responses to Armed Insurgency in Malaysia, 1957–82,’ in idem, ed., Governments and Rebellions in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1985, pp. 134–65: p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  33. For example, the Samin and Samat movements in Java. See The Siauw Giap, ‘The Samin Movement in Java: Complementary Remarks’, Revue du Sud-est Asiatique 1, 1961, 63–78; The, ‘The Samin and Samat Movements in Java: Two examples of Peasant Resistance’, Revue du Sud-est Asiatique 1, 1968, 107–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Justus M. van der Kroef, ‘Separatist Movements in Indonesia’, Southeast Asian Spectrum 4, 4, 1976, 9–19;

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Soebadi, ‘Kartosuwiryo and the Darul Islam Rebellion in Indonesia’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 14, 1, 1983, 109–33;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. R. J. May, ‘Ethnic Separatism in Southeast Asia’, Pacific Viewpoint 31, 2, 1990, 28–9: pp. 28–43;

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bilveer Singh, East Timor, Indonesia and the World: Myths and Realities, Singapore: Singapore Institute of International Affairs, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clifford Geertz, Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia, Berkeley, Los Angeles, & London: University of California Press, 1963, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. H. Boeke, Structure of the Netherlands Indian Economy, New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1942, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Benjamin White, ‘“Agricultural Involution” and its Critics: Twenty Years After Clifford Geertz’, Institute of Social Studies Working Paper Series 6, The Hague: Institute of Social Studies, 1983; Joel S. Kahn, ‘Indonesia After the Demise of Involution: Critique of a Debate’, Critique of Anthropology 5, 1, 1985, 69–96;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Alec Gordon, ‘Economic History versus “Agricultural Involution”: Towards a Usable Past for Southeast Asia’, in Peter Limqueco, ed., Partisan Scholarship: Essays in Honour of Renato Constantino, Manila & Wollongong: JCA Publishers, 1989, pp. 131–51;

    Google Scholar 

  42. G. R. Knight, ‘Capitalism and Commodity production in Java’, in Hamza Alavi, P. L. Burns, G. R. Knight, P. B. Mayer, and Doug McEachern, Capitalism and Colonial Production, London & Sydney: Croom Helm, 1982, pp. 119–58.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Svein Aas, ‘The Relevance of Chayanov’s Macro Theory to the Case of Java’, in E. J. Hobsbawm et al., eds, Peasants in History: Essays in Honour of Daniel Thorner, Calcutta: Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 221–48: p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. E. Elson, ‘Sugard Factory Workers and the Emergence of “Free Labour” in Nineteenth-Century Java’, Modern Asian Studies 20, 1, 1986, 139–74: p. 145. See also Elson, ‘The Cultivation System and Agricultural Involution’, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies Working Papers No. 14, Melbourne: Monash University, p. 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jennifer Alexander & Paul Alexander, ‘Shared Poverty as Ideology: Agrarian Relationships in Colonial Java’, Man 17, 1982, 597–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jeff Kingston, ‘Agricultural Involution Among Lampung’s Javanese?’, Southeast Asian Studies 27, 4, 1990, 485–507.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ravindra K. Jain, South Indians on the Plantation Frontier in Malaya, New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1970, p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Clifford Geertz, The Social History of an Indonesian Town, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965, pp. 127ff.

    Google Scholar 

  49. W. F. Wertheim, ‘From Aliran Toward Class Struggle in the Countryside of Java,’ Pacific Viewpoint 10, 2, 1969, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Martin Rudner, ‘Malayan Labor in Transition: Labor Policy and Trade Unionism, 1955–1963’, Modern Asian Studies 7, 1, 1973, 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. James C. Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1976, pp. 57–8.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Martin J. Murray, The Development of Capitalism in Indochina (1870–1940), Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press, 1980, p. 272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Syed Farid Alatas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alatas, S.F. (1997). Peasant and Labour Opposition to the Colonial and Post-colonial State. In: Democracy and Authoritarianism in Indonesia and Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378544_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics