Abstract
There are good reasons why social institutions, including the labour market, adopt specific forms and characteristics. The development of the Japanese labour market is a case in point and provides an interesting example of the formation and reformation of a social institution. This social institution was not entirely new to Japan in the year 1868 and in the process of development two types of transaction mechanism – ‘internal’ and ‘external’ labour markets – counteracted each other, with the balance of dominance shifting from one to the other. I shall illustrate this point with an example from the history of the machinery industry in Japan.
At the 33rd Biwako Conference, I delivered my comments on each of the papers presented. I have omitted these comments from this chapter, as the papers subsequenthy underwent several revisions and so reproducing my original remarks would be meaningless. Editorial assistance rendered by Mr Andrew Hunt is gratefully acknowledged.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsEditor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Odaka, K. (1998). A Historical Note: Does History Matter?. In: Ohashi, I., Tachibanaki, T. (eds) Internal Labour Markets, Incentives and Employment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377974_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377974_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39848-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37797-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)