Skip to main content
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

The solution of the problem of ideology is rational political philosophy, which can avoid the problem of relativism by giving an objective justification of political values and making an objective distinction between proper and improper values. The nature of rational political philosophy, or moral political science, as it might also properly be termed, is the concern of this final chapter. Rational political philosophy, as a normative discipline, is the study of objective moral and political reality. Chapter 5 considered Roy Bhaskar’s scientific realism, which holds that there is a scientific reality which is both independent of and accessible to human thought. This stress on objective reality is to be welcomed as an antidote to the relativism of both the post-positivist natural science of Popper, Lakatos, Kuhn and Feyerabend, and the interpretivist social science of Winch and Taylor. However, Bhaskar’s normative thought is not adequate. I now propose to argue for a more adequate moral and political realism, as the only antidote to the problem of moral relativism, which is the problem of political ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. C.B. Macpherson, ‘Hobbes’s Bourgeois Man’, in K Brown (ed.), Hobbes Studies (Oxford, Blackwell, 1965), pp. 170 and 180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Doyal and I. Gough, A Theory of Human Need (London, Macmillan, 1991), chapter 2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. C.B. Macpherson, The Rise and Fall of Economic Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 55–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1973), p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.B. Macpherson, ‘Needs and Wants: An Ontological or Historical Problem?’, in. R. Fitzgerald (ed.), Human Needs and Politics (Rushcutters Bay, NSW, Pergamon, 1977), p. 34 (Macpherson’s emphasis).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Grisez, ‘The Structures of Practical Reason’, The Thomist, 1988, vol. 52, pp. 278–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Mclnerny, ‘Ethics’, in N. Kretzman and E. Stump (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Mclnerny, Ethica Thomistica (Washington, DC, The Catholic University of America Press, 1982), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Veatch, ‘Natural Law and the “Is”—“Ought” Question’, The Catholic Lawyer 1981, vol. 26, pp. 251 and 258.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Bourke, ‘Natural Law, Thomism—And Professor Nielsen’, Natural Law Forum, vol. 5, 1960, p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hittinger, ‘Varieties of Minimalist Natural law Theory’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 1989, vol. 34, p. 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Beiner, Political Judgement (London, Methuen, 1983), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 David Morrice

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morrice, D. (1996). Rational Political Philosophy. In: Philosophy, Science and Ideology in Political Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378223_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics