Skip to main content

‘Catch-up’ Capabilities Compared

  • Chapter
China’s Rise, Russia’s Fall
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

The limited discussion of the comparative performance of China and the USSR under reform1 has mostly assumed that the reason for the dramatic contrast in outcome can be explained mainly by the radically different starting points, with large differences in their respective capacities for ‘catching up, forging ahead and falling behind’, to use the terminology of Abramowitz (1986). The role of policy choice in politics and economics is given low explanatory weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Peter Nolan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nolan, P. (1995). ‘Catch-up’ Capabilities Compared. In: China’s Rise, Russia’s Fall. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378360_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics