Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Euro-Asian Studies ((EAS))

  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

No later than 1999, an IMF-sponsored publication was still providing an example of pink glass assessment of privatisation in transition countries when it stated that, at the pace of privatisation seen since 1989, it will be almost complete for most of these countries in another decade, and twenty years for such a large task will be judged to have been very quick indeed (Havrylyshyn and McGettigan, 1999). Then the authors concluded that the most important lesson after a decade of transition in the former centrally planned economies to market-oriented systems is that private sector development can surely be rated a success. Optimism and hope stay in the background of these statements, although it is remark-able that an institution, which ten years ago advocated overnight privatisation, now considers that twenty years is a rather short time for such a process. It is also new that the same article admits some prominent failures in the recent privatisation story and stresses that the general market environment is much more important than the method of privatisation. In other words, the time has come for a renewed evaluation of privatisation in transition countries, and one aim of this book is to bring a significant building block to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aukutsionek S., I. Filatochev, R. Kapelyushnikov and V. Zhukov (1998), ‘Dominant Shareholders, Restructuring and Performance of Privatised Companies in Russia: An Analysis and Some Policy Implications’, Communist Economies & Economic Transformation, 10(4), 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrylyshyn O. and D. McGettigan (1999), ‘Privatization in Transition Countries. Lessons of the First Decade’, IMF Economic Issues, 18, August, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikeri S., J. Nellis and M. Shirley (1992), Privatization: The Lessons of Experience (Washington DC: World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E. and C. Xu (2001), ‘Soft Budget Constraint Theories’, Economics of Transition 9(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson W.L. and J.M. Netter (2001), ‘From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization’, Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 321–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nellis J. and S. Kikeri (1989), ‘Public Enterprise Reform: Privatization and the World Bank’, World Development, 17, 659–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti E.C. and S. Gelfer (1999), ‘Red Barons or Robber Barons? Governance and Financing in Russian FIG’, CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 2204, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002), Transition — The First Ten Years: Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (Washington, DC: World Bank, January).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalyuzhnova, Y., Andreff, W. (2003). Introduction. In: Kalyuzhnova, Y., Andreff, W. (eds) Privatisation and Structural Change in Transition Economies. Euro-Asian Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378339_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics