Abstract
If we were to remain on the level of ‘party politics’, we should discuss the process whereby the Conservative Party came to regard itself during the Seventies as the party of ‘law and order’. But ‘law and order’ is simply the business of government, and no political party which spoke or acted as though it were not concerned to uphold them could ever be elected — as the Labour Party discovered to its cost. The truth was given by Machiavelli, in one sharp sentence which everybody recognizes to be true the moment he feels the reluctance to believe it: ‘The Prince must use first law, which is natural to man, but must be prepared to use violence, which is bestial, in order that the rule of law be maintained.’ The issues that will concern us are those of the nature of law, its scope, and its ‘image’ in conservative thinking. The rest is a matter of tactics. Theoretically speaking ‘law and order’ can be left to look after itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2001 Roger Scruton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scruton, R. (2001). Law and Liberty. In: The Meaning of Conservatism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377929_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377929_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-91244-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37792-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)